Selecting the Vertebra above Sagittal Stable Vertebra as the Distal Fusion Level in Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Prospective Study with a Minimum of 2-Year Follow-Up.
Distal Fusion Level
Distal Junctional Kyphosis
Prospective Study
Sagittal Stable Vertebra
Scheuermann's Kyphosis
Journal
Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
revised:
27
06
2023
received:
27
03
2023
accepted:
30
06
2023
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
25
8
2023
entrez:
24
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The proper selection of the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) remains controversial in the surgical treatment of Scheuermann's disease and there is a paucity of studies investigating the clinical outcomes of fusion surgery when selecting the vertebra one level proximal to the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV-1) as LIV. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether SSV-1 could be a valid LIV for Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) patients with different curve patterns. This was a prospective study on consecutive SK patients treated with posterior surgery between January 2018 and September 2020, in which the distal fusion level ended at SSV-1. The LIV was selected at SSV-1 only in patients with Risser >2 and with LIV translation less than 40 mm. All of the patients had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were further grouped based on the sagittal curve pattern as thoracic kyphosis (TK, n = 23) and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK, n = 13). Radiographic parameters including global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), LIV translation, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were performed to evaluate clinical outcomes. A total of 36 patients were recruited in this study, with 23 in the TK group and 13 in the TLK group. In TK group, the GK was significantly decreased from 80.8° ± 10.1° to 45.4° ± 7.7° after surgery, and was maintained at 45.3° ± 8.6° at the final follow-up. While in the TLK group, GK was significantly decreased from 70.7° ± 9.2° to 39.1° ± 5.4° after surgery (p < 0.001) and to 39.3° ± 4.5° at the final follow-up. Meanwhile, despite presenting with different sagittal alignment, significant improvement was observed in LL, SVA, and LIV translation for both TK and TLK groups (p < 0.05). Self-reported scores of pain and self-image in TK group and scores of self-image and function in TLK group showed significant improvement at the final follow-up (all p < 0.05). Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) was observed in two patients (8.7%) in TK group, and one patient (7.7%) in TLK group. No revision surgery was performed. Selecting SSV-1 as LIV can achieve satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes for SK patients with different curve patterns without increasing the risk of DJK. This selection strategy could be a favorable option for SK patients with Risser sign >2 and LIV translation less than 40 mm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37620983
doi: 10.1111/os.13854
pmc: PMC10549797
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2638-2646Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 82072518
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jul;31(7):1710-1718
pubmed: 35039966
Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):296-302
pubmed: 18640879
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan;103-B(1):148-156
pubmed: 33380189
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):765-70
pubmed: 19365243
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Jan;52(1):7-11
pubmed: 29290534
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 15;45(18):1269-1276
pubmed: 32371681
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jul;23(7):1420-6
pubmed: 24639080
Global Spine J. 2012 Jun;2(2):65-70
pubmed: 24353949
Global Spine J. 2017 May;7(3):254-259
pubmed: 28660108
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):E729-34
pubmed: 19752692
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 May 15;27(10):e462-e472
pubmed: 30407981
EFORT Open Rev. 2022 Dec 07;7(11):782-791
pubmed: 36475554
Spine J. 2019 Sep;19(9):1529-1539
pubmed: 30986575
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Oct 23;2021:2142964
pubmed: 34725561
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 1;32(2):235-247
pubmed: 31675699
Joint Bone Spine. 2014 May;81(3):209-14
pubmed: 24468666
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Dec;20(8):586-93
pubmed: 18046172
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Oct;32(8):330-336
pubmed: 30762837
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jul 1;43(13):E758-E765
pubmed: 29189571
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Apr 1;47(7):E290-E295
pubmed: 34593730
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 1;38(19):1690-4
pubmed: 24509552
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):583-9
pubmed: 26195078
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2015 Jan-Mar;57(1):29-36
pubmed: 26431092
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):2091-2099
pubmed: 32424637