Biocompatibility and efficacy of prostatic urethral lift in benign prostate hyperplasia: an in vivo and in vitro study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2023
24 08 2023
Historique:
received:
15
03
2023
accepted:
17
08
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
25
8
2023
entrez:
24
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study aimed to assess the biocompatibility and efficacy of a prostatic urethral lift (PUL) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Human BPH-1 cells were co-cultured with implant anchors and sutures, and cytotoxicity was measured. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe adhesion and growth of cells and to evaluate implant biocompatibility. Fifteen male beagle dogs were randomly assigned to the surgical (n = 9) or sham-operated (n = 6) groups. The surgical group underwent cystotomy, and PUL was used to insert two implants in each lobe of the prostate to compress the enlarged prostate and dilate the urethra; the sham group underwent cystotomy without implant insertion. Compared with the control group, no significant difference in cell viability among the groups with different co-culture times of implant anchors and sutures (P > 0.05) was observed. SEM revealed good adhesion and growth of prostate cells on the implants. Improvements in urine flow rates remained stable at 7, 28, and 180 days after surgery, and the urethral diameter in the prostate region was significantly increased compared with that before surgery. PUL is a biocompatible and effective treatment for BPH, improving the urine flow rate without causing inflammation, tissue damage, or cytotoxic effects. Here, the basis for further PUL application was provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37620451
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40889-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-40889-w
pmc: PMC10449769
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13828Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 9:S3-S14
pubmed: 16985902
Can J Urol. 2017 Jun;24(3):8802-8813
pubmed: 28646935
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Apr;45(4):415-424
pubmed: 35043243
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 11;7(1):7984
pubmed: 28801563
BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118 Suppl 3:14-22
pubmed: 27684483
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 23;13(15):
pubmed: 32717837
BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):767-775
pubmed: 27862831
Pol J Vet Sci. 2013;16(4):797-801
pubmed: 24597320
BJU Int. 2011 Jul;108(1):82-8
pubmed: 21554526
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Sep;22(3):411-419
pubmed: 30542055
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;12(24):
pubmed: 36558332
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Dec 01;93:1073-1089
pubmed: 30274039
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2161-7
pubmed: 23764081
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 May 07;14:3297-3309
pubmed: 31190794
Can J Urol. 2015 Oct;22 Suppl 1:1-6
pubmed: 26497338
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1353-1360
pubmed: 30283994
World J Mens Health. 2020 Jul;38(3):338-344
pubmed: 31385478
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 9;10(1):14834
pubmed: 32908208
BJU Int. 2020 Sep;126(3):317-326
pubmed: 32599656
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Mar;25(1):79-85
pubmed: 34363010
J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):279-87
pubmed: 24119101
Bioact Mater. 2022 Mar 16;16:15-26
pubmed: 35386333
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):508-19
pubmed: 24656222