Personalising monitoring for chemotherapy patients through predicting deterioration in renal and hepatic function.
chemotherapy
hepatic
machine learning
renal
treatment-dose
Journal
Cancer medicine
ISSN: 2045-7634
Titre abrégé: Cancer Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595310
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
received:
22
05
2023
accepted:
26
07
2023
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
23
8
2023
entrez:
23
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In those receiving chemotherapy, renal and hepatic dysfunction can increase the risk of toxicity and should therefore be monitored. We aimed to develop a machine learning model to identify those patients that need closer monitoring, enabling a safer and more efficient service. We used retrospective data from a large academic hospital, for patients treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and diffuse-large B-cell lymphoma, to train and validate a Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP) model to predict the outcomes of unacceptable rises in bilirubin or creatinine. To assess the performance of the model, validation was performed using patient data from a separate, independent hospital using the same variables. Using this dataset, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the model. 1214 patients in total were identified. The training set had almost perfect sensitivity and specificity of >0.95; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00) for creatinine and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) for bilirubin. The validation set had good sensitivity (creatinine: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.55-0.64, bilirubin: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.52-0.56), and specificity (creatinine 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99, bilirubin 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and area under the curve (creatinine: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.82, bilirubin 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76). We have demonstrated that a MLP model can be used to reduce the number of blood tests required for some patients at low risk of organ dysfunction, whilst improving safety for others at high risk.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In those receiving chemotherapy, renal and hepatic dysfunction can increase the risk of toxicity and should therefore be monitored. We aimed to develop a machine learning model to identify those patients that need closer monitoring, enabling a safer and more efficient service.
METHODS
We used retrospective data from a large academic hospital, for patients treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and diffuse-large B-cell lymphoma, to train and validate a Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP) model to predict the outcomes of unacceptable rises in bilirubin or creatinine. To assess the performance of the model, validation was performed using patient data from a separate, independent hospital using the same variables. Using this dataset, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the model.
RESULTS
1214 patients in total were identified. The training set had almost perfect sensitivity and specificity of >0.95; the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00) for creatinine and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) for bilirubin. The validation set had good sensitivity (creatinine: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.55-0.64, bilirubin: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.52-0.56), and specificity (creatinine 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-0.99, bilirubin 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and area under the curve (creatinine: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.82, bilirubin 0.72, 95% CI: 0.68-0.76).
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that a MLP model can be used to reduce the number of blood tests required for some patients at low risk of organ dysfunction, whilst improving safety for others at high risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37610318
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6418
pmc: PMC10524043
doi:
Substances chimiques
Creatinine
AYI8EX34EU
Bilirubin
RFM9X3LJ49
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17856-17865Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2007 Dec;13(4):207-21
pubmed: 18045780
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):441-7
pubmed: 26181251
Biom J. 2020 Jul;62(4):932-944
pubmed: 31957077
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):15-15l
pubmed: 31340008
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441
pubmed: 32188600
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 24;9(5):e25237
pubmed: 34028357
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jun;20(6):769-780
pubmed: 31078462
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 8;12(1):5979
pubmed: 35395867
ESMO Open. 2023 Feb;8(1):100743
pubmed: 36542904
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29
pubmed: 30617335
Oncologist. 2001;6(2):162-76
pubmed: 11306728
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1995 Dec;24(4):969-90
pubmed: 8749907
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Nov 26;8:53
pubmed: 19036144
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(17):17856-17865
pubmed: 37610318
BMC Med. 2015 Jan 06;13:1
pubmed: 25563062
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307
pubmed: 29209603
Int J Oncol. 2019 Feb;54(2):407-419
pubmed: 30570109
Diagn Progn Res. 2019 Oct 04;3:18
pubmed: 31592444
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180926
pubmed: 30646043
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(22):7996-8004
pubmed: 34581509
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Apr;20(4):e200-e207
pubmed: 30942181