Peak Running Velocity vs. Critical Speed: Which One Is Better to Prescribe Endurance Training to Recreational Runners?
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2023
01 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
24
8
2023
entrez:
24
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Figueiredo, DH, Figueiredo, DH, Manoel, FA, and Machado, FA. Peak running velocity vs. critical speed: which one is better to prescribe endurance training to recreational runners? J Strength Cond Res 37(9): 1783-1788, 2023-This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 5 weeks of training prescribed by peak running velocity obtained on the track (Vpeak_TR) and their respective time limit (Tlim), as well as by critical speed (CS), on physiological and endurance performance parameters in recreational runners. Twenty-two male runners were distributed into a Vpeak_TR group (GVP) and CS group (GCS) with a predefined program, alternating moderate-intensity continuous training and high-intensity interval training. Maximum oxygen uptake (V̇O2max), and its respective velocity (vV̇O2max), Vpeak_TR, Tlim at 100% Vpeak_TR, 5-km running performance, CS, and D' (maximum distance covered above CS) were assessed at pretraining and posttraining period. There was a significant increase from pretraining to posttraining in Vpeak_TR (GVP = 4.5 ± 3.1% vs. GCS = 7.5 ± 4.2%), vV̇O2max (GVP = 3.9 ± 3.8% vs. GCS = 8.6 ± 6.7%), and mean velocity 5-km (GVP = 5.6 ± 3.3% vs. GCS = 7.3 ± 3.5%) and decrease in 5-km time (GVP = -5.1 ± 3.0% vs. GCS = -6.8 ± 3.0%). CS and V̇O2max significantly improved in GCS (9.3 ± 8.4% and 6.0 ± 6.8%, respectively), with no difference for GVP (2.8 ± 5.6% and 1.3 ± 8.4%, respectively). No differences were observed between groups for all variables. These findings give further supports to the notion that both variables obtained on the track are valid tools to prescribed training in recreational runners.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37616536
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004452
pii: 00124278-202309000-00008
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1783-1788Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Bergstrom HC, Housh TJ, Cochrane-Snyman KC, et al. A model for identifying intensity zones above critical velocity. J Strength Cond Res 31: 3260–3265, 2017.
Billat VL, Flechet B, Petit B, Muriaux G, Koralsztein JP. Interval training at V̇O2max: Effects on aerobic performance and overtraining markers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 156–163, 1999.
Billat V, Renoux JC, Pinoteau J, Petit B, Koralsztein JP. Times to exhaustion at 90,100 and 105% of velocity at V̇O2max (Maximal aerobic speed) and critical speed in elite long distance runners. Arch Physiol Biochem 103: 129–135, 1995.
Billat LV, Koralsztein JP. Significance of the velocity at V̇O2max, and time to exhaustion at this velocity. Sports Med 22: 90–108, 1996.
Billat VL, Morton RH, Blondel N, et al. Oxygen kinetics and modelling of time to exhaustion whilst running at various velocities at maximal oxygen uptake. Eur J Appl Physiol 82: 178–187, 2000.
Buchheit M, Chivot A, Parouty J, et al. Monitoring endurance running performance using cardiac parasympathetic function. Eur J Appl Physiol 108: 1153–1167, 2010.
Bull AJ, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Rana SR. Physiological responses at five estimates of critical velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol 102: 711–720, 2008.
Carter H, Pringle JSM, Jones AM, Doust JH. Oxygen uptake kinetics during treadmill running across exercise intensity domains. Eur J Appl Physiol 86: 347–354, 2002.
Clark IE, West BM, Reynolds SK, Murray SR, Pettitt RW. Applying the critical velocity model for an off-season interval training program. J Strength Cond Res 27: 3335–3341, 2013.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
Da Silva DF, Ferraro ZM, Adamo KB, Machado FA. Endurance running training individually-guided by HRV in untrained women. J Strength Cond Res 33: 736–746, 2019.
Da Silva DF, Simões HG, Machado FA. vV̇O2max versus Vpeak, what is the best predictor of running performances in middle-aged recreationally-trained runners? Sci Sports 30: e85–e92, 2015.
Denadai BS, Ortiz MJ, Greco CC, De Mello MT. Interval training at 95% and 100% of the velocity at VO2max: Effects on aerobic physiological indexes and running performance. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 31: 737–743, 2006.
Figueiredo DH, Figueiredo DH, Manoel FdA, Machado FA. Peak running velocity or critical speed under field conditions: Which best predicts 5-km running performance in recreational runners? Front Physiol 12: 680790, 2021.
Gaesser GA, Poole DC. The slow component of oxygen uptake kinetics in humans. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 24: 35–70, 1996.
Galbraith A, Hopker J, Lelliott S, Diddams L, Passfield L. A single-visit field test of critical speed. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9: 931–935, 2014.
Galbraith A, Jg H, Jobson SA, Passfield L. A novel field test to determine critical speed. J Sports Med Doping Stud 01: 1–4, 2011.
Galbraith A, Hopker J, Passfield L. Modeling intermittent running from a single-visit field test. Int J Sports Med 36: 365–370, 2015.
Helgerud J, Hoydal K, Wang E, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve V̇O2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39: 665–671, 2007.
Hill DW, Poole DC, Smith JC. The relationship between power and the time to achieve VO2max. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 709–714, 2002.
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise Science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 3–12, 2009.
Hottenrott K, Ludyga S, Schulze S. Effects of high intensity training and continuous endurance training on aerobic capacity and body composition in recreationally active runners. J Sports Sci Med 11: 483–488, 2012.
Housh TJ, Cramer JT, Bull AJ, Johnson GO, Housh DJ. The effect of mathematical modeling on critical velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol 84: 469–475, 2001.
Hughson RL, Orok CJ, Staudt LE. A high velocity treadmill running test to assess endurance running potential. Int J Sports Med 05: 23–25, 1984.
Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr 40: 497–504, 1978.
Jones AM, Doust JH. A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 14: 321–327, 1996.
Kuipers H, Rietjens G, Verstappen F, Schoenmakers H, Hofman G. Effects of stage duration in incremental running tests on physiological variables. Int J Sports Med 24: 486–491, 2003.
Léger L, Boucher R. An indirect continuous running multistage field test: The université de Montreal track test. Can J Appl Sport Sci 5: 77–84, 1980.
Machado FA, Kravchychyn ACP, Peserico CS, Da Silva DF, Mezzaroba PV. Incremental test design, peak 'aerobic' running speed and endurance performance in runners. J Sci Med Sport 16: 577–582, 2013.
MacInnis MJ, Gibala MJ. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J Physiol 595: 2915–2930, 2017.
Manoel FA, Da Silva DF, Lima J, Machado FA. Peak velocity and its time limit are as good as the velocity associated with V̇O2max for training prescription in runners. Sports Med Int Open 1: 8–15, 2017.
Manoel FdA, Peserico CS, Machado FA. Novel track field test to determine Vpeak, relationship with treadmill test and 10-km running performance in trained endurance runners. PLoS One 17: e0260338.
McLaughlin JE, Howley ET, Bassett DRJR, Thompson DL, Fitzhugh EC. Test of the classic model for predicting endurance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 991–997, 2010.
Midgley AW, Mcnaughton LR. Time at or near V̇O2max during continuous and intermittent running. A review with special reference to considerations for the optimisation of training protocols to elicit the longest time at or near V̇O2max. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 46: 1–14, 2006.
Monod H, Scherrer J. The work capacity of a synergic muscular group. Ergonomics 8: 329–338, 1965.
Peserico CS, Zagatto AM, Machado FA. Evaluation of the best-designed graded exercise test to assess peak treadmill speed. Int J Sports Med 36: 729–734, 2015.
Peserico CS, Zagatto AM, Machado FA. Effects of endurance running training associated with photobiomodulation on 5-km performance and muscle soreness: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Front Physiol 10: 211, 2019.
Poole DC, Ward SA, Gardner GW, Whipp BJ. Metabolic and respiratory profile of the upper limit for prolonged exercise in man. Ergonomics 31: 1265–1279, 1988.
Saltin B, Strange S. Maximal oxygen uptake: “old” and “new” arguments for a cardiovascular limitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 30–37, 1992.
Siri WE. Tecniques for Measuring Body Composition. Washington: National Academy Press, 1961.
Stratton E, O'Brien BJ, Harvey J, et al. Treadmill velocity best predicts 5000-m run performance. Int J Sports Med 30: 40–45, 2009.
Thomas EJ, Pettitt RW, Kramer M. High-intensity interval training prescribed within the secondary severe-intensity domain improves critical speed but not finite distance capacity. J Sci Sport Exerc 2: 154–166, 2020.
Turnes T, De Aguiar RA, Cruz RSdO, Caputo F. Interval training in the boundaries of severe domain: Effects on aerobic parameters. Eur J Appl Physiol 116: 161–169, 2015.