Isolated Gastrocnemius Contraction and Gastroc Recession Surgery in Case of Planter Fasciitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gastrocnemius recession
Meta-analysis
Planter fasciitis
Surgery
VAS scale
Journal
Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
28
02
2023
accepted:
17
06
2023
pmc-release:
04
08
2024
medline:
23
8
2023
pubmed:
23
8
2023
entrez:
23
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The current systematic and meta-static review aimed to analyze the correlation between isolated gastrocnemius contracture and plantar fasciitis and the effectiveness of gastroc recession surgery in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to conduct this meta-analysis. A literature search was carried out on the following databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases with the appropriate medical subject headings (MeSH) to identify the eligible articles. A total of 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. In this study, there is a significant difference in chronic plantar fasciitis outcome when comparing experimental and control (RR: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.05; In conclusion, the current systematic review and meta-analysis of gastrocnemius recession and proximal medial gastrocnemius release and other treatment measures for plantar fasciitis suggests that the improvement of ankle dorsiflexion, reduction in pain, and patient satisfaction are almost similar in all the treatment measures. Among the five treatment measures, gastrocnemius recession remains the best, followed by proximal medial gastrocnemius release.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37609028
doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00939-x
pii: 939
pmc: PMC10441881
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1359-1375Informations de copyright
© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;61(2):396-400
pubmed: 34838458
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Mar;41(3):267-274
pubmed: 31808359
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jan;33(1):14-9
pubmed: 22381231
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Dec;39(12):1423-1431
pubmed: 30132688
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jul-Aug;60(4):733-737
pubmed: 33771432
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jan;42(1):76-82
pubmed: 32924578
Am Fam Physician. 2018 Sep 1;98(5):298-303
pubmed: 30216025
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Jan;32(1):5-8
pubmed: 21288428
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jul;27(5):543-549
pubmed: 32773360
Foot Ankle Spec. 2018 Aug;11(4):330-334
pubmed: 29025282
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;38(4):A1-A18
pubmed: 18434670
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 3;17(1):409
pubmed: 27716217
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Mar;39(3):271-277
pubmed: 29198141
Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1845-50
pubmed: 23959221
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 May;31(5):377-84
pubmed: 20460063
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;45(4):265-72
pubmed: 25739844
Int Orthop. 2013 May;37(5):839-42
pubmed: 23250352
Foot (Edinb). 2017 Aug;32:8-14
pubmed: 28605621
Z Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;76(5):443-450
pubmed: 28236094
Reumatol Clin. 2007 Jul;3(4):159-65
pubmed: 21794421
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Nov;27(9):917-23
pubmed: 22819670
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Oct;33(10):915-21
pubmed: 23050719
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Dec;24(6):471-473
pubmed: 29409193