Non-cell-autonomous cancer progression from chromosomal instability.
Humans
Benchmarking
Cell Communication
Chromosomal Instability
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Disease Progression
Melanoma
/ drug therapy
Tumor Microenvironment
Interferon Type I
/ immunology
Neoplasm Metastasis
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
Signal Transduction
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Neoplasms
/ genetics
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
accepted:
20
07
2023
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
24
8
2023
entrez:
23
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a driver of cancer metastasis
Identifiants
pubmed: 37612508
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06464-z
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-06464-z
pmc: PMC10468402
doi:
Substances chimiques
cGAS protein, human
EC 2.7.7.-
STING1 protein, human
0
Interferon Type I
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1080-1088Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA280414
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA263381
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA280572
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA266660
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA256188
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Li, J. et al. Metastasis and immune evasion from extracellular cGAMP hydrolysis. Cancer Discov. 11, 1212–1227 (2021).
Bakhoum, S. F. et al. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature 553, 467–472 (2018).
Bakhoum, S. F. & Cantley, L. C. The multifaceted role of chromosomal instability in cancer and its microenvironment. Cell 174, 1347–1360 (2018).
pubmed: 30193109
pmcid: 6136429
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.027
Wormann, S. M. et al. APOBEC3A drives deaminase domain-independent chromosomal instability to promote pancreatic cancer metastasis. Nat. Cancer 2, 1338–1356 (2021).
pubmed: 35121902
doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00268-8
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386, 623–627 (1997).
pubmed: 9121588
doi: 10.1038/386623a0
Lee, A. J. et al. Chromosomal instability confers intrinsic multidrug resistance. Cancer Res. 71, 1858–1870 (2011).
pubmed: 21363922
pmcid: 3059493
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3604
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689 e673 (2018).
pubmed: 29622463
pmcid: 6028190
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.007
Davoli, T., Uno, H., Wooten, E. C. & Elledge, S. J. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8399 (2017).
Bakhoum, S. F. et al. The mitotic origin of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol. 24, R148–149 (2014).
pubmed: 24556433
pmcid: 3970164
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.019
Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 180, 665–672 (2008).
pubmed: 18283116
pmcid: 2265570
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200712029
Santaguida, S. et al. Chromosome mis-segregation generates cell-cycle-arrested cells with complex karyotypes that are eliminated by the immune system. Dev. Cell 41, 638–651 e635 (2017).
pubmed: 28633018
pmcid: 5536848
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.022
Laucius, C. D., Orr, B. & Compton, D. A. Chromosomal instability suppresses the growth of K-Ras-induced lung adenomas. Cell Cycle 18, 1702–1713 (2019).
pubmed: 31179849
pmcid: 6649550
doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1629790
Hoevenaar, W. H. M. et al. Degree and site of chromosomal instability define its oncogenic potential. Nat. Commun. 11, 1501 (2020).
pubmed: 32198375
pmcid: 7083897
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15279-9
Nguyen, B. et al. Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients. Cell 185, 563–575 e511 (2022).
pubmed: 35120664
pmcid: 9147702
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.003
Watkins, T. B. K. et al. Pervasive chromosomal instability and karyotype order in tumour evolution. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2698-6 (2020).
Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L. & Compton, D. A. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 27–35 (2009).
pubmed: 19060894
doi: 10.1038/ncb1809
Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J. & Hetzer, M. W. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei. Cell 154, 47–60 (2013).
pubmed: 23827674
pmcid: 3749778
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.007
Mackenzie, K. J. et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature 548, 461–465 (2017).
pubmed: 28738408
pmcid: 5870830
doi: 10.1038/nature23449
Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017).
pubmed: 28759889
pmcid: 5857357
doi: 10.1038/nature23470
Ablasser, A. & Chen, Z. J. cGAS in action: expanding roles in immunity and inflammation. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8657 (2019).
Moore, A. T. et al. MCAK associates with the tips of polymerizing microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 169, 391–397 (2005).
pubmed: 15883193
pmcid: 2171944
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200411089
Liu, H. et al. Nuclear cGAS suppresses DNA repair and promotes tumorigenesis. Nature 563, 131–136 (2018).
pubmed: 30356214
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0629-6
Jiang, P. et al. Systematic investigation of cytokine signaling activity at the tissue and single-cell levels. Nat. Methods 18, 1181–1191 (2021).
pubmed: 34594031
pmcid: 8493809
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01274-5
Bartneck, M. et al. The CCR2
pubmed: 30704985
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.10.007
Wu, S. Z. et al. A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers. Nat. Genet. 53, 1334–1347 (2021).
pubmed: 34493872
pmcid: 9044823
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00911-1
Dhanda, J. et al. SERPINE1 and SMA expression at the invasive front predict extracapsular spread and survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 111, 2114–2121 (2014).
pubmed: 25268377
pmcid: 4260028
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.500
Jiang, S. et al. Activation of WNT7b autocrine eases metastasis of colorectal cancer via epithelial to mesenchymal transition and predicts poor prognosis. BMC Cancer 21, 180 (2021).
pubmed: 33607955
pmcid: 7893751
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07898-2
Acharyya, S. et al. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell 150, 165–178 (2012).
pubmed: 22770218
pmcid: 3528019
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.042
Lim, S. Y., Yuzhalin, A. E., Gordon-Weeks, A. N. & Muschel, R. J. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 signaling axis in cancer metastasis. Oncotarget 7, 28697–28710 (2016).
pubmed: 26885690
pmcid: 5053756
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7376
Johnstone, C. N., Chand, A., Putoczki, T. L. & Ernst, M. Emerging roles for IL-11 signaling in cancer development and progression: focus on breast cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 26, 489–498 (2015).
pubmed: 26209885
doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.015
Hong, C. et al. cGAS-STING drives the IL-6-dependent survival of chromosomally instable cancers. Nature 607, 366–373 (2022).
pubmed: 35705809
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04847-2
Adamson, B. et al. A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell 167, 1867–1882 e1821 (2016).
pubmed: 27984733
pmcid: 5315571
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048
Haag, S. M. et al. Targeting STING with covalent small-molecule inhibitors. Nature 559, 269–273 (2018).
pubmed: 29973723
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0287-8
Dou, Z. et al. Cytoplasmic chromatin triggers inflammation in senescence and cancer. Nature 550, 402–406 (2017).
pubmed: 28976970
pmcid: 5850938
doi: 10.1038/nature24050
Gui, X. et al. Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature 567, 262–266 (2019).
pubmed: 30842662
pmcid: 9417302
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1006-9
Ishikawa, H., Ma, Z. & Barber, G. N. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 461, 788–792 (2009).
pubmed: 19776740
pmcid: 4664154
doi: 10.1038/nature08476
Wang, R. W., Vigano, S., Ben-David, U., Amon, A. & Santaguida, S. Aneuploid senescent cells activate NF-κB to promote their immune clearance by NK cells. EMBO Rep. 22, e52032 (2021).
pubmed: 34105235
pmcid: 8339690
doi: 10.15252/embr.202052032
Wang, H. et al. cGAS is essential for the antitumor effect of immune checkpoint blockade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1637–1642 (2017).
pubmed: 28137885
pmcid: 5320994
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621363114
Ranoa, D. R. E. et al. STING promotes homeostasis via regulation of cell proliferation and chromosomal stability. Cancer Res. 79, 1465–1479 (2019).
pubmed: 30482772
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1972
Nassour, J. et al. Autophagic cell death restricts chromosomal instability during replicative crisis. Nature 565, 659–663 (2019).
pubmed: 30675059
pmcid: 6557118
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0885-0
Hu, J. et al. STING inhibits the reactivation of dormant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05880-5 (2023).
Rosenthal, R. et al. Neoantigen-directed immune escape in lung cancer evolution. Nature 567, 479–485 (2019).
pubmed: 30894752
pmcid: 6954100
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1032-7
Fujiwara, T. et al. Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437, 1043–1047 (2005).
pubmed: 16222300
doi: 10.1038/nature04217
Ahn, J. et al. Inflammation-driven carcinogenesis is mediated through STING. Nat. Commun. 5, 5166 (2014).
pubmed: 25300616
doi: 10.1038/ncomms6166
Lemos, H. et al. STING promotes the growth of tumors characterized by low antigenicity via IDO activation. Cancer Res. 76, 2076–2081 (2016).
pubmed: 26964621
pmcid: 4873329
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1456
Foijer, F. et al. Chromosome instability induced by Mps1 and p53 mutation generates aggressive lymphomas exhibiting aneuploidy-induced stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13427–13432 (2014).
pubmed: 25197064
pmcid: 4169945
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400892111
Foijer, F. et al. Deletion of the MAD2L1 spindle assembly checkpoint gene is tolerated in mouse models of acute T-cell lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20873 (2017).
Shoshani, O. et al. Transient genomic instability drives tumorigenesis through accelerated clonal evolution. Genes Dev. 35, 1093–1108 (2021).
pubmed: 34266887
pmcid: 8336898
doi: 10.1101/gad.348319.121
Frittoli, E. et al. Tissue fluidification promotes a cGAS-STING cytosolic DNA response in invasive breast cancer. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-022-01431-x (2022).
Meric-Bernstam, F. et al. Phase I dose-escalation trial of MIW815 (ADU-S100), an intratumoral STING agonist, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 677–688 (2022).
pubmed: 34716197
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1963
Meric-Bernstam, F. et al. Combination of the STING agonist MIW815 (ADU-S100) and PD-1 inhibitor spartalizumab in advanced/metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas: an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib study. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 110–121 (2023).
pubmed: 36282874
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2235
Lama, L. et al. Development of human cGAS-specific small-molecule inhibitors for repression of dsDNA-triggered interferon expression. Nat. Commun. 10, 2261 (2019).
pubmed: 31113940
pmcid: 6529454
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08620-4
Calvo, V. et al. Discovery of 2-amino-3-amido-5-aryl-pyridines as highly potent, orally bioavailable, and efficacious PERK kinase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 43, 128058 (2021).
pubmed: 33895276
doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2021.128058
Duits, D. E. M., Wellenstein, M. D. & de Visser, K. E. In vitro assessment of cancer cell-induced polarization of macrophages. Methods Enzymol. 632, 133–154 (2020).
pubmed: 32000893
doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2019.06.011
Tozbikian, G. et al. Mesothelin expression in triple negative breast carcinomas correlates significantly with basal-like phenotype, distant metastases and decreased survival. PLoS ONE 9, e114900 (2014).
pubmed: 25506917
pmcid: 4266616
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114900
Yarilin, D. et al. Machine-based method for multiplex in situ molecular characterization of tissues by immunofluorescence detection. Sci. Rep. 5, 9534 (2015).
pubmed: 25826597
pmcid: 4821037
doi: 10.1038/srep09534
Lawrence, M. et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003118 (2013).
pubmed: 23950696
pmcid: 3738458
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Efremova, M., Vento-Tormo, M., Teichmann, S. A. & Vento-Tormo, R. CellPhoneDB: inferring cell-cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand-receptor complexes. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1484–1506 (2020).
pubmed: 32103204
doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0292-x
Shao, X. et al. CellTalkDB: a manually curated database of ligand-receptor interactions in humans and mice. Brief. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa269 (2021).
Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).
pubmed: 26653891
pmcid: 4676162
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0844-5
Musa, A. et al. A review of connectivity map and computational approaches in pharmacogenomics. Brief. Bioinform. 18, 903 (2017).
pubmed: 28334173
pmcid: 6113891
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx023
Dimitrov, D. et al. Comparison of methods and resources for cell-cell communication inference from single-cell RNA-Seq data. Nat. Commun. 13, 3224 (2022).
pubmed: 35680885
pmcid: 9184522
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30755-0
Browaeys, R., Saelens, W. & Saeys, Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat. Methods 17, 159–162 (2020).
pubmed: 31819264
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0667-5
Lummertz da Rocha, E. et al. CellComm infers cellular crosstalk that drives haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell development. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 579–589 (2022).
pubmed: 35414020
doi: 10.1038/s41556-022-00884-1
Guilliams, M. et al. Spatial proteogenomics reveals distinct and evolutionarily conserved hepatic macrophage niches. Cell 185, 379–396 e338 (2022).
pubmed: 35021063
pmcid: 8809252
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.018
Veglia, F., Sanseviero, E. & Gabrilovich, D. I. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the era of increasing myeloid cell diversity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 485–498 (2021).
pubmed: 33526920
pmcid: 7849958
doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00490-y
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
pubmed: 31740819
pmcid: 6884693
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0
Tickle, T., Tirosh, I., Georgescu, C., Brown, M. & Haas, B. inferCNV of the Trinity CTAT Project. Klarman Cell Observatory, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA (2019).
Dann, E., Henderson, N. C., Teichmann, S. A., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Differential abundance testing on single-cell data using k-nearest neighbor graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01033-z (2021).
Elosua-Bayes, M., Nieto, P., Mereu, E., Gut, I. & Heyn, H. SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e50 (2021).
pubmed: 33544846
pmcid: 8136778
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab043
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S. & Bastian, M. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9, e98679 (2014).
pubmed: 24914678
pmcid: 4051631
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
Lange, M. et al. CellRank for directed single-cell fate mapping. Nat. Methods 19, 159–170 (2022).
Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).
pubmed: 19541911
pmcid: 2752132
doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
pubmed: 14597658
pmcid: 403769
doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303