The Effects of a Biomimetic Hybrid Meso- and Nano-Scale Surface Topography on Blood and Protein Recruitment in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Implant Model.

bone-implant integration computational fluid dynamics (CFD) osseointegration titanium implant zirconia implant

Journal

Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2313-7673
Titre abrégé: Biomimetics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101719189

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 30 05 2023
revised: 04 08 2023
accepted: 11 08 2023
medline: 25 8 2023
pubmed: 25 8 2023
entrez: 25 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The mechanisms underlying bone-implant integration, or osseointegration, are still incompletely understood, in particular how blood and proteins are recruited to implant surfaces. The objective of this study was to visualize and quantify the flow of blood and the model protein fibrinogen using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) implant model. Implants with screws were designed with three different surface topographies: (1) amorphous, (2) nano-trabecular, and (3) hybrid meso-spikes and nano-trabeculae. The implant with nano-topography recruited more blood and fibrinogen to the implant interface than the amorphous implant. Implants with hybrid topography further increased recruitment, with particularly efficient recruitment from the thread area to the interface. Blood movement significantly slowed at the implant interface compared with the thread area for all implants. The blood velocity at the interface was 3- and 4-fold lower for the hybrid topography compared with the nano-topography and amorphous surfaces, respectively. Thus, this study for the first time provides insights into how different implant surfaces regulate blood dynamics and the potential advantages of surface texturization in blood and protein recruitment and retention. In particular, co-texturization with a hybrid meso- and nano-topography created the most favorable microenvironment. The established CFD model is simple, low-cost, and expected to be useful for a wide range of studies designing and optimizing implants at the macro and micro levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37622981
pii: biomimetics8040376
doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8040376
pmc: PMC10452410
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Nantoh Inc.
ID : 2023

Références

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Nov;84(5):522-34
pubmed: 11105008
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 17;22(22):
pubmed: 34830275
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jul;10(7):2907-18
pubmed: 24709541
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Feb;19(2):173-81
pubmed: 18184341
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Oct;80(4):439-49
pubmed: 9791791
Acta Biomater. 2019 Aug;94:112-131
pubmed: 31128320
Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:1327-41
pubmed: 21760728
J Prosthodont Res. 2023 Apr 12;67(2):288-299
pubmed: 35858802
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Mar-Apr;13(2):163-74
pubmed: 9581401
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):536-43
pubmed: 15543910
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 25;21(3):
pubmed: 31991761
J Dent Res. 2006 Jun;85(6):566-70
pubmed: 16723657
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 23;14(19):
pubmed: 34639891
Cells. 2022 Dec 21;12(1):
pubmed: 36611812
Bone. 2002 Jan;30(1):137-43
pubmed: 11792576
Dent Mater. 2010 Apr;26(4):275-87
pubmed: 20006380
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2011 Sep 05;3:59-67
pubmed: 23674916
Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):e157-67
pubmed: 25981907
Tissue Eng Part A. 2009 Dec;15(12):3679-88
pubmed: 19397472
Acta Biomater. 2011 Dec;7(12):4267-77
pubmed: 21888994
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Sep;24(9):991-1001
pubmed: 22726210
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 24;22(13):
pubmed: 34202795
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 19;21(2):
pubmed: 31963895
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 20;12(3):
pubmed: 36769501
J Dent Res. 2006 Jun;85(6):560-5
pubmed: 16723656
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jul;10(7):2894-906
pubmed: 24590162
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):753-61
pubmed: 22848875
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Jun 1;77(3):478-86
pubmed: 16482547
Acta Biomater. 2010 Dec;6(12):4578-88
pubmed: 20633705
Biomaterials. 2011 Nov;32(33):8374-84
pubmed: 21840046
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005 Mar 1;72(3):296-305
pubmed: 15654712
Biomaterials. 2006 Feb;27(6):926-36
pubmed: 16112191
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021 Dec 3;581:53-59
pubmed: 34655976
Biomaterials. 2010 Jun;31(18):4818-28
pubmed: 20350765
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Jan;84(1):108-16
pubmed: 17600332
J Dent Res. 2007 Feb;86(2):147-52
pubmed: 17251514
Biomaterials. 2011 Jul;32(19):4358-68
pubmed: 21421270
Acta Biomater. 2011 Oct;7(10):3679-91
pubmed: 21723964
J Dent Res. 2005 Jun;84(6):515-20
pubmed: 15914587
Biomaterials. 2009 Oct;30(29):5319-29
pubmed: 19589591
J Prosthodont. 2002 Dec;11(4):241-7
pubmed: 12501137
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):719-28
pubmed: 17974105
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3331-3345
pubmed: 37069409
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):63-74
pubmed: 20209188
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Dec 22;:
pubmed: 36543189
J Biomater Appl. 2015 May;29(10):1372-84
pubmed: 25604095
Biomaterials. 2011 Oct;32(30):7297-308
pubmed: 21742375
Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:2191-203
pubmed: 22114483
Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:859-73
pubmed: 22359461
J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2005 Jul;5(7):1081-7
pubmed: 16108431
Int J Nanomedicine. 2018 Jun 08;13:3381-3395
pubmed: 29922058
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Mar-Apr;18(2):200-10
pubmed: 12705297
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018 Apr;106(4):1034-1038
pubmed: 29218785
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):79-89
pubmed: 24396842
Acta Biomater. 2009 Oct;5(8):3247-57
pubmed: 19427421
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 May;98:1294-1305
pubmed: 30813009
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 26;22(15):
pubmed: 34360734
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 18;20(16):
pubmed: 31426563
J Dent Res. 2000 Nov;79(11):1857-63
pubmed: 11145355
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Oct;102(10):3618-30
pubmed: 24248891
J Biomater Appl. 2014 Apr;28(8):1200-12
pubmed: 23985537
Cells. 2022 Jul 10;11(14):
pubmed: 35883601
Biomaterials. 2009 Feb;30(6):1015-25
pubmed: 19042016
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):133-140
pubmed: 36190150
J Funct Biomater. 2023 May 26;14(6):
pubmed: 37367261
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):e95-102
pubmed: 24451893
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Apr;30(2):129-37
pubmed: 20228972

Auteurs

Hiroaki Kitajima (H)

Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Division of Regenerative and Reconstructive Sciences, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.

Makoto Hirota (M)

Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Division of Regenerative and Reconstructive Sciences, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Orthodontics, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.

Kohei Osawa (K)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.

Toshinori Iwai (T)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.

Kenji Mitsudo (K)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.

Juri Saruta (J)

Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Department of Education Planning, School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan.

Takahiro Ogawa (T)

Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Division of Regenerative and Reconstructive Sciences, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.

Classifications MeSH