Mechanical and Functional Improvement of β-TCP Scaffolds for Use in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Raman spectroscopy biomaterial jaw periosteal cells mechanical properties mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation polylactic acid scaffold β-tricalcium phosphate

Journal

Journal of functional biomaterials
ISSN: 2079-4983
Titre abrégé: J Funct Biomater
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101570734

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 19 06 2023
revised: 08 08 2023
accepted: 11 08 2023
medline: 25 8 2023
pubmed: 25 8 2023
entrez: 25 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Autologous bone transplantation is still considered as the gold standard therapeutic option for bone defect repair. The alternative tissue engineering approaches have to combine good hardiness of biomaterials whilst allowing good stem cell functionality. To become more useful for load-bearing applications, mechanical properties of calcium phosphate materials have to be improved. In the present study, we aimed to reduce the brittleness of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). For this purpose, we used three polymers (PDL-02, -02a, -04) for coatings and compared resulting mechanical and degradation properties as well as their impact on seeded periosteal stem cells. Mechanical properties of coated and uncoated β-TCP scaffolds were analyzed. In addition, degradation kinetics analyses of the polymers employed and of the polymer-coated scaffolds were performed. For bioactivity assessment, the scaffolds were seeded with jaw periosteal cells (JPCs) and cultured under untreated and osteogenic conditions. JPC adhesion/proliferation, gene and protein expression by immunofluorescent staining of embedded scaffolds were analyzed. Raman spectroscopy measurements gave an insight into material properties and cell mineralization. PDL-coated β-TCP scaffolds showed a significantly higher flexural strength in comparison to that of uncoated scaffolds. Degradation kinetics showed considerable differences in pH and electrical conductivity of the three different polymer types, while the core material β-TCP was able to stabilize pH and conductivity. Material differences seemed to have an impact on JPC proliferation and differentiation potential, as reflected by the expression of osteogenic marker genes. A homogenous cell colonialization of coated and uncoated scaffolds was detected. Most interesting from a bone engineer's point of view, the PDL-04 coating enabled detection of cell matrix mineralization by Raman spectroscopy. This was not feasible with uncoated scaffolds, due to intercalating effects of the β-TCP material and the JPC-formed calcium phosphate. In conclusion, the use of PDL-04 coating improved the mechanical properties of the β-TCP scaffold and promoted cell adhesion and osteogenic differentiation, whilst allowing detection of cell mineralization within the ceramic core material.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37623671
pii: jfb14080427
doi: 10.3390/jfb14080427
pmc: PMC10455746
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : AL 1486/6-1
Organisme : AiF
ID : KF2061702SB4/KF2662003SB4

Références

Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 5;12(1):18785
pubmed: 36335148
Acta Biomater. 2011 Jan;7(1):16-30
pubmed: 20655397
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jan 6;40(1):10
pubmed: 33407762
Molecules. 2021 Nov 22;26(22):
pubmed: 34834134
Tissue Eng Part A. 2014 Jul;20(13-14):1827-40
pubmed: 24447025
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 28;24(1):
pubmed: 36613972
Commun Biol. 2019 Apr 26;2:144
pubmed: 31044169
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Jan 1;82:163-181
pubmed: 29025644
Molecules. 2021 May 18;26(10):
pubmed: 34070157
Biomed Mater. 2015 Aug 04;10(4):045018
pubmed: 26238604
Biomaterials. 2006 Jun;27(18):3413-31
pubmed: 16504284
Bone. 2014 Aug;65:18-24
pubmed: 24803077
Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:1651376
pubmed: 28232849
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 27;20(17):
pubmed: 31461878
Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2023 May;29(5):197-215
pubmed: 37071160
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Aug 1;33(17):1843-9
pubmed: 18670337
Regen Biomater. 2023 Feb 17;10:rbad013
pubmed: 36915714
Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(8):1399-409
pubmed: 16169074
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 23;22(19):
pubmed: 34638571
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022 Oct;28(5):949-965
pubmed: 34579558
Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 1;83:435-455
pubmed: 30408560

Auteurs

Felix Umrath (F)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Lukas-Frank Schmitt (LF)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Sophie-Maria Kliesch (SM)

Quality Analysis GmbH, 72622 Nürtingen, Germany.

Christine Schille (C)

Section Medical Materials Science and Technology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer (J)

Section Medical Materials Science and Technology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Elina Gurewitsch (E)

Curasan AG, 65933 Frankfurt, Germany.

Kathleen Bahrini (K)

Curasan AG, 65933 Frankfurt, Germany.

Fabian Peters (F)

Curasan AG, 65933 Frankfurt, Germany.

Siegmar Reinert (S)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Dorothea Alexander (D)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH