One-year clinical outcomes following Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve implantation in 487 young patients with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center experience.
INPIRIS RESILIA valve
aortic valve replacement
bioprosthetic valves
mortality
structural valve degeneration
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2023
accepted:
26
06
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
21
8
2023
entrez:
21
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of an aortic bioprosthesis is on the rise in younger patients with severe aortic stenosis despite the risk of accelerated structural valve degeneration (SVD). In the search for an optimal valve substitute that would not be prone to SVD, the INSPIRIS bioprosthesis represents a promising solution to lowering the risk of SVD. Here, we report the 1-year outcomes of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis in a population of young patients who underwent aortic valve replacement. In this prospective single-center study, we included all consecutive patients receiving INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthesis between June 2017 and July 2021. Patients with isolated severe aortic regurgitation were excluded. Clinical assessment and transthoracic echocardiography were performed preoperatively and at 1 year post-operatively. The primary outcome was overall mortality at one year. A total of 487 patients were included. The mean age was 58.2 ± 11.5 years, 75.2% were men. Most of the interventions were elective, with a mean EuroSCORE II of 4.8 ± 7.9. The valve annulus size in most cases was either 23 mm or 25 mm. Overall mortality at 1-year was 4.1%. At 1-year, 7 patients (1.4%) had a stroke, 4 patients (0.8%) had a myocardial infarction, and 20 patients (4.1%) were hospitalized for congestive heart failure. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates and survival without major adverse cardiac events at 1-year were 96.4% and 96.7%, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, 10 patients (2.1%) had endocarditis and 1 patient (0.2%) had partial prosthetic thrombosis. Pacemaker implantation at 1-year post-operative was necessary in 27 patients (5.5%). Severe patient prosthesis mismatch and severe intra valvular regurgitation were 1.2% and 0.6%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates at 1-year of no infective endocarditis preoperative and infective endocarditis preoperative were 97.9 ± 0.7% and 89.5 ± 3.3%, respectively ( This is the largest single-center descriptive study of the 1-year outcomes after INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthesis implantation. The EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthesis provides encouraging clinical outcomes with an excellent 1- year survival rates and good hemodynamic performance. Long-term studies are mandatory to assess valve durability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37600038
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1196447
pmc: PMC10435896
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1196447Informations de copyright
© 2023 Porto, Stolpe, Badaoui, Boudouresques, Deutsch, Amanatiou, Riberi, Gariboldi, Collart and Theron.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CD is employed by Edwards Lifesciences to perform the statistical analysis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Ultrastruct Pathol. 2014 Aug;38(4):281-4
pubmed: 24833324
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 01;52(3):432-439
pubmed: 28605428
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;42(5):S45-60
pubmed: 23026738
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May 02;37(2):239-250
pubmed: 34673516
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227
pubmed: 33332150
Circ J. 2014;78(4):882-9
pubmed: 24621565
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul;100(1):122-130
pubmed: 35485723
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Mar;79(3):1072-80
pubmed: 15734452
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Sep;30(3):485-91
pubmed: 16857373
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632
pubmed: 34453165
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):1002-12
pubmed: 23727214
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jul;11(7):3039-3046
pubmed: 31463133
J Artif Organs. 2022 Dec;25(4):323-328
pubmed: 35129732
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):539-547.e9
pubmed: 29110948
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(3):618-624
pubmed: 29297188
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;53(3):495-504
pubmed: 29029105
J Card Surg. 2022 Dec;37(12):4833-4840
pubmed: 36403275
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;162(5):1478-1485
pubmed: 32340804
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jun;115(6):1429-1436
pubmed: 35065065
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jan 29;59(2):434-441
pubmed: 33141188
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 21;36(44):3075-3128
pubmed: 26320109
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar 13;16(5):530-539
pubmed: 36922038
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671
pubmed: 29781182
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):315-27
pubmed: 26794881