Cognitive control in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: a study with event-related potentials.
ERN
Pe
autism
cognitive control
conflict adaptation
flanker task
high-functioning
post-error slowing
Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
06
03
2023
accepted:
21
07
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
21
8
2023
entrez:
21
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Little is known about cognitive control in adults with high-functioning forms of autism spectrum disorder because previous research focused on children and adolescents. Cognitive control is crucial to monitor and readjust behavior after errors to select contextually appropriate reactions. The congruency effect and conflict adaptation are measures of cognitive control. Post-error slowing, error-related negativity and error positivity provide insight into behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of error processing. In children and adolescent with autism spectrum disorder deficits in cognitive control and error processing have been shown by changes in post-error slowing, error-related negativity and error positivity in the flanker task. We performed a modified Eriksen flanker task in 17 adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and 17 healthy controls. As behavioral measures of cognitive control and error processing, we included reaction times and error rates to calculate congruency effects, conflict adaptation, and post-error slowing. Event-related potentials namely error-related negativity and error positivity were measured to assess error-related brain activity. Both groups of participants showed the expected congruency effects demonstrated by faster and more accurate responses in congruent compared to incongruent trials. Healthy controls exhibited conflict adaptation as they obtained performance benefits after incongruent trials whereas patients with autism spectrum disorder did not. The expected slowing in reaction times after errors was observed in both groups of participants. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder demonstrated enhanced electrophysiological error-processing compared to healthy controls indicated by increased error-related negativity and error positivity difference amplitudes. Our findings show that adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder do not show the expected upregulation of cognitive control in response to conflicts. This finding implies that previous experiences may have a reduced influence on current behavior in these patients which possibly contributes to less flexible behavior. Nevertheless, we observed intact behavioral reactions after errors indicating that adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder can flexibly adjust behavior in response to changed environmental demands when necessary. The enhancement of electrophysiological error-processing indicates that adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder demonstrate an extraordinary reactivity toward errors reflecting increased performance monitoring in this subpopulation of autism spectrum disorder patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37599885
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1180827
pmc: PMC10436303
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1180827Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Möde, Borgolte, Ghaneirad, Roy, Sinke, Szycik, Bleich and Wiswede.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Sep;93(3):283-97
pubmed: 24950132
Psychophysiology. 2020 Feb;57(2):e13473
pubmed: 31536142
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;44(6):793-809
pubmed: 12959489
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Jul;28(2):399-406
pubmed: 18702711
Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):655-67
pubmed: 20512370
Semin Speech Lang. 2019 Aug;40(4):291-304
pubmed: 31311054
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 May;57(5):585-95
pubmed: 26709141
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 20;33(2):458-468
pubmed: 35238340
Acta Neurol Scand. 1995 May;91(5):335-45
pubmed: 7639062
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1343-54
pubmed: 18694617
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;23(9):769-783
pubmed: 31331794
Biol Psychol. 2010 Oct;85(2):242-51
pubmed: 20654684
J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Apr;34(2):163-75
pubmed: 15162935
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2476-93
pubmed: 18824404
Psychophysiology. 2011 Feb;48(2):241-51
pubmed: 20557481
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 May;47(5):1436-1452
pubmed: 28224345
Biol Psychol. 2000 Jan;51(2-3):87-107
pubmed: 10686361
Psychophysiology. 1996 May;33(3):282-94
pubmed: 8936397
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 15;80(2):94-99
pubmed: 27113503
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 14;8:213
pubmed: 24782741
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;82(12):1304-13
pubmed: 21693631
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Nov 16;7(4):
pubmed: 29144422
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Sep 30;16:998714
pubmed: 36248028
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Feb;13(2):74-82
pubmed: 19138551
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Jun;129(5-6):627-642
pubmed: 35624406
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Feb;96:1-8
pubmed: 28041946
Brain. 2008 Sep;131(Pt 9):2464-78
pubmed: 18550622
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
pubmed: 10945922
J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Nov;123(4):705-14
pubmed: 25286372
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1707-14
pubmed: 17320119
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
pubmed: 12239891
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Nov;8(11):494-500
pubmed: 15491903
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(9):1528-1548
pubmed: 28343453
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:964-987
pubmed: 34687698
Lancet. 2018 Aug 11;392(10146):508-520
pubmed: 30078460
Mem Cognit. 2006 Sep;34(6):1260-72
pubmed: 17225507
Autism Res. 2019 Feb;12(2):239-248
pubmed: 30485714
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Jan;36(1):5-25
pubmed: 16450045
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):223-44
pubmed: 26146755
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1991 Nov;32(7):1081-105
pubmed: 1787138
J Neurother. 2010 Apr 1;14(2):79-95
pubmed: 20523752
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959
pubmed: 15482068
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Feb 1;27(2):1545-1557
pubmed: 26796212
Biol Psychol. 2013 Jul;93(3):377-85
pubmed: 23607999
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Apr;102:33-46
pubmed: 26979761
Psychophysiology. 2004 Mar;41(2):313-25
pubmed: 15032997
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;53(4):440-8
pubmed: 22176206
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Feb;53(2):246-53
pubmed: 16485753
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Dec;121(4):480-506
pubmed: 1431740
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;6(7):590-600
pubmed: 31230684
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):3-19
pubmed: 30600616
Brain Cogn. 2006 Jun;61(1):96-109
pubmed: 16458401
Physiol Rev. 2014 Jan;94(1):35-79
pubmed: 24382883
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 09;5:1001
pubmed: 25250005
Mol Autism. 2016 Oct 5;7:41
pubmed: 27713815
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 May;23(5):1198-1204
pubmed: 28439105
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Aug;38:100665
pubmed: 31176282
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Mar;47(3):714-727
pubmed: 28070785
J Exp Psychol. 1966 Feb;71(2):264-72
pubmed: 5948188
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jan;135(1):29-41
pubmed: 27858958
Dev Sci. 2015 May;18(3):389-403
pubmed: 25066088
Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):450-2
pubmed: 12704394
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Mar;47(6):556-567
pubmed: 28394438
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
pubmed: 11488380
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Feb;45(2):548-59
pubmed: 24682651
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Feb;31(1):5-17
pubmed: 11439754
Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 11;6(10):e916
pubmed: 27727243
Nature. 2012 Apr 04;485(7397):237-41
pubmed: 22495306
Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1621-30
pubmed: 21806636
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Nov;121(4):885-96
pubmed: 22564180
Brain Cogn. 2006 Jun;61(1):25-39
pubmed: 16682102
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Jan 1;65(1):63-74
pubmed: 18996505
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 14;9(7):e102337
pubmed: 25019526