Saliency-Enhanced Content-Based Image Retrieval for Diagnosis Support in Dermatology Consultation: Reader Study.

algorithms convolutional neural network deep learning dermatology dermoscopic images dermoscopy diagnosis image retrieval melanoma saliency maps skin cancer

Journal

JMIR dermatology
ISSN: 2562-0959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Dermatol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101770607

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 24 08 2022
accepted: 16 06 2023
revised: 07 04 2023
medline: 24 8 2023
pubmed: 24 8 2023
entrez: 24 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous research studies have demonstrated that medical content image retrieval can play an important role by assisting dermatologists in skin lesion diagnosis. However, current state-of-the-art approaches have not been adopted in routine consultation, partly due to the lack of interpretability limiting trust by clinical users. This study developed a new image retrieval architecture for polarized or dermoscopic imaging guided by interpretable saliency maps. This approach provides better feature extraction, leading to better quantitative retrieval performance as well as providing interpretability for an eventual real-world implementation. Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) algorithms rely on the comparison of image features embedded by convolutional neural network (CNN) against a labeled data set. Saliency maps are computer vision-interpretable methods that highlight the most relevant regions for the prediction made by a neural network. By introducing a fine-tuning stage that includes saliency maps to guide feature extraction, the accuracy of image retrieval is optimized. We refer to this approach as saliency-enhanced CBIR (SE-CBIR). A reader study was designed at the University Hospital Zurich Dermatology Clinic to evaluate SE-CBIR's retrieval accuracy as well as the impact of the participant's confidence on the diagnosis. SE-CBIR improved the retrieval accuracy by 7% (77% vs 84%) when doing single-lesion retrieval against traditional CBIR. The reader study showed an overall increase in classification accuracy of 22% (62% vs 84%) when the participant is provided with SE-CBIR retrieved images. In addition, the overall confidence in the lesion's diagnosis increased by 24%. Finally, the use of SE-CBIR as a support tool helped the participants reduce the number of nonmelanoma lesions previously diagnosed as melanoma (overdiagnosis) by 53%. SE-CBIR presents better retrieval accuracy compared to traditional CBIR CNN-based approaches. Furthermore, we have shown how these support tools can help dermatologists and residents improve diagnosis accuracy and confidence. Additionally, by introducing interpretable methods, we should expect increased acceptance and use of these tools in routine consultation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous research studies have demonstrated that medical content image retrieval can play an important role by assisting dermatologists in skin lesion diagnosis. However, current state-of-the-art approaches have not been adopted in routine consultation, partly due to the lack of interpretability limiting trust by clinical users.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study developed a new image retrieval architecture for polarized or dermoscopic imaging guided by interpretable saliency maps. This approach provides better feature extraction, leading to better quantitative retrieval performance as well as providing interpretability for an eventual real-world implementation.
METHODS METHODS
Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) algorithms rely on the comparison of image features embedded by convolutional neural network (CNN) against a labeled data set. Saliency maps are computer vision-interpretable methods that highlight the most relevant regions for the prediction made by a neural network. By introducing a fine-tuning stage that includes saliency maps to guide feature extraction, the accuracy of image retrieval is optimized. We refer to this approach as saliency-enhanced CBIR (SE-CBIR). A reader study was designed at the University Hospital Zurich Dermatology Clinic to evaluate SE-CBIR's retrieval accuracy as well as the impact of the participant's confidence on the diagnosis.
RESULTS RESULTS
SE-CBIR improved the retrieval accuracy by 7% (77% vs 84%) when doing single-lesion retrieval against traditional CBIR. The reader study showed an overall increase in classification accuracy of 22% (62% vs 84%) when the participant is provided with SE-CBIR retrieved images. In addition, the overall confidence in the lesion's diagnosis increased by 24%. Finally, the use of SE-CBIR as a support tool helped the participants reduce the number of nonmelanoma lesions previously diagnosed as melanoma (overdiagnosis) by 53%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
SE-CBIR presents better retrieval accuracy compared to traditional CBIR CNN-based approaches. Furthermore, we have shown how these support tools can help dermatologists and residents improve diagnosis accuracy and confidence. Additionally, by introducing interpretable methods, we should expect increased acceptance and use of these tools in routine consultation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37616039
pii: v6i1e42129
doi: 10.2196/42129
pmc: PMC10485719
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e42129

Informations de copyright

©Mathias Gassner, Javier Barranco Garcia, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Fabio Bertoldo, Fabienne Fröhlich, Matthias Guckenberger, Silvia Haueis, Christin Pelzer, Mauricio Reyes, Patrick Schmithausen, Dario Simic, Ramon Staeger, Fabio Verardi, Nicolaus Andratschke, Andreas Adelmann, Ralph P Braun. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 24.08.2023.

Références

Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 1;12(1):20732
pubmed: 36456605
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Feb 17;13(581):
pubmed: 33597262
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5193
pubmed: 33664367
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1229-1234
pubmed: 32572267
Skin Res Technol. 2008 Feb;14(1):53-64
pubmed: 18211602
Eur J Cancer. 2022 May;167:54-69
pubmed: 35390650
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Feb;73(1):1-23
pubmed: 15036075
Arch Dermatol. 2011 Nov;147(11):1269-75
pubmed: 21768448
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Aug;29(8):1493-9
pubmed: 25491768
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 02;7:233
pubmed: 32671078
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jul;181(1):155-165
pubmed: 30207594
Med Image Anal. 2022 Oct;81:102551
pubmed: 35932546
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 May 1;158(5):495-503
pubmed: 35353115
Sci Data. 2018 Aug 14;5:180161
pubmed: 30106392
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Jul;26(4):503-512
pubmed: 31845429

Auteurs

Mathias Gassner (M)

Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Physics Department, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Javier Barranco Garcia (J)

Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Stephanie Tanadini-Lang (S)

Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Fabio Bertoldo (F)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Fabienne Fröhlich (F)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Matthias Guckenberger (M)

Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Silvia Haueis (S)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Christin Pelzer (C)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Mauricio Reyes (M)

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Patrick Schmithausen (P)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Dario Simic (D)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Ramon Staeger (R)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Fabio Verardi (F)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Nicolaus Andratschke (N)

Department of Radio Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Andreas Adelmann (A)

Laboratory for Scientific Computing and Modelling, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland.

Ralph P Braun (RP)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH