Tibiotarsal Arthrodesis with Retrograde Intramedullary Nail and RIA Graft: A Salvage Technique.
ankle arthrodesis
fractures
infections
retrograde nail
Journal
Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
ISSN: 2411-5142
Titre abrégé: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101712257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Aug 2023
21 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2023
revised:
09
08
2023
accepted:
15
08
2023
medline:
22
8
2023
pubmed:
22
8
2023
entrez:
22
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ankle arthrodesis is a commonly used salvage procedure in the management of post-traumatic ankle fractures, which often result in severe disability and may require the amputation of the distal third of the leg. Successful ankle arthrodesis relies on a thorough assessment of local and systemic risk factors to ensure optimal results. Failure to accurately assess these factors may lead to unsatisfactory results. High-energy trauma causing bone defects and soft tissue necrosis often results in osteomyelitis, a condition that poses a significant threat to the success of the arthrodesis procedure. It is important to apply a standardised surgical protocol to minimise the possibility of superficial and deep infection and limit damage to the neighbouring soft tissues. Therefore, it is critical to undertake surgical lavage and debridement and administer systemic and local antibiotic therapy, along with the use of a spacer, to eradicate infection prior to performing arthrodesis. In this study, we present our experience in the recovery of limbs with post-traumatic complications via tibio-astragalic or tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail technique. The approach involves a multi-step procedure using a previous antibiotic spacer implant and an autologous bone graft (RIA). This study spanned a period from January 2014 to December 2021 and included 35 patients (12 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 47.8 ± 20.08 years (range: 22-85 years). Among the patients, 18 had osteomyelitis following AO 43 C3 fractures, and 9 of them had previous exposure and bone loss at the time of injury. The remaining cases included 10 patients with AO 44 C fracture outcomes and 7 patients with AO 44 B fracture outcomes. Our results emphasise the importance of the meticulous management of local and systemic risk factors in ankle arthrodesis procedures. The successful eradication of infection and subsequent arthrodesis can be achieved via the implementation of surgical lavage, debridement, and systemic and local antibiotic therapy using spacers. This surgical protocol implemented by us has yielded excellent results, saving affected limbs from post-traumatic complications and avoiding the need for amputation. Our study contributes to the existing knowledge supporting the use of retrograde arthrodesis with intramedullary nails in severe cases where limb salvage is the primary goal. However, further research and long-term follow-up studies are needed to validate these results and evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in a larger patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37606418
pii: jfmk8030122
doi: 10.3390/jfmk8030122
pmc: PMC10443274
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Oct;470(10):2864-73
pubmed: 22777590
Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Apr;149(2):212-8
pubmed: 20941692
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):1050-5
pubmed: 1522091
J Trauma. 1999 Dec;47(6):1072-8
pubmed: 10608535
Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Nov;15(11):581-4
pubmed: 7849972
World J Orthop. 2016 Nov 18;7(11):700-708
pubmed: 27900266
Foot Ankle Int. 1995 Sep;16(9):542-7
pubmed: 8563921
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Jan-Feb;50(1):25-30
pubmed: 21172639
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Oct;136(10):1343-8
pubmed: 27447881
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):984-988
pubmed: 31176518
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Mar-Apr;54(2):188-91
pubmed: 25116232
Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Aug;20(8):497-500
pubmed: 10473060
J Orthop. 2019 Aug 13;16(5):430-433
pubmed: 31496552
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Apr;23(2 Suppl):139-144
pubmed: 30977880
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 May;33B(2):180-91
pubmed: 14832316
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 28;11(1):24472
pubmed: 34963691
World J Orthop. 2015 Sep 18;6(8):602-13
pubmed: 26396936