The nurses' perception of the factors influencing professional misconduct: A qualitative study.

Qualitative research nurses professional ethics professional misconduct

Journal

Nursing ethics
ISSN: 1477-0989
Titre abrégé: Nurs Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9433357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 21 8 2023
entrez: 21 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Professional misconduct undermines safe and quality care; however, little is known about its nature and influential factors. This study aimed to explain the factors influencing professional misconduct in nurses. This qualitative study was conducted using the conventional content analysis method. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 19 nurses working in the hospital selected through a purposeful method and analyzed by Graneheim and Lundman approach. The ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved this study with the ethics code IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.187. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants were assured of confidentiality. Factors influencing professional misconduct by nurses were categorized into three main categories: human factors (nurses' professional characteristics, personal characteristics of nurses and patient/companion, patient's clinical condition), procedural factors (procedural conditions, possibility of proving misconduct), and organizational factors (recruitment process, conditions of resources, managing misconduct, bureaucracy, and ward characteristics). This study assists in explaining the factors influencing professional misconduct by nurses. Therefore this study's results can help managers and planners develop interventions to prevent and correct factors that contribute to misconduct and strengthen factors that prevent misconduct in order to ensure quality and safe patient care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Professional misconduct undermines safe and quality care; however, little is known about its nature and influential factors.
AIM OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to explain the factors influencing professional misconduct in nurses.
RESEARCH DESIGN METHODS
This qualitative study was conducted using the conventional content analysis method.
PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT METHODS
Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 19 nurses working in the hospital selected through a purposeful method and analyzed by Graneheim and Lundman approach.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS METHODS
The ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved this study with the ethics code IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.187. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants were assured of confidentiality.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Factors influencing professional misconduct by nurses were categorized into three main categories: human factors (nurses' professional characteristics, personal characteristics of nurses and patient/companion, patient's clinical condition), procedural factors (procedural conditions, possibility of proving misconduct), and organizational factors (recruitment process, conditions of resources, managing misconduct, bureaucracy, and ward characteristics).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study assists in explaining the factors influencing professional misconduct by nurses. Therefore this study's results can help managers and planners develop interventions to prevent and correct factors that contribute to misconduct and strengthen factors that prevent misconduct in order to ensure quality and safe patient care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37599451
doi: 10.1177/09697330231184469
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

9697330231184469

Auteurs

Akram Ghobadi (A)

Department of Medical-Surgical, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Leila Sayadi (L)

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Nahid Dehghan Nayeri (ND)

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Alireza Namazi Shabestari (AN)

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Shokoh Varaei (S)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Classifications MeSH