Prospects and Aspirations for Workforce Training and Education in Social Prescribing.
contingent valuation
link workers
skills
social prescribing
training
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 08 2023
09 08 2023
Historique:
received:
10
05
2023
revised:
19
07
2023
accepted:
03
08
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
25
8
2023
entrez:
25
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A social prescribing (SP) link worker (LW) is responsible for enabling and supporting individuals, by assessing their personal goals and co-producing solutions to make use of appropriate local non-clinical resources or interventions. As an emerging new role, LWs are not regulated by professional bodies associated with SP. Therefore, currently there is no standardised training for LWs who are from varied backgrounds. As such, LWs have varying knowledge about how to deal with individuals with complex needs, which can impact on their decision-making capabilities to seek solutions and navigate complex systems. The purpose of the research was to explore LWs' level of education, past and current training requirements as well as elicit how much LWs were willing to pay (WTP) to access and undertake training to improve their skill set. A rigorous mixed method research design was employed which included semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and quantitative questionnaires including contingent valuation (CV) questions to a population of LWs across Wales from March to June 2020. Qualitative interviews with key stakeholders who commission and deliver social prescribing interventions employing LWs identified perceived link worker qualities and requirements for LW roles. Purposive sampling was used to identify and select individuals that have experience in managing LWs. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, interviews were carried out exclusively online. LWs self-selected to complete the online questionnaires. Questionnaires gathered data on LW qualifications and demographic information with the CV questions gathering data on the value LW placed on accessing training in SP. Thematic narrative analysis was applied to interpret the data from the semi-structured interviews. Descriptive frequency analysis was conducted on the quantitative data generated from the online questionnaire. SP coordinators ( The semi-structured interviews conducted with the key SP stakeholders yielded rich information and novel insight into LW training. External funding for the salary of the LW is an obstacle for LW development through training. In addition, the questionnaire results regarding stated preference techniques demonstrate that LWs place value on their professional development and would be willing to spend their own money on training to improve their knowledge and skills.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A social prescribing (SP) link worker (LW) is responsible for enabling and supporting individuals, by assessing their personal goals and co-producing solutions to make use of appropriate local non-clinical resources or interventions. As an emerging new role, LWs are not regulated by professional bodies associated with SP. Therefore, currently there is no standardised training for LWs who are from varied backgrounds. As such, LWs have varying knowledge about how to deal with individuals with complex needs, which can impact on their decision-making capabilities to seek solutions and navigate complex systems. The purpose of the research was to explore LWs' level of education, past and current training requirements as well as elicit how much LWs were willing to pay (WTP) to access and undertake training to improve their skill set.
METHODS
A rigorous mixed method research design was employed which included semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and quantitative questionnaires including contingent valuation (CV) questions to a population of LWs across Wales from March to June 2020. Qualitative interviews with key stakeholders who commission and deliver social prescribing interventions employing LWs identified perceived link worker qualities and requirements for LW roles. Purposive sampling was used to identify and select individuals that have experience in managing LWs. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, interviews were carried out exclusively online. LWs self-selected to complete the online questionnaires. Questionnaires gathered data on LW qualifications and demographic information with the CV questions gathering data on the value LW placed on accessing training in SP. Thematic narrative analysis was applied to interpret the data from the semi-structured interviews. Descriptive frequency analysis was conducted on the quantitative data generated from the online questionnaire.
FINDINGS
SP coordinators (
INTERPRETATION
The semi-structured interviews conducted with the key SP stakeholders yielded rich information and novel insight into LW training. External funding for the salary of the LW is an obstacle for LW development through training. In addition, the questionnaire results regarding stated preference techniques demonstrate that LWs place value on their professional development and would be willing to spend their own money on training to improve their knowledge and skills.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37623135
pii: ijerph20166549
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166549
pmc: PMC10454513
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):3
pubmed: 36741971
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Nov;29(6):1844-1851
pubmed: 33528060
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 22;19(1):98
pubmed: 30670001
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Sep;5(4):87-8
pubmed: 25316987
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;18(6):743-760
pubmed: 27623946
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 12;20(12):
pubmed: 37372698
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 1;11(2):e041809
pubmed: 33526499
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):848-868
pubmed: 35404485
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 2003;8:iii-xi, 1-116
pubmed: 15027158
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1535-1543
pubmed: 32166862
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e675-e681
pubmed: 31501166
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):49
pubmed: 32164681