Microbial investigation of cleanability of different plastic and metal surfaces used by the food industry.

Cleanability Conveyor belts Food industry Hygienic design Nano materials Stainless steel finishes

Journal

Journal of food science and technology
ISSN: 0022-1155
Titre abrégé: J Food Sci Technol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0056471

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
revised: 18 05 2023
accepted: 28 05 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 21 8 2023
entrez: 21 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Different conveyor belt materials used by the meat and other food industries were compared, regarding their cleanability as bacterial reduction rates in relation to their surface topography. Eleven thermoplastic polymers, four stainless steels, and five aluminized nanostructured surfaces were investigated under laboratory conditions. Cleanings were conducted with water only, and with an alkaline foam detergent. Overall, scanning electron microscopy revealed remarkable differences in the surface topography of the tested surfaces. Water cleaning results showed that nanostructured aluminized surfaces achieved significantly higher cleanability rates compared to the eight thermoplastic surfaces, as well as the glass-bead blasted rough stainless steel. Thermoplastic surfaces showed overall low cleanability rates when cleaned with alkaline detergent, while stainless steel and nanoporous aluminum showed high variations. Overall, nanoporous aluminum showed promising results as it can be used to coat conveyor belts. However, compatibility with cleaning detergent and sensitivity to scratches must be further investigated. Overall, it can be concluded that cleanability is not only influenced by surface roughness, but also by the overall surface finish, scratches, and defects. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05778-0.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37599844
doi: 10.1007/s13197-023-05778-0
pii: 5778
pmc: PMC10439085
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2581-2590

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Références

J Food Prot. 2001 Aug;64(8):1178-82
pubmed: 11510656
Microb Pathog. 2018 Oct;123:505-526
pubmed: 30092260
Biofouling. 2014;30(10):1253-68
pubmed: 25427545
Food Microbiol. 2017 Apr;62:51-57
pubmed: 27889165
J Food Prot. 2001 Jan;64(1):87-93
pubmed: 11198446
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8399-404
pubmed: 23671097
J Packag Technol Res. 2020;4(1):23-32
pubmed: 32685915

Auteurs

Claudia Waldhans (C)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, 53115 Bonn, Germany.

Martin Hebel (M)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Dr. Berns Laboratorium GmbH & Co. KG, Bendschenweg 36, 47506 Neukirchen-Vluyn, Germany.

Ulrike Herbert (U)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Dr. Berns Laboratorium GmbH & Co. KG, Bendschenweg 36, 47506 Neukirchen-Vluyn, Germany.

Paul Spoelstra (P)

Marel Poultry B.V, Handelstraat 3, 5831 AV Boxmeer, The Netherlands.

Shai Barbut (S)

Food Science Department, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada.

Judith Kreyenschmidt (J)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Department of Fresh Produce Logistics, Hoschschule Geisenheim, Von-Lade-Strasse 1, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany.

Classifications MeSH