Psychological characteristics of young adults with temporomandibular disorders, somatization and combined conditions: A multidimensional evaluation.
coping
personality
psychological distress
somatic symptoms
temporomandibular disorders
Journal
Journal of oral rehabilitation
ISSN: 1365-2842
Titre abrégé: J Oral Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0433604
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
revised:
01
07
2023
received:
09
05
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
medline:
3
11
2023
pubmed:
22
8
2023
entrez:
22
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Temporomandibular disorders and somatization have shown interrelation in many studies. The physical and psychological factors which contributed to the occurrence and relation of both conditions are yet to be determined. The personality traits, coping styles and psychological distress of young adults with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and somatic symptoms were characterized together with the determination of psychological risk factors for TMDs, somatization and combined conditions. Participants were recruited from university-attending young adults. TMD and somatic symptoms were appraised with the short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index and Patient Health Questionnaire-15. Psychological variables were assessed with the Big Five Personality Inventory-10, Brief-COPE Inventory and Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21. Data were evaluated using chi-squared/non-parametric tests and logistic regression analyses (α = .05). Among the 507 participants (mean age 22.2 ± 1.5 years), 46.4% reported no TMD/somatic symptoms (NS) while 7.5%, 34.5% and 11.6% had TMDs only (TS), somatization only (SS) and combined TMDs-somatization (CS), respectively. Significant differences in conscientiousness (NS > SS), agreeableness (NS, TS > CS; NS > SS), dysfunctional coping, general distress, depression, anxiety and stress (CS ≥ SS > NS) were discerned. Multivariate analyses indicated that the odds of TS were increased by anxiety (OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.01-1.21), while the odds of SS/CS were affected by anxiety (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.06-1.25/OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.19-1.52) and problem-focused coping (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.56-0.89/OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.39-0.78). Though individuals with TMDs and somatization have dissimilar psychological profiles, anxiety constantly increased their likelihood. Problem-focused coping strategies may help alleviate psychosocial and physical stressors associated with TMDs and somatization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Temporomandibular disorders and somatization have shown interrelation in many studies. The physical and psychological factors which contributed to the occurrence and relation of both conditions are yet to be determined.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The personality traits, coping styles and psychological distress of young adults with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and somatic symptoms were characterized together with the determination of psychological risk factors for TMDs, somatization and combined conditions.
METHODS
METHODS
Participants were recruited from university-attending young adults. TMD and somatic symptoms were appraised with the short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index and Patient Health Questionnaire-15. Psychological variables were assessed with the Big Five Personality Inventory-10, Brief-COPE Inventory and Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21. Data were evaluated using chi-squared/non-parametric tests and logistic regression analyses (α = .05).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 507 participants (mean age 22.2 ± 1.5 years), 46.4% reported no TMD/somatic symptoms (NS) while 7.5%, 34.5% and 11.6% had TMDs only (TS), somatization only (SS) and combined TMDs-somatization (CS), respectively. Significant differences in conscientiousness (NS > SS), agreeableness (NS, TS > CS; NS > SS), dysfunctional coping, general distress, depression, anxiety and stress (CS ≥ SS > NS) were discerned. Multivariate analyses indicated that the odds of TS were increased by anxiety (OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.01-1.21), while the odds of SS/CS were affected by anxiety (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.06-1.25/OR = 1.34; 95% CI = 0.19-1.52) and problem-focused coping (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.56-0.89/OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.39-0.78).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Though individuals with TMDs and somatization have dissimilar psychological profiles, anxiety constantly increased their likelihood. Problem-focused coping strategies may help alleviate psychosocial and physical stressors associated with TMDs and somatization.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1382-1392Subventions
Organisme : Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
ID : 0142/PUF/FKG/2021-202
Informations de copyright
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, et al., eds. Temporomandibular Disorders: Priorities for Research and Care. National Academies Press (US); 2020.
List T, Jensen RH. Temporomandibular disorders: old ideas and new concepts. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(7):692-704. doi:10.1177/0333102416686302
Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(4):453-462. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.021
Ryan J, Akhter R, Hassan N, Hilton G, Wickham J, Ibaragi S. Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorder in the general population: a systematic review. Adv Dent Oral Health. 2019;10:555787. doi:10.19080/ADOH.2019.10.555787
Bueno CH, Pereira DD, Pattussi MP, Grossi PK, Grossi ML. Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(9):720-729. doi:10.1111/joor.12661
Pigozzi LB, Pereira DD, Pattussi MP, et al. Quality of life in young and middle age adult temporomandibular disorders patients and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):83. doi:10.1186/s12955-021-01727-7
Bitiniene D, Zamaliauskiene R, Kubilius R, Leketas M, Gailius T, Smirnovaite K. Quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A systematic review. Stomatologija. 2018;20(1):3-9.
Slade GD, Fillingim RB, Sanders AE, et al. Summary of findings from the OPPERA prospective cohort study of incidence of first-onset temporomandibular disorder: implications and future directions. J Pain. 2013;14(12 Suppl):T116-T124. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.010
Felin GC, Tagliari CVDC, Agostini BA, Collares K. Prevalence of psychological disorders in patients with temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;S0022-3913(22)00482-6.[published online ahead of print]. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.002
De La Torre Canales G, Câmara-Souza MB, Muñoz Lora VRM, et al. Prevalence of psychosocial impairment in temporomandibular disorder patients: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(11):881-889. doi:10.1111/joor.12685
Yap AU, Sultana R, Natu VP. Somatic and temporomandibular disorder symptoms - idioms of psychological distress in Southeast Asian youths. Cranio. 2021;1-8. [published online ahead of print]. doi:10.1080/08869634.2021.1982496
Kleykamp BA, Ferguson MC, McNicol E, et al. The prevalence of comorbid chronic pain conditions among patients with temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2022;153(3):241-250.e10. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.008
Fantoni F, Salvetti G, Manfredini D, Bosco M. Current concepts on the functional somatic syndromes and temporomandibular disorders. Stomatologija. 2007;9(1):3-9.
Costa YM, Conti PC, de Faria FA, Bonjardim LR. Temporomandibular disorders and painful comorbidities: clinical association and underlying mechanisms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(3):288-297. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2016.12.005
Dreher A, Hahn E, Diefenbacher A, et al. Cultural differences in symptom representation for depression and somatization measured by the PHQ between Vietnamese and German psychiatric outpatients. J Psychosom Res. 2017;102:71-77. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.09.010
Choi E, Chentsova-Dutton Y, Parrott WG. The effectiveness of somatization in communicating distress in Korean and American cultural contexts. Front Psychol. 2016;7:383. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00383
Sun Y, Chen G, Wang L, et al. Perception of stigma and its associated factors among patients with major depressive disorder: a multicenter survey from an Asian population. Front Psych. 2019;10:321. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00321
Panayiotou G, Kokkinos CM, Kapsou M. Indirect and direct associations between personality and psychological distress mediated by dispositional coping. J Psychol. 2014;148(5):549-567. doi:10.1080/00223980.2013.817375
Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10 item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J Res Pers. 2007;41(1):203-212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Cooper C, Katona C, Livingston G. Validity and reliability of the Brief COPE in carers of people with dementia: the LASER-AD study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(11):838-843. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31818b504c
Ferrando M, Andreu Y, Galdón MJ, Durá E, Poveda R, Bagán JV. Psychological variables and temporomandibular disorders: distress, coping, and personality. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;98(2):153-160. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.12.030
Gębska M, Dalewski B, Pałka Ł, Kołodziej Ł, Sobolewska E. The importance of type D personality in the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and depression in students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Sci. 2021;12(1):28. doi:10.3390/brainsci12010028
Michelotti A, Martina R, Russo M, Romeo R. Personality characteristics of temporomandibular disorder patients using M.M.P.I. Cranio. 1998;16(2):119-125. doi:10.1080/08869634.1998.11746048
Reissmann DR, John MT, Schierz O, Seedorf H, Doering S. Stress-related adaptive versus maladaptive coping and temporomandibular disorder pain. J Orofac Pain. 2012;26(3):181-190.
GaldOn MJ, Durá E, Andreu Y, Ferrando M, Poveda R, Bagán JV. Multidimensional approach to the differences between muscular and articular temporomandibular patients: coping, distress, and pain characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102(1):40-46. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.067
Yap AU, Tan SHX, Marpaung C. Temporomandibular disorder symptoms in young adults: three-dimensional impact on oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49(8):769-777. doi:10.1111/joor.13340
Yap AU, Cao Y, Zhang MJ, Lei J, Fu KY. Age-related differences in diagnostic categories, psychological states and oral health-related quality of life of adult temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48(4):361-368. doi:10.1111/joor.13121
Twenge JM, Cooper AB, Joiner TE, Duffy ME, Binau SG. Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005-2017. J Abnorm Psychol. 2019;128(3):185-199. doi:10.1037/abn0000410
Serbic D, Friedrich C, Murray R. Psychological, social and academic functioning in university students with chronic pain: a systematic review. J Am Coll Health. 2021;1-15. [published online ahead of print]. doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.2006199
Hilderink PH, Collard R, Rosmalen JG, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms in old age populations in comparison with younger age groups: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(1):151-156. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2012.04.004
Yap AU, Zhang MJ, Lei J, Fu KY. Diagnostic accuracy of the short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in relation to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(5):977-983. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.016
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(2):258-266. doi:10.1097/00006842-200203000-00008
Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Psychology Foundation; 1995.
Zagalaz-Anula N, Sánchez-Torrelo CM, Acebal-Blanco F, et al. The short form of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for the screening of temporomandibular disorders: validity and reliability in a Spanish-speaking population. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5858. doi:10.3390/jcm10245858
Pires PF, de Castro EM, Pelai EB, de Arruda ABC, Rodrigues-Bigaton D. Analysis of the accuracy and reliability of the short-form Fonseca Anamnestic Index in the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder in women. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018;22(4):276-282. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.02.003
Zijlema WL, Stolk RP, Löwe B, et al. How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74(6):459-468. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Löwe B. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(4):345-359. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006
Kurlansik SL, Maffei MS. Somatic symptom disorder. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(1):49-54.
Liao SC, Huang WL, Ma HM, et al. The relation between the patient health questionnaire-15 and DSM somatic diagnoses. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):351. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1068-2
Ringwald WR, Manuck SB, Marsland AL, Wright AGC. Psychometric evaluation of a Big Five Personality State Scale for intensive longitudinal studies. Assessment. 2022;29(6):1301-1319. doi:10.1177/10731911211008254
García FE, Barraza-Peña CG, Wlodarczyk A, Alvear-Carrasco M, Reyes-Reyes A. Psychometric properties of the Brief-COPE for the evaluation of coping strategies in the Chilean population. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018;31(1):22. doi:10.1186/s41155-018-0102-3
Henry N, Kayser D, Egermann H. Music in mood regulation and coping orientations in response to COVID-19 lockdown measures within the United Kingdom. Front Psychol. 2021;12:647879. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647879
Lee J, Lee EH, Moon SH. Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(9):2325-2339. doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02177-
Dancey CP, Reidy J. Statistics without Maths for Psychology. 7th ed. Pearson; 2017.
Osborn TG, Li S, Saunders R, Fonagy P. University students' use of mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022;16(1):57. doi:10.1186/s13033-022-00569-0
Hiller W, Rief W, Brähler E. Somatization in the population: from mild bodily misperceptions to disabling symptoms. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(9):704-712. doi:10.1007/s00127-006-0082-y
Ran L, Wang W, Ai M, Kong Y, Chen J, Kuang L. Psychological resilience, depression, anxiety, and somatization symptoms in response to COVID-19: a study of the general population in China at the peak of its epidemic. Soc Sci Med. 2020;262:113261. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113261
Nimmo SB. Medically unexplained symptoms. Occup Med. 2015;65(2):92-94. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqv004
Mirnics Z, Heincz O, Bagdy G, et al. The relationship between the big five personality dimensions and acute psychopathology: mediating and moderating effects of coping strategies. Psychiatr Danub. 2013;25(4):379-388.
Mostafaei S, Kabir K, Kazemnejad A, et al. Explanation of somatic symptoms by mental health and personality traits: application of Bayesian regularized quantile regression in a large population study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):207. doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2189-1
Hyphantis T, Goulia P, Carvalho AF. Personality traits, defense mechanisms and hostility features associated with somatic symptom severity in both health and disease. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75(4):362-369. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.08.014
Perez DL, Barsky AJ, Vago DR, Baslet G, Silbersweig DA. A neural circuit framework for somatosensory amplification in somatoform disorders. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015;27(1):e40-e50. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13070170
Yap AU, Lee DZR, Marpaung C. Negative affectivity and emotions in youths with temporomandibular disorders across cultures. Cranio. 2022;1-9. [published online ahead of print]. doi:10.1080/08869634.2022.2107146
Bonjardim LR, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Anxiety and depression in adolescents and their relationship with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(4):347-352.
Hanel G, Henningsen P, Herzog W, et al. Depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(3):189-197. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.013
Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56(2):267-283. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267
Hall NM, Kuzminskyte R, Pedersen AD, Ørnbøl E, Fink P. The relationship between cognitive functions, somatization and behavioural coping in patients with multiple functional somatic symptoms. Nord J Psychiatry. 2011;65(3):216-224. doi:10.3109/08039488.2010.528024
Kirmayer LJ, Robbins JM, Paris J. Somatoform disorders: personality and the social matrix of somatic distress. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(1):125-136. doi:10.1037//0021-843x.103.1.125
Ode S, Robinson MD. Agreeableness and the self-regulation of negative affect: findings involving the neuroticism/somatic distress relationship. Pers Individ Differ. 2007;43(8):2137-2148. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.035
Smith WG. Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of University Faculty online survey response behavior. Institute of Educational Sciences. Accessed January 15, 2023. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED501717
Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:211-217. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S104807