Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography for Detection of Narrow Angles: A Community-Based Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Anterior eye segment Glaucoma, angle-closure Sensitivity and specificity Tomography, optical

Journal

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
ISSN: 2589-4196
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Glaucoma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101730510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 07 07 2023
revised: 13 08 2023
accepted: 14 08 2023
pubmed: 24 8 2023
medline: 24 8 2023
entrez: 23 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) screening for detecting gonioscopically narrow angles. Population-based cross-sectional study. A stratified random sample of individuals aged ≥ 60 years, selected from a door-to-door census performed in low-lying Nepal. Participants underwent AS-OCT, posterior segment OCT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) testing in the community. Those meeting referral criteria in either eye were invited to have a comprehensive eye examination including gonioscopy. Referral criteria included (i) the lowest 2.5% of AS-OCT measurements, (ii) retinal OCT results suggestive of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, or age-related macular degeneration, and (iii) elevated IOP. Sensitivity and specificity of 5 semiautomated AS-OCT parameters relative to gonioscopically narrow angles, defined as the absence of visible trabecular meshwork for ≥ 180° on nonindentation gonioscopy. Of 17 656 people aged ≥ 60 years enumerated from 102 communities, 12 633 (71.6%) presented for AS-OCT testing. Referral was recommended for 697 participants based on AS-OCT criteria and 2419 participants based on other criteria, of which 858 had gonioscopy performed by a glaucoma specialist. Each of the 5 AS-OCT parameters offered good diagnostic information for predicting eyes with gonioscopically narrow angles, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.89. The angle opening distance at 750 μm from the scleral spur (AOD750) provided the most diagnostic information, providing an optimal sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75%-96%) and specificity of 77% (71%-83%) at a cutpoint of 367 μm, and a sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 54%-74%) when specificity was constrained to 90% (cutpoint, 283 μm). On AS-OCT, the AOD750 parameter detected approximately two-thirds of cases of gonioscopically narrow angles when test specificity was set to 90%. Although such a sensitivity may not be sufficient when screening solely for narrow angles, AS-OCT requires little additional effort if posterior segment OCT is already being performed and thus could provide incremental benefit when performing OCT-based screening. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37611749
pii: S2589-4196(23)00159-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.08.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 EY028097
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sangita Pradhan (S)

Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.

Ranjeet K Sah (RK)

Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.

Gopal Bhandari (G)

Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.

Sadhan Bhandari (S)

Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.

Raghunandan Byanju (R)

Bharatpur Eye Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal.

Ram P Kandel (RP)

Seva Foundation, Berkeley, California.

Isabel J B Thompson (IJB)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Valerie M Stevens (VM)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Krisianne M Aromin (KM)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Julius T Oatts (JT)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Yvonne Ou (Y)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Thomas M Lietman (TM)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Kieran S O'Brien (KS)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Jeremy D Keenan (JD)

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, California; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: jeremy.keenan@ucsf.edu.

Classifications MeSH