Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after semi-conversion with graft preservation for failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm Endovascular procedures Failed endovascular aneurysm repair Meta-analysis Reinterventions Semi-conversion Systematic review

Journal

Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 05 06 2023
revised: 24 07 2023
accepted: 15 08 2023
pubmed: 25 8 2023
medline: 25 8 2023
entrez: 24 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after semi-conversion (open conversion with graft preservation) after failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and semi-conversion failure. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major systemic complications, endoleak recurrence, reinterventions, and overall survival. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023421153). All studies reporting the outcomes of semi-conversions for failed EVAR were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. A random effects meta-regression of proportions was conducted using the double arcsine-Tukey transformation, given the frequent zero event rate in the primary outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I Eight studies were included in the review after full text screening. A total of 196 patients underwent semi-conversion at a mean time from EVAR of 47.4 months, 68.9% in an elective setting. Mean age at conversion was 78.1 years, and the main indication was isolated endoleak type II (70.1% of cases). Aortic clamping was not necessary in 92.3% of semi-conversions; the aortic sac was opened in 96.1% of cases; in 93.3% of cases, ligation/suture of one or more culprit arteries were performed; and aortic neck banding was executed in 29.2%. At 30 days from surgery, the pooled mortality and the major systemic complications rates were 5.3% (I Semi-conversions have acceptable 30-day mortality rates, but the early and mid-term risks of complications, reinterventions, ruptures, and infections are not negligible. This procedure might be an alternative to complete or partial graft explant in patients whom aortic cross-clamping is not ideal.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37619915
pii: S0741-5214(23)01926-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.113
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures None.

Auteurs

Davide Esposito (D)

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy; Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: davide.esposito@unifi.it.

Sarah Onida (S)

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Benedict Turner (B)

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Majd Rawashdeh (M)

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Michael P Jenkins (MP)

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Raffaele Pulli (R)

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Alun H Davies (AH)

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH