Influence of donor sex and age on graft outcome in kidney transplantation.

donor age individual patient data meta-analysis kidney graft survival sex differences

Journal

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
ISSN: 1460-2385
Titre abrégé: Nephrol Dial Transplant
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 19 8 2023
pubmed: 19 8 2023
entrez: 18 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is a known recipient sex-dependent association between donor sex and kidney transplant survival. We hypothesized that donor age also modifies the association between donor sex and graft survival. First deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (1988-2019, n = 461 364) recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, and the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. We used multivariable Cox regression models to estimate the association between donor sex and death censored graft loss, accounting for the modifying effects of recipient sex and donor age; donor age was categorized as 5-19, 20-34, 35-49, 50-59, and ≥ 60 years. Results from cohort-specific Cox models were combined using individual patient data meta-analysis. Among female recipients of donors aged < 60 years, graft loss hazards did not differ by donor sex; recipients of female donors ≥ 60 years showed significantly lower graft loss hazards than recipients of male donors of the same age (combined adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94). Among male recipients, female donors aged < 50 years were associated with significantly higher graft loss hazards than same-aged male donors (5-19 years: aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21; 20-34 years: aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15; 35-49 years: aHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10). There were no significant differences in graft loss by donor sex among male recipients of donors aged ≥ 50 years. Donor age modifies the association between donor sex and graft survival. Older female donors were associated with similar or lower hazards of graft failure than older male donors in both male and female recipients, suggesting a better functional reserve of older female donor kidneys.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS OBJECTIVE
There is a known recipient sex-dependent association between donor sex and kidney transplant survival. We hypothesized that donor age also modifies the association between donor sex and graft survival.
METHODS METHODS
First deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (1988-2019, n = 461 364) recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, and the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. We used multivariable Cox regression models to estimate the association between donor sex and death censored graft loss, accounting for the modifying effects of recipient sex and donor age; donor age was categorized as 5-19, 20-34, 35-49, 50-59, and ≥ 60 years. Results from cohort-specific Cox models were combined using individual patient data meta-analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among female recipients of donors aged < 60 years, graft loss hazards did not differ by donor sex; recipients of female donors ≥ 60 years showed significantly lower graft loss hazards than recipients of male donors of the same age (combined adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94). Among male recipients, female donors aged < 50 years were associated with significantly higher graft loss hazards than same-aged male donors (5-19 years: aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21; 20-34 years: aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15; 35-49 years: aHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10). There were no significant differences in graft loss by donor sex among male recipients of donors aged ≥ 50 years.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Donor age modifies the association between donor sex and graft survival. Older female donors were associated with similar or lower hazards of graft failure than older male donors in both male and female recipients, suggesting a better functional reserve of older female donor kidneys.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37596063
pii: 7246067
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad181
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.

Auteurs

Anette Melk (A)

Children's Hospital, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Rizky I Sugianto (RI)

Children's Hospital, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Xun Zhang (X)

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Mourad Dahhou (M)

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Bernd Döhler (B)

Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Caner Süsal (C)

Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze (R)

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Germaine Wong (G)

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Bethany J Foster (BJ)

Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Classifications MeSH