Turkish validity and reliability study of the "respectful maternity care" knowledge and practice scale of midwives.

Midwife Reliability Respectful maternity care Scale Validity

Journal

European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X
ISSN: 2590-1613
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101750520

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 01 06 2023
revised: 20 07 2023
accepted: 29 07 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 21 8 2023
entrez: 21 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Increasing cesarean rates in Turkey show that respectful maternity care services should be given priority and importance. It is difficult to achieve sustainable development goals without adopting a respectful maternity care approach, and there is no Turkish measurement tool to evaluate the knowledge and practices of midwives on "respectful maternity care". The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the "respectful maternity care knowledge and practice scale of midwives" is an appropriate measurement tool for Turkish women by conducting a Turkish validity and reliability study. The methodological study was carried out by midwives working in three Public Hospitals. Data were collected face-to-face using the "introductory information form" and "the respectful maternity care knowledge and practice scale of midwives". The scale consists of two sections knowledge and practice. Both sections have three sub-dimensions: "providing emotional support", "providing safe care", and "preventing abuse". The cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient value ranged between 0.76 and 0.95 for both sections.This study has determined that this scale, which was adapted, consists of three sub-dimensions and 46 items (23 items each) in both knowledge and application sections, is a highly valid and reliable scale compatible with Turkish culture, as a result of the validity and reliability findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37600070
doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100222
pii: S2590-1613(23)00047-9
pmc: PMC10432589
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100222

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Références

J Psychosom Res. 2010 Apr;68(4):319-23
pubmed: 20307697
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 9;15(3):e0229941
pubmed: 32150593
Midwifery. 2021 Mar;94:102904
pubmed: 33341537
Birth. 2020 Dec;47(4):346-356
pubmed: 32052494
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241219
pubmed: 33141835
Midwifery. 2022 Jul;110:103320
pubmed: 35421788
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 9;20(1):26
pubmed: 31918682
Reprod Health. 2022 Apr 22;19(1):98
pubmed: 35459182

Auteurs

Elif Dağlı (E)

Çukurova University, Abdi Sütcü Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Health Care Services, Adana, Turkey.

Feyza Aktaş Reyhan (F)

Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Midwifery Department, Kütahya, Turkey.

Fatma Nilüfer Topkara (FN)

Provincial Health Directorate, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Maryam Moridi (M)

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Reproductive Health, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Classifications MeSH