Mean Heart Dose Prediction Using Parameters of Single-Slice Computed Tomography and Body Mass Index: Machine Learning Approach for Radiotherapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer of Asian Patients.
breast cancer
computed tomography
deep inspiration breath-hold technique
deep neural network
heart dose
machine learning
radiotherapy
Journal
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
ISSN: 1718-7729
Titre abrégé: Curr Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9502503
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 08 2023
04 08 2023
Historique:
received:
31
05
2023
revised:
08
07
2023
accepted:
30
07
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
25
8
2023
entrez:
25
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is an excellent technique to reduce the incidental radiation received by the heart during radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. However, DIBH is costly and time-consuming for patients and radiotherapy staff. In Asian countries, the use of DIBH is restricted due to the limited number of patients with a high mean heart dose (MHD) and the shortage of radiotherapy personnel and equipment compared to that in the USA. This study aimed to develop, evaluate, and compare the performance of ten machine learning algorithms for predicting MHD using a patient's body mass index and single-slice CT parameters to identify patients who may not require DIBH. Machine learning models were built and tested using a dataset containing 207 patients with left-sided breast cancer who were treated with field-in-field radiotherapy with free breathing. The average MHD was 251 cGy. Stratified repeated four-fold cross-validation was used to build models using 165 training data. The models were compared internally using their average performance metrics: F2 score, AUC, recall, accuracy, Cohen's kappa, and Matthews correlation coefficient. The final performance evaluation for each model was further externally analyzed using 42 unseen test data. The performance of each model was evaluated as a binary classifier by setting the cut-off value of MHD ≥ 300 cGy. The deep neural network (DNN) achieved the highest F2 score (78.9%). Most models successfully classified all patients with high MHD as true positive. This study indicates that the ten models, especially the DNN, might have the potential to identify patients who may not require DIBH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37623018
pii: curroncol30080537
doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080537
pmc: PMC10453557
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7412-7424Références
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(5):e178-e184
pubmed: 32418338
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1707-16
pubmed: 22019144
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 01;48(5):476-479
pubmed: 29635375
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 20;35(15):1641-1649
pubmed: 28319436
Radiol Oncol. 2021 Jan 29;55(2):212-220
pubmed: 33600676
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jun;23(6):e13609
pubmed: 35460150
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 8;8(6):e17364
pubmed: 32510459
SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):160
pubmed: 33778771
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jan 1;34(1):235-42
pubmed: 12118557
Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):3449-3459
pubmed: 29763967
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Oct;18(5):e819-e824
pubmed: 29980429
Front Oncol. 2018 Nov 27;8:564
pubmed: 30538954
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Aug 17;16(1):154
pubmed: 34404441
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jul-Aug;25(4):656-666
pubmed: 32617080
Acta Med Okayama. 2021 Jun;75(3):307-314
pubmed: 34176934
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 12;12(1):13706
pubmed: 35961992
Mol Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep;15(3):193
pubmed: 34349992
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Dec 1;93(5):1127-35
pubmed: 26581149
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0179805
pubmed: 28738059
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 13;19:39-45
pubmed: 31485490
Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106
pubmed: 16360786
J Radiat Res. 2020 May 22;61(3):447-456
pubmed: 32100831
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:845037
pubmed: 35530354
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb 19;17(1):35
pubmed: 35183194
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jan;24(1):52-62
pubmed: 27025498
Case Rep Oncol. 2017 Jan 16;10(1):37-51
pubmed: 28203163
J Radiat Res. 2021 Aug 31;:
pubmed: 34467396
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;56(9):826-32
pubmed: 14505766
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):281
pubmed: 31864346