Evaluation of paravertebral blocks in improving post-procedural pain and decreasing hospital admission after microwave ablation of liver tumors.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2023
24 08 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
accepted:
07
06
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
25
8
2023
entrez:
24
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although ablations are performed with conscious sedation or general anesthesia, microwave ablations can be painful post procedure. Newer analgesic modalities, including regional blocks, have promoted the proliferation of less invasive anesthesia care for ablative procedures. This study evaluates whether bilateral paravertebral blocks reduce the need for additional analgesics in comparison to unilateral blocks in microwave ablations. In this retrospective study, individuals undergoing microwave ablation who underwent unilateral versus bilateral nerve blocks at a single institution from 2017 to 2019 were compared. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared tests. Comparisons of means were completed using multiple T-tests corrected using the Holm-Sidak method with α = 0.05. Regression modeling was used to identify factors related to increased MME (milligram morphine equivalent) usage and post-procedure admission rates. A total of 106 patients undergoing 112 liver MWA procedures were included in this analysis, with patients receiving either a bilateral or unilateral block. Pre-procedural characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in age or gender. Bilateral blocks were associated with decreased usage of gabapentin (14% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) and a lower rate of post-procedure admissions (OR 0.23, p = 0.003). Therefore, when using paravertebral blocks, bilateral blocks are superior to unilateral blocks, as demonstrated by decreased rates of hospital admission and reduced use of systemic neuropathic pain medication. Additionally, reducing post-procedural MME may reduce the rate of admission to the hospital.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37620391
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36607-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-36607-1
pmc: PMC10449898
doi:
Substances chimiques
MME
78185-58-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13854Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 Nov;30(11):559-65
pubmed: 25458045
Radiol Med. 2014 Aug;119(8):549-57
pubmed: 24408042
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1993 Jul-Aug;4(4):539-42
pubmed: 8353352
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Feb;41(2):270-276
pubmed: 29185017
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Jan-Feb;9(1 Pt 1):101-11
pubmed: 9468403
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jan;25(1):97-105.e1-2
pubmed: 24286938
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jul;185(1):51-7
pubmed: 15972398
Anaesthesia. 2010 Dec;65(12):1221-4
pubmed: 20569246
Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):819-21
pubmed: 10690152
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):915-927
pubmed: 29169795
Br J Radiol. 2002 Feb;75(890):105-6
pubmed: 11893632
Anaesthesia. 2010 Nov;65(11):1085-93
pubmed: 20860555
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun;180(6):1537-45
pubmed: 12760914
J Auton Nerv Syst. 1983 Jul;8(3):237-60
pubmed: 6668387
Br J Radiol. 2011 Sep;84(1005):785-9
pubmed: 21081575
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):366-70
pubmed: 16126920
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1397-400
pubmed: 16221913
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Aug;33(8):1481-1489
pubmed: 28537441
Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):1097-102
pubmed: 16304121