Elucidating the molecular responses to waterlogging stress in onion (

RNA-sequencing differential gene expression onion transcriptome waterlogging

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 25 01 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 24 8 2023
pubmed: 24 8 2023
entrez: 24 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Waterlogging is a major stress that severely affects onion cultivation worldwide, and developing stress-tolerant varieties could be a valuable measure for overcoming its adverse effects. Gathering information regarding the molecular mechanisms and gene expression patterns of waterlogging-tolerant and sensitive genotypes is an effective method for improving stress tolerance in onions. To date, the waterlogging tolerance-governing molecular mechanism in onions is unknown. This study identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through transcriptome analysis in leaf tissue of two onion genotypes (Acc. 1666; tolerant and W-344; sensitive) presenting contrasting responses to waterlogging stress. Differential gene expression analysis revealed that in Acc. 1666, 1629 and 3271 genes were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. In W-344, 2134 and 1909 genes were upregulated and downregulated, respectively, under waterlogging stress. The proteins coded by these DEGs regulate several key biological processes to overcome waterlogging stress such as phytohormone production, antioxidant enzymes, programmed cell death, and energy production. The clusters of orthologous group pathway analysis revealed that DEGs contributed to the post-translational modification, energy production, and carbohydrate metabolism-related pathways under waterlogging stress. The enzyme assay demonstrated higher activity of antioxidant enzymes in Acc. 1666 than in W-344. The differential expression of waterlogging tolerance related genes, such as those related to antioxidant enzymes, phytohormone biosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and transcriptional factors, suggested that significant fine reprogramming of gene expression occurs in response to waterlogging stress in onion. A few genes such as ADH, PDC, PEP carboxylase, WRKY22, and Respiratory burst oxidase D were exclusively upregulated in Acc. 1666. The molecular information about DEGs identified in the present study would be valuable for improving stress tolerance and for developing waterlogging tolerant onion varieties.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37615019
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1150909
pmc: PMC10442827
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1150909

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Gedam, Khandagale, Shirsat, Thangasamy, Kulkarni, Kulkarni, Patil, Barvkar, Mahajan, Gupta, Bhagat, Khade, Singh and Gawande.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Anal Biochem. 1971 Nov;44(1):276-87
pubmed: 4943714
Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;77(3):309-22
pubmed: 21811849
Plant Sci. 2013 Jul;208:102-11
pubmed: 23683935
Plant Cell Physiol. 2010 Jan;51(1):21-37
pubmed: 19923201
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Jan 25;16:28
pubmed: 26811086
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 23;23(3):
pubmed: 35163167
BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 22;18(1):649
pubmed: 28830345
Plants (Basel). 2021 Sep 22;10(10):
pubmed: 34685790
Plant Physiol. 1984 Apr;74(4):846-51
pubmed: 16663520
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 20;24(8):
pubmed: 37108744
J Exp Bot. 2013 Nov;64(14):4589-601
pubmed: 24006421
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0261086
pubmed: 35061680
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 02;12:601771
pubmed: 34276712
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Mar;61(1):61-8
pubmed: 12658516
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 10;13:1048476
pubmed: 36704340
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):1692
pubmed: 32015352
New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(2):289-98
pubmed: 21563365
Science. 2012 Feb 3;335(6068):552-7
pubmed: 22194413
Plant Cell. 2016 Jan;28(1):160-80
pubmed: 26668304
Plant Cell Physiol. 2016 Dec;57(12):2541-2551
pubmed: 27837098
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9256
pubmed: 28835646
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jul 19;7:1044
pubmed: 27486466
Plant Cell. 2012 Sep;24(9):3506-29
pubmed: 23012438
Plant Physiol. 2018 Feb;176(2):1118-1130
pubmed: 29118247
Plant Mol Biol. 2017 Nov;95(4-5):425-439
pubmed: 28924726
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 24;7(1):9341
pubmed: 28839256
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 10;11:627331
pubmed: 33643336
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Sep 3;503(1):365-370
pubmed: 29894687
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 11;13:857306
pubmed: 35481153
Ann Bot. 2019 Mar 14;123(4):691-705
pubmed: 30535180
J Proteomics. 2016 Feb 05;133:33-47
pubmed: 26655678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):E6085-E6094
pubmed: 29891679
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 23;24(7):
pubmed: 37046988
Plant Cell. 2013 Jul;25(7):2699-713
pubmed: 23897923
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Oct;155:243-251
pubmed: 32781274
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0237457
pubmed: 32780764
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 09;9:1928
pubmed: 30687344
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968 Apr;125(1):189-98
pubmed: 5655425
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 8;7(1):10950
pubmed: 28887464
Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):535-50
pubmed: 27104977
Sci Rep. 2023 May 3;13(1):7212
pubmed: 37137877
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Mar;148:228-236
pubmed: 31981875
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Nov 09;18(11):
pubmed: 29120390
J Exp Bot. 2012 Apr;63(7):2667-79
pubmed: 22268143
Plant Physiol. 1997 Sep;115(1):137-49
pubmed: 9306697
Plant Physiol. 2015 Sep;169(1):32-41
pubmed: 26103991
J Exp Bot. 2014 Mar;65(5):1229-40
pubmed: 24253197
J Exp Bot. 2010 Aug;61(13):3563-75
pubmed: 20643807
Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;11(7):
pubmed: 35406910
Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):909-22
pubmed: 15923321
Plant Cell Rep. 2017 Jun;36(6):947-957
pubmed: 28337518
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Sep 29;15(10):17622-43
pubmed: 25268626
Genomics. 2012 Mar;99(3):160-8
pubmed: 22240004
Genomics. 2021 Jul;113(4):2583-2590
pubmed: 34111522
Plant J. 2020 Jul;103(1):227-247
pubmed: 32064696
Plants (Basel). 2020 Feb 13;9(2):
pubmed: 32069892
Front Plant Sci. 2020 May 15;11:566
pubmed: 32499803
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016 Sep;106:244-52
pubmed: 27191596
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 23;9:e11861
pubmed: 34386306
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 05;12:727262
pubmed: 35069612
Nature. 2011 Oct 23;479(7373):415-8
pubmed: 22020279
Plant Physiol. 2015 Sep;169(1):180-93
pubmed: 26036614
Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1-15
pubmed: 16654194

Auteurs

Pranjali A Gedam (PA)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Kiran Khandagale (K)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Dhananjay Shirsat (D)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

A Thangasamy (A)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Onkar Kulkarni (O)

Bioinformatics Centre, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

Abhijeet Kulkarni (A)

Bioinformatics Centre, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

Swaranjali S Patil (SS)

Department of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

Vitthal T Barvkar (VT)

Department of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

Vijay Mahajan (V)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Amar Jeet Gupta (AJ)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Kiran P Bhagat (KP)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Floriculture Research, Pune, India.

Yogesh P Khade (YP)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Major Singh (M)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Suresh Gawande (S)

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Pune, India.

Classifications MeSH