Closed-Loop ventilation using sidestream versus mainstream capnography for automated adjustments of minute ventilation-A randomized clinical trial in cardiac surgery patients.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
04
05
2023
accepted:
18
07
2023
medline:
25
8
2023
pubmed:
23
8
2023
entrez:
23
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop ventilation mode that uses capnography to adjust tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate according to a user-set end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) target range. We compared sidestream versus mainstream capnography with this ventilation mode with respect to the quality of breathing in patients after cardiac surgery. Single-center, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial in adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery that were expected to receive at least two hours of postoperative ventilation in the ICU. Patients were randomized 1:1 to closed-loop ventilation with sidestream or mainstream capnography. Each breath was classified into a zone based on the measured VT, maximum airway pressure, etCO2 and pulse oximetry. The primary outcome was the proportion of breaths spent in a predefined 'optimal' zone of ventilation during the first three hours of postoperative ventilation, with a non-inferiority margin for the difference in the proportions set at -20%. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of breaths in predefined 'acceptable' and 'critical' zones of ventilation, and the proportion of breaths with hypoxemia. Of 80 randomized subjects, 78 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. We could not confirm the non-inferiority of closed-loop ventilation using sidestream with respect to the proportion of breaths in the 'optimal' zone (mean ratio 0.87 [0.77 to ∞]; P = 0.116 for non-inferiority). The proportion of breaths with hypoxemia was higher in the sidestream capnography group versus the mainstream capnography group. We could not confirm that INTELLiVENT-ASV using sidestream capnography is non-inferior to INTELLiVENT-ASV using mainstream capnography with respect to the quality of breathing in subjects receiving postoperative ventilation after cardiac surgery. NCT04599491 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop ventilation mode that uses capnography to adjust tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate according to a user-set end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) target range. We compared sidestream versus mainstream capnography with this ventilation mode with respect to the quality of breathing in patients after cardiac surgery.
METHODS
Single-center, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial in adult patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery that were expected to receive at least two hours of postoperative ventilation in the ICU. Patients were randomized 1:1 to closed-loop ventilation with sidestream or mainstream capnography. Each breath was classified into a zone based on the measured VT, maximum airway pressure, etCO2 and pulse oximetry. The primary outcome was the proportion of breaths spent in a predefined 'optimal' zone of ventilation during the first three hours of postoperative ventilation, with a non-inferiority margin for the difference in the proportions set at -20%. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of breaths in predefined 'acceptable' and 'critical' zones of ventilation, and the proportion of breaths with hypoxemia.
RESULTS
Of 80 randomized subjects, 78 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. We could not confirm the non-inferiority of closed-loop ventilation using sidestream with respect to the proportion of breaths in the 'optimal' zone (mean ratio 0.87 [0.77 to ∞]; P = 0.116 for non-inferiority). The proportion of breaths with hypoxemia was higher in the sidestream capnography group versus the mainstream capnography group.
CONCLUSIONS
We could not confirm that INTELLiVENT-ASV using sidestream capnography is non-inferior to INTELLiVENT-ASV using mainstream capnography with respect to the quality of breathing in subjects receiving postoperative ventilation after cardiac surgery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04599491 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37611007
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289412
pii: PONE-D-23-13402
pmc: PMC10446221
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04599491']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0289412Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Nijbroek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MJS was a part–time employee of Hamilton Medical AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland, where he was the team leader of the department of research and new technologies from January 2022 to January 2023. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):109-17
pubmed: 27317710
Anaesthesia. 2003 Feb;58(2):149-55
pubmed: 12562411
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Jun 24;109:724-9
pubmed: 13934289
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):e27
pubmed: 23134404
J Intensive Care. 2022 Mar 18;10(1):17
pubmed: 35303968
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Nov;15(11):1403-1413
pubmed: 34047244
Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):631-41
pubmed: 23619172
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Mar;39(3):463-71
pubmed: 23338569
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):739-749
pubmed: 32739044
J Clin Monit. 1992 Apr;8(2):139-41
pubmed: 1583550
Anesth Analg. 2008 Sep;107(3):890-904
pubmed: 18713902
Anesth Analg. 1994 Mar;78(3):584-6
pubmed: 8109779
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Jun;55(6):1468-1473
pubmed: 32187888
Crit Care Med. 1989 Jun;17(6):560-2
pubmed: 2498039
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jun;82(6):657-68
pubmed: 26957117
Can J Anaesth. 1990 Apr;37(3):322-6
pubmed: 2108814
J Appl Physiol. 1950 May;2(11):592-607
pubmed: 15436363
Pediatrics. 2008 Dec;122(6):e1219-24
pubmed: 19029196
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):304-305
pubmed: 29342382
Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):781-7
pubmed: 22460854
Trials. 2022 Apr 23;23(1):348
pubmed: 35461264
Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):752-3
pubmed: 24577110
Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):576-585
pubmed: 26447854
Respir Care. 2013 Jul;58(7):1152-6
pubmed: 23322889