Investigating Socioeconomic Barriers to Cochlear Implantation.


Journal

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2023
Historique:
medline: 15 9 2023
pubmed: 22 8 2023
entrez: 21 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore socioeconomic disparities in cochlear implant evaluation (CIE) referrals and cochlear implantation. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary referral academic center. Adult patients (n = 271) with an audiogram performed between 2015 and 2019 with a pure-tone average of at least 60 dB and word recognition score of 60% or less in the better-hearing ear or no word recognition score performed were included to determine if socioeconomic factors influenced the rate of referral to CIE and cochlear implantation. There were 122 insured patients referred to CIE where 84 were considered cochlear implant (CI) candidates and 73 were implanted. In multivariate regression analysis, non-English-speaking patients were referred to CIE at lower rates ( p < 0.01) than English-speaking patients. Patients who met the CI candidacy criteria with private insurance ( p = 0.03) or Medicare with private insurance supplement ( p = 0.03) had higher rates of cochlear implantation than those with Medicare or Medicaid. Of the uninsured patients (n = 22), 3 were referred to CIE and 2 were considered CI candidates. No uninsured patients received a CI. Primary language spoken was associated with a disparity in rates of CIE referral. Insurance type did influence rate of cochlear implantation once patients completed CIE and were considered CI candidates. Additional research is needed to implement strategies for more inclusive treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37604510
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003985
pii: 00129492-990000000-00385
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e660-e666

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

Références

Reed NS, Altan A, Deal JA, et al. Trends in health care costs and utilization associated with untreated hearing loss over 10 years. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;145:27–34.
World Health Organization: Global Costs of Unaddressed Hearing Loss and Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions. Available at: https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/worldhearingday/GlobalCostsOfUnaddressedHearingLossExeSum.pdf?ua=1 . Accessed February 2, 2021.
Helvik AS, Krokstad S, Tambs K. Hearing loss and risk of early retirement: The HUNT study. Eur J Pub Health 2013;23:617–22.
Huddle MG, Goman AM, Kernizan FC, et al. The economic impact of adult hearing loss: A systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;143:1040–8.
Gaylor JM, Raman G, Chung M, et al. Cochlear implantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:265–72.
Sorkin DL. Cochlear implantation in the world's largest medical device market: Utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14(suppl 1):S4–S12.
Chien W, Lin FR. Prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:292–3.
Sorkin DL, Buchman CA. Cochlear implant access in six developed countries. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:e161–4.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision memo for cochlear implantation. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=134 . Accessed August 1, 2021.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Health Insurance Coverage. Available at; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/health-insurance.htm . Accessed June 1, 2021.
Diamond L, Grbic D, Genoff M, et al. Non–English-language proficiency of applicants to US residency programs. JAMA 2014;312:2405–7.
Proctor A, Ramkissoon I. Speech materials for testing hearing of deaf and hard of hearing children from non–English-speaking backgrounds. Perspect Commun Disord Sci Cultural Linguist Diverse Popul 2014;7:8–10.
Laura Gaeta BHS, John AB. Considerations in speech recognition testing of bilingual and Spanish-speaking patients. Part I: Older children and adults. J Pediatr Educ (Re)habilitat Audiol 2015;39.
Ramkissoon I, Khan F. Serving multilingual clients with hearing loss: How linguistic diversity affects audiologic management. ASHA Leader 2003;8:1–27.
Mahon M, Rajput K, Vickers D. Expert opinion: Assessing cochlear implant candidacy and progress for people with English as an additional language. Cochlear Implants Int 2016;17(sup1):59–61.
Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Shallop JK, Sydlowski SA. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear 2010;31:186–94.
Holder JT, Reynolds SM, Sunderhaus LW, Gifford RH. Current profile of adults presenting for preoperative cochlear implant evaluation. Trends in hearing 2018;22:2331216518755288.
Zwolan TA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Pleasant T. Development of a 60/60 guideline for referring adults for a traditional cochlear implant candidacy evaluation. Otol Neurotol 2020;41:895–900.
Roland JT Jr., Gantz BJ, Waltzman SB, Parkinson AJ. Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with high-frequency hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2018;128:1939–45.
Rumbaut RG, Massey DS. Immigration language diversity in the United States. Daedalus 2013;142:141–54.
Pitkin Derose K, Bahney BW, Lurie N, Escarce JJ. Immigrants and health care access, quality, and cost. Med Care Res Rev 2009;66:355–408.
Shi LF. Validating models of clinical word recognition tests for Spanish/English bilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014;57:1896–907.
Demographic Profile of ASHA Members Providing Bilingual Services Year-End . American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2020: Available at: www.asha.org/siteassets/surveys/demographic-profile-bilingual-spanish-service-members.pdf . Accessed August 10, 2021.
Tolisano AM, Schauwecker N, Baumgart B, et al. Identifying disadvantaged groups for cochlear implantation: Demographics from a large cochlear implant program. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020;129:347–57.
Mahendran GN, Rosenbluth T, Featherstone M, et al. Racial disparities in adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;166:1099–105.
Zwolan TA, Kallogjeri D, Firszt JB, Buchman CA. Assessment of cochlear implants for adult Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who meet expanded indications of open-set sentence recognition: A multicenter nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;146:933–41.
Baker B. Estimates of the unauthorized immigrant population residing in the United States. Population Estimates 2021;58:2315–36.
Social Security Office of Retirement and Disability Policy: Who Never Receives Social. Available at: https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v71n2/v71n2p17.html . Accessed October 1, 2021.

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH