Half-Dose versus Single-Dose Gadobutrol for Extracellular Volume Measurements in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.
CMR
ECV
T1 mapping
cardiac
gadobutrol
gadolinium
renal insufficiency
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular development and disease
ISSN: 2308-3425
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101651414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jul 2023
26 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
17
05
2023
revised:
19
07
2023
accepted:
24
07
2023
medline:
25
8
2023
pubmed:
25
8
2023
entrez:
25
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents offers unique non-invasive insights into cardiac tissue composition. Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) has evolved as an objective and robust parameter with broad diagnostic and prognostic implications. For the gadolinium compound gadobutrol, the recommended dose for cardiac imaging, including ECV measurements, is 0.1 mmol/kg (single dose). This dose was optimized for late enhancement imaging, a measure of focal fibrosis. Whether a lower dose is sufficient for ECV measurements is unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of ECV measurements using a half dose of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobutrol compared to the standard single dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. From a contemporary trial (NCT04747366, registered 10 February 2021), a total of 25 examinations with available T1 mapping before and after 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol were analyzed. ECV values were calculated automatically from pre- and post-contrast T1 relaxation times. T1 and ECV Measurements were performed in the midventricular septum. ECV values after 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol were correlated (R CMR with a half dose of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobutrol overestimated ECV by 0.9% compared with a full dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, necessitating adjustment of normal values when using half-dose ECV imaging.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents offers unique non-invasive insights into cardiac tissue composition. Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) has evolved as an objective and robust parameter with broad diagnostic and prognostic implications. For the gadolinium compound gadobutrol, the recommended dose for cardiac imaging, including ECV measurements, is 0.1 mmol/kg (single dose). This dose was optimized for late enhancement imaging, a measure of focal fibrosis. Whether a lower dose is sufficient for ECV measurements is unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of ECV measurements using a half dose of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobutrol compared to the standard single dose of 0.1 mmol/kg.
METHODS AND RESULTS
RESULTS
From a contemporary trial (NCT04747366, registered 10 February 2021), a total of 25 examinations with available T1 mapping before and after 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol were analyzed. ECV values were calculated automatically from pre- and post-contrast T1 relaxation times. T1 and ECV Measurements were performed in the midventricular septum. ECV values after 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol were correlated (R
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
CMR with a half dose of 0.05 mmol/kg gadobutrol overestimated ECV by 0.9% compared with a full dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, necessitating adjustment of normal values when using half-dose ECV imaging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37623329
pii: jcdd10080316
doi: 10.3390/jcdd10080316
pmc: PMC10455162
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Federal Ministry of Education and Research
ID : FKZ 01KX2021
Références
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75
pubmed: 28992817
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Dec 18;4(12):
pubmed: 26683218
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):28-35
pubmed: 33170103
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Apr;15(4):e013745
pubmed: 35360924
Circulation. 2012 Sep 4;126(10):1206-16
pubmed: 22851543
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Aug 8;20(1):55
pubmed: 30086783
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jan 31;17(1):6
pubmed: 25638228
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 May 01;14:27
pubmed: 22548832
Acta Radiol. 2017 Jul;58(7):809-815
pubmed: 27794025
Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:273-91
pubmed: 26768242
Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(10):1268-78
pubmed: 22279111
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 May;15(5):556-65
pubmed: 24282220
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e020351
pubmed: 34423658
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jul;52(1):141-6
pubmed: 15236377
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Dec;3(6):e001353
pubmed: 25516438
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):223-230
pubmed: 31816007
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 05;8(11):
pubmed: 31694263
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May 1;6(3):373-83
pubmed: 23553570
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;37(8):849-870
pubmed: 35904671