Glutamatergic neurometabolite levels in the caudate are associated with the ability of rhythm production.
caudate
glutamate
magnetic resonance spectroscopy
rhythm
rhythm production
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
30
03
2023
accepted:
12
07
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
21
8
2023
entrez:
21
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glutamatergic neurometabolites play important roles in the basal ganglia, a hub of the brain networks involved in musical rhythm processing. We aimed to investigate the relationship between rhythm processing abilities and glutamatergic neurometabolites in the caudate. We aquired Glutamatergic function in healthy individuals employing proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We targeted the right caudate and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) as a control region. Rhythm processing ability was assessed by the Harvard Beat Assessment Test (H-BAT). We found negative correlations between the production part of the Beat Saliency Test in the H-BAT and glutamate and glutamine levels in the caudate ( These results suggest that higher glutamatergic neurometabolite levels in the caudate may contribute to rhythm processing, especially the ability to produce meter in music precisely.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37600001
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1196805
pmc: PMC10436544
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1196805Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Honda, Noda, Matsushita, Tarumi, Nomiyama, Tsugawa, Tobari, Hondo, Saito, Mimura, Fujii and Nakajima.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Apr;23(4):913-21
pubmed: 22499797
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:35-45
pubmed: 19673753
Cortex. 2009 Jan;45(1):54-61
pubmed: 19027895
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 17;117(11):6196-6204
pubmed: 32132213
Front Psychol. 2010 Oct 25;1:171
pubmed: 21833234
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 26;7:771
pubmed: 24324421
J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 28;29(4):1175-90
pubmed: 19176826
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Mar;45(4):632-640
pubmed: 31842203
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):523-8
pubmed: 11756669
J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 10;29(23):7540-8
pubmed: 19515922
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Jan 03;5:90
pubmed: 22319477
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;27(7):2950-2967
pubmed: 35444257
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jun;115(1):1-5
pubmed: 9224828
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Apr;38(5):701-14
pubmed: 23232445
Cortex. 2009 Sep;45(8):982-90
pubmed: 19361785
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 3;196(1):49-54
pubmed: 18706452
Brain Cogn. 2008 Jul;67(2):150-61
pubmed: 18262701
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(1):3-25
pubmed: 20668434
Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 14;13:106
pubmed: 30837831
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:177-182
pubmed: 28916178
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Nov;29(11):2052-64
pubmed: 15199377
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 22;107(25):11597-601
pubmed: 20534501
Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 03;4:1008
pubmed: 24454299
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jun 13;420(2):179-83
pubmed: 17543993
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 9;31(10):3805-12
pubmed: 21389235
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 1;224:113024
pubmed: 32579893
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jan;77(1):23-33
pubmed: 26715192
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007 Sep;88(2):149-59
pubmed: 17513138