Expectation adaptation for rare cadences in music: Item order matters in repetition priming.
Bayesian inference
Expectation
Music cognition
Repetition priming
Statistical learning
Journal
Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
24
02
2023
revised:
08
08
2023
accepted:
14
08
2023
pmc-release:
01
11
2024
medline:
13
9
2023
pubmed:
22
8
2023
entrez:
21
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Humans make predictions about future events in many domains, including when they listen to music. Previous accounts of harmonic expectation in music have emphasised the role of implicit musical knowledge acquired in the long term through the mechanism of statistical learning. However, it is not known whether listeners can adapt their expectations for unusual harmonies in the short term through repetition priming, and whether the extent of any short-term adaptation depends on the unfolding statistical structure of the music. To explore these possibilities, we presented 150 participants with phrases from Bach chorales that ended with a cadence that was either a priori likely or unlikely based on the long-term statistical structure of the corpus of chorales. While holding the 50-50 incidence of likely vs. unlikely cadences constant, we manipulated the order in which these phrases were presented such that the local probability of hearing an unlikely cadence changed throughout the experiment. For each phrase, participants provided two judgements: (a) a prospective rating of how confident they were in their expectations for the cadence, and (b) a retrospective rating of how well the presented cadence matched their expectations. While confidence ratings increased over the course of the experiment, the rate of change decreased as the local probability of an unexpected cadence increased. Participants' expectations favoured likely cadences over unlikely cadences on average, but their expectation ratings for unlikely cadences increased at a faster rate over the course of the experiment than for likely cadences, particularly when the local probability of hearing an unlikely cadence was high. Thus, despite entrenched long-term statistics about cadences, listeners can indeed adapt to unusual musical harmonies and are sensitive to the local statistical structure of the musical environment. We suggest that this adaptation is an instance of Bayesian belief updating, a domain-general process that accounts for expectation adaptation in multiple domains.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37604028
pii: S0010-0277(23)00235-4
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105601
pmc: PMC10501749
mid: NIHMS1926098
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105601Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD037082
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest None.
Références
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:304-12
pubmed: 14681154
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):470-82
pubmed: 12760629
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 May;12(3):520-41
pubmed: 10931776
Curr Biol. 2017 Dec 18;27(24):R1321-R1324
pubmed: 29257968
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
pubmed: 20809790
Music Percept. 2010 Jun 1;27(5):377-388
pubmed: 20740059
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1380-93
pubmed: 16859422
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
pubmed: 17600525
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:23-34
pubmed: 30913527
Mem Cognit. 1996 May;24(3):342-55
pubmed: 8718768
Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):491-505
pubmed: 17521377
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Nov 4;16(11):e1008304
pubmed: 33147209
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5933
pubmed: 32246059
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 11;:
pubmed: 29749625
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;1(6):811-823
pubmed: 26271779
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105123
pubmed: 35461113
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1545-54
pubmed: 16989554
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;8(1-2):
pubmed: 27906526
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89642
pubmed: 24586929
Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jan;24(1):56-98
pubmed: 1537232
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Jun 06;8:94
pubmed: 24936174
Psychol Rev. 1982 Jul;89(4):334-68
pubmed: 7134332
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;42(1):43-76
pubmed: 28121017
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Mar 22;4:25
pubmed: 20631856
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jun;72(6):1422-1438
pubmed: 30404574
Child Dev. 1988 Apr;59(2):467-79
pubmed: 3359865
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):1119-30
pubmed: 15355140
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Oct;69(7):1084-92
pubmed: 18038947
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1565-77
pubmed: 16269097
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jul;49(7):999-1015
pubmed: 37227858
Cognition. 1999 Feb 1;70(1):27-52
pubmed: 10193055
Cognition. 1999 Dec 17;73(3):247-64
pubmed: 10585516
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Feb;29(1):159-71
pubmed: 12669755
Cognition. 2016 Feb;147:29-56
pubmed: 26605963
Psychophysiology. 2002 Sep;39(5):657-63
pubmed: 12236333
Curr Biol. 2021 Aug 9;31(15):3358-3364.e4
pubmed: 34022155
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Oct;59(7):1098-107
pubmed: 9360482
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):443-67
pubmed: 15910130
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77661
pubmed: 24204909
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407
pubmed: 31016684
Cogn Psychol. 2004 Mar;48(2):127-62
pubmed: 14732409
J Neurosci. 2019 Nov 20;39(47):9397-9409
pubmed: 31636112
Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):244-7
pubmed: 14724638
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):458-67
pubmed: 12018498
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):403-9
pubmed: 19716752
Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):495-501
pubmed: 16102533
Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;33(5):951-68
pubmed: 21585492
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):374-81
pubmed: 19293110
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Spring;7(2):153-64
pubmed: 23961821
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 23;5:1052
pubmed: 25295018
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Apr;8(2):227-33
pubmed: 9635206
Neuron. 2012 Jul 26;75(2):265-70
pubmed: 22841311
Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):254-60
pubmed: 17444923
Cognition. 2021 Feb;207:104522
pubmed: 33256974
Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8
pubmed: 8943209
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Nov;12(4):403-10
pubmed: 2946797
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Nov;58(8):1347-75
pubmed: 16365943
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):33-65
pubmed: 24490788