Word usage as measured by parental checklists and language samples: trends, comparisons, and implications.
bilingual acquisition
language sampling
parental report
vocabulary acquisition
vocabulary checklist
word frequency
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
04
2023
accepted:
17
07
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
21
8
2023
entrez:
21
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although parental checklists are well-known for their potential in indexing young children's lexicon size, they can also be used to track children's acquisition of individual words. Word-level data can be used to identify the checklist words most and least commonly employed across groups of children. Like parent-completed vocabulary checklists, samples of spontaneous language use collected from multiple children can also generate measures of word commonality, concerned with the numbers of children producing individual words. To our knowledge, comparisons of word usage as determined by parental checklist and language sample data obtained in parallel from the same children have not been carried out. Also scarce in the empirical literature are item-level analyses of early bilingual lexicons that explore word usage across two emerging languages. The present study aimed to contribute toward bridging both gaps through the analysis of data generated by a bilingual Maltese-English adaptation of the vocabulary checklist of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences (CDI: WS) and spontaneous language samples for the same children. An additional objective was to derive implications for revising the current version of the vocabulary checklist, in preparation for its eventual standardization. For 44 Maltese children aged 12, 18, 24, and 30 months, the words reported by their main caregivers on the vocabulary checklist were identified, along with their respective semantic categories. For the same children, 20-min language samples obtained during free play with the caregiver were transcribed orthographically. Words identified through parental report and language sampling were analyzed for commonality, i.e., the number of children producing each word. Comparison of the word usage patterns obtained through both methods indicated differences in the words most commonly sampled and those most commonly reported, particularly in relation to grammatical categories. Notwithstanding these differences, positive and significant correlations emerged when considering all grammatical categories and languages across commonality levels. The commonality scores based on parental checklist data have implications for reconsidering the length and language balance of the Maltese-English adaptation of the CDI: WS vocabulary checklist. Sampled word usage patterns can contribute additional objectivity in updating the reporting instrument in preparation for its eventual standardization.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Although parental checklists are well-known for their potential in indexing young children's lexicon size, they can also be used to track children's acquisition of individual words. Word-level data can be used to identify the checklist words most and least commonly employed across groups of children. Like parent-completed vocabulary checklists, samples of spontaneous language use collected from multiple children can also generate measures of word commonality, concerned with the numbers of children producing individual words. To our knowledge, comparisons of word usage as determined by parental checklist and language sample data obtained in parallel from the same children have not been carried out. Also scarce in the empirical literature are item-level analyses of early bilingual lexicons that explore word usage across two emerging languages. The present study aimed to contribute toward bridging both gaps through the analysis of data generated by a bilingual Maltese-English adaptation of the vocabulary checklist of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Words and Sentences (CDI: WS) and spontaneous language samples for the same children. An additional objective was to derive implications for revising the current version of the vocabulary checklist, in preparation for its eventual standardization.
Materials and methods
UNASSIGNED
For 44 Maltese children aged 12, 18, 24, and 30 months, the words reported by their main caregivers on the vocabulary checklist were identified, along with their respective semantic categories. For the same children, 20-min language samples obtained during free play with the caregiver were transcribed orthographically. Words identified through parental report and language sampling were analyzed for commonality, i.e., the number of children producing each word.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Comparison of the word usage patterns obtained through both methods indicated differences in the words most commonly sampled and those most commonly reported, particularly in relation to grammatical categories. Notwithstanding these differences, positive and significant correlations emerged when considering all grammatical categories and languages across commonality levels.
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
The commonality scores based on parental checklist data have implications for reconsidering the length and language balance of the Maltese-English adaptation of the CDI: WS vocabulary checklist. Sampled word usage patterns can contribute additional objectivity in updating the reporting instrument in preparation for its eventual standardization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37599743
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214518
pmc: PMC10434779
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1214518Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Gatt, Camilleri and Grech.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Child Lang. 1994 Feb;21(1):85-123
pubmed: 8006096
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Aug 1;25(3):371-80
pubmed: 27387223
Augment Altern Commun. 2020 Mar;36(1):43-53
pubmed: 32172598
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):304-16
pubmed: 24382196
Pediatrics. 2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):e238-48
pubmed: 14993583
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007 Dec;32(4):291-301
pubmed: 18049973
J Child Lang. 1999 Feb;26(1):69-111
pubmed: 10217890
Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Sep;30(3):267-78
pubmed: 24921189
Child Dev. 1999 Jan-Feb;70(1):92-106
pubmed: 10191517
J Child Lang. 2018 Jul;45(4):939-958
pubmed: 29519264
J Child Lang. 2015 Jul;42(4):763-85
pubmed: 25158859
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Feb 9;65(2):672-691
pubmed: 34990558
J Child Lang. 1994 Oct;21(3):517-42
pubmed: 7852471
J Child Lang. 2002 Nov;29(4):735-57
pubmed: 12471971
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jan 17;:1-10
pubmed: 36650985
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(5):1-173; discussion 174-85
pubmed: 7845413
J Child Lang. 2008 Aug;35(3):619-50
pubmed: 18588717
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):565-71
pubmed: 2072681
J Child Lang. 2000 Oct;27(3):521-59
pubmed: 11089338
J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):677-694
pubmed: 27189114
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 May 8;29(2):625-637
pubmed: 32130865
Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):310-22
pubmed: 10834466
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2935-2948
pubmed: 28915512
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158753
pubmed: 27392128
J Child Lang. 1993 Oct;20(3):523-49
pubmed: 8300774