A syndemic of inequitable gender norms and intersecting stigmas on condom self-efficacy and practices among displaced youth living in urban slums in Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study.
Condom use efficacy and use
Displaced urban refugees
Inequitable gender norms
Intersectional stigma
Syndemics
Uganda
Journal
Conflict and health
ISSN: 1752-1505
Titre abrégé: Confl Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101286573
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2023
20 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
17
02
2022
accepted:
03
07
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
21
8
2023
entrez:
20
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adverse socio-cultural factors compromise the implementation of HIV prevention strategies among displaced youth. While condoms are an affordable and effective HIV prevention strategy for youth, stigma and inequitable gender norms may constrain condom self-efficacy (i.e., knowledge, intentions, and relationship dynamics that facilitate condom negotiation) and use. Further, knowledge of contextually appropriate HIV prevention approaches are constrained by limited understanding of the socio-cultural conditions that affect condom self-efficacy and use among displaced youth. Guided by syndemics theory, we examine independent and joint effects of adverse socio-cultural factors associated with condom self-efficacy and use among displaced youth living in urban slums in Kampala, Uganda. We conducted a community-based cross-sectional survey of displaced youth aged 16-24 years living in five slums in Kampala. We used multivariable logistic regression and multivariate linear regression to assess independent and two-way interactions among adverse socio-cultural factors (adolescent sexual and reproductive health-related stigma [A-SRH stigma], perceived HIV-related stigma, and beliefs in harmful inequitable gender norms) on condom self-efficacy and recent consistent condom use. We calculated the prevalence and co-occurrence of adverse socio-cultural factors; conducted regression analyses to create unique profiles of adverse socio-cultural factors; and then assessed joint effects of adverse socio-cultural factors on condom self-efficacy and practices. Among participants (mean age: 19.59 years; SD: 2.59; women: n = 333, men: n = 112), 62.5% were sexually active. Of these, only 53.3% reported recent consistent condom use. Overall, 42.73% of participants reported two co-occurring adverse socio-cultural factors, and 16.63% reported three co-occurring exposures. We found a joint effect of beliefs in harmful inequitable gender norms with high A-SRH stigma (β = - 0.20; p < 0.05) and high A-SRH stigma with high perceived HIV stigma (β = - 0.31; p < 0.001) on reduced condom self-efficacy. We found a multiplicative interaction between high A-SRH stigma with high perceived HIV stigma (aOR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.96) on recent consistent condom use. Additionally, we found that condom self-efficacy (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.05, 1.16) and safer sexual communication (aOR = 2.12; 95% CI 1.54, 2.91) acted as protective factors on inconsistent condom use. Displaced youth living in urban slums exhibited low consistent condom use. Intersecting stigmas were associated with lower condom self-efficacy-a protective factor linked with increased consistent condom use. Findings highlight the importance of gender transformative and intersectional stigma reduction approaches to increase sexual agency and safer sex practices among Kampala's slum-dwelling displaced youth.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Adverse socio-cultural factors compromise the implementation of HIV prevention strategies among displaced youth. While condoms are an affordable and effective HIV prevention strategy for youth, stigma and inequitable gender norms may constrain condom self-efficacy (i.e., knowledge, intentions, and relationship dynamics that facilitate condom negotiation) and use. Further, knowledge of contextually appropriate HIV prevention approaches are constrained by limited understanding of the socio-cultural conditions that affect condom self-efficacy and use among displaced youth. Guided by syndemics theory, we examine independent and joint effects of adverse socio-cultural factors associated with condom self-efficacy and use among displaced youth living in urban slums in Kampala, Uganda.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a community-based cross-sectional survey of displaced youth aged 16-24 years living in five slums in Kampala. We used multivariable logistic regression and multivariate linear regression to assess independent and two-way interactions among adverse socio-cultural factors (adolescent sexual and reproductive health-related stigma [A-SRH stigma], perceived HIV-related stigma, and beliefs in harmful inequitable gender norms) on condom self-efficacy and recent consistent condom use. We calculated the prevalence and co-occurrence of adverse socio-cultural factors; conducted regression analyses to create unique profiles of adverse socio-cultural factors; and then assessed joint effects of adverse socio-cultural factors on condom self-efficacy and practices.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among participants (mean age: 19.59 years; SD: 2.59; women: n = 333, men: n = 112), 62.5% were sexually active. Of these, only 53.3% reported recent consistent condom use. Overall, 42.73% of participants reported two co-occurring adverse socio-cultural factors, and 16.63% reported three co-occurring exposures. We found a joint effect of beliefs in harmful inequitable gender norms with high A-SRH stigma (β = - 0.20; p < 0.05) and high A-SRH stigma with high perceived HIV stigma (β = - 0.31; p < 0.001) on reduced condom self-efficacy. We found a multiplicative interaction between high A-SRH stigma with high perceived HIV stigma (aOR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.96) on recent consistent condom use. Additionally, we found that condom self-efficacy (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.05, 1.16) and safer sexual communication (aOR = 2.12; 95% CI 1.54, 2.91) acted as protective factors on inconsistent condom use.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Displaced youth living in urban slums exhibited low consistent condom use. Intersecting stigmas were associated with lower condom self-efficacy-a protective factor linked with increased consistent condom use. Findings highlight the importance of gender transformative and intersectional stigma reduction approaches to increase sexual agency and safer sex practices among Kampala's slum-dwelling displaced youth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37599369
doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00531-y
pii: 10.1186/s13031-023-00531-y
pmc: PMC10440931
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(3):86-106
pubmed: 31880507
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):6
pubmed: 30764820
Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):951-963
pubmed: 28271846
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jul;59(1):7-16
pubmed: 27338664
J Am Coll Health. 1991 Mar;39(5):219-25
pubmed: 1783705
Afr J Reprod Health. 2018 Mar;22(1):38-46
pubmed: 29777641
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;46(3):192-199
pubmed: 31871133
Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;31(1):63-9
pubmed: 21843001
Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(2):208-22
pubmed: 25335905
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(8):1225-35
pubmed: 18599171
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):479-485
pubmed: 29790075
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0173928
pubmed: 28358828
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;206:117-122
pubmed: 29628175
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 24;15(2):
pubmed: 29364192
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):41
pubmed: 30770756
J Int AIDS Soc. 2010 Feb 09;13:6
pubmed: 20181124
AIDS Behav. 2012 May;16(4):847-57
pubmed: 21604108
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e89786
pubmed: 24587034
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Aug 15;78(5):513-521
pubmed: 29697593
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Mar;24(3):e25674
pubmed: 33713571
Int J STD AIDS. 2022 Mar;33(4):374-384
pubmed: 35125037
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199300
pubmed: 29980147
Reprod Health. 2019 Mar 19;16(1):35
pubmed: 30890170
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Feb 2;10(2):e26192
pubmed: 33528378
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 May;26(5):572-581
pubmed: 33560587
Cult Health Sex. 2017 Oct;19(10):1092-1107
pubmed: 28276918
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S4):S356-S361
pubmed: 35763723
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):559-570
pubmed: 27760702
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 03;3(2):e000682
pubmed: 29736272
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013 Apr 23;13:22
pubmed: 23617404
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Jul;15(4):213-217
pubmed: 32412998
Confl Health. 2019 Nov 27;13:57
pubmed: 31788022
AIDS Res Treat. 2016;2016:5360180
pubmed: 27239340
Med Anthropol Q. 2003 Dec;17(4):423-41
pubmed: 14716917
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 27;17(7):
pubmed: 32230929
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 17;13:482
pubmed: 23679953
AIDS. 2005 May;19 Suppl 2:S67-72
pubmed: 15930843
Confl Health. 2019 Dec 17;13:60
pubmed: 31867053
Am J Mens Health. 2014 May;8(3):190-204
pubmed: 23832954
AIDS Behav. 2021 Oct;25(10):3106-3114
pubmed: 33988783
J Sex Res. 2018 Jan;55(1):60-72
pubmed: 28266874
Cult Health Sex. 2020 Jan;22(1):31-47
pubmed: 30762491
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 May 1;99(5):402-404
pubmed: 33958830
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):31
pubmed: 30764826
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jul;7(Suppl 5):
pubmed: 35798442
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 02;9(1):S1
pubmed: 25685183
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 May 11;24:49
pubmed: 27642390
J Sex Res. 2018 May -Jun;55(4-5):522-539
pubmed: 29466024
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 28;12:381
pubmed: 22639964
AIDS Care. 2021 Jul;33(7):897-903
pubmed: 33345581
AIDS Behav. 2016 Feb;20(2):423-30
pubmed: 26662266
AIDS Behav. 2022 Nov;26(11):3538-3550
pubmed: 35476165
Glob Public Health. 2020 Jul;15(7):943-955
pubmed: 32037962
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 18;5(12):e008226
pubmed: 26685020
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169721
pubmed: 28107371
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2535-2549
pubmed: 31155270
Reprod Health Matters. 2017 Nov;25(51):95-102
pubmed: 29231800
Med Anthropol. 2022 Jan;41(1):4-18
pubmed: 34958607
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Apr 6;8(4):e27792
pubmed: 35384852
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 08;10(4):e0122671
pubmed: 25853870