Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.


Journal

Circulation
ISSN: 1524-4539
Titre abrégé: Circulation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0147763

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 09 2023
Historique:
medline: 27 9 2023
pubmed: 25 8 2023
entrez: 25 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha. A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1; Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.
METHODS
The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha.
RESULTS
A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1;
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.
REGISTRATION
URL: https://www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37624364
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065448
pmc: PMC10516164
doi:

Substances chimiques

zotarolimus H4GXR80IZE
Everolimus 9HW64Q8G6G
Polymers 0
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors 0
Sirolimus W36ZG6FT64

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04137510']

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

989-999

Investigateurs

Marco Valgimigli (M)
Adrian Wlodarczak (A)
Ralph Tölg (R)
Béla Merkely (B)
Marco Moccetti (M)
Henning Kelbæk (H)
Jacek Legutko (J)
Stefano Galli (S)
Matthieu Godin (M)
Gabor G Toth-Gayor (GG)
Thibault Lhermusier (T)
Benjamin Honton (B)
Francesca Sanguineti (F)
Peter Laurenz Dietrich (PL)
Francis Stammen (F)
Bert Ferdinande (B)
Johanne Silvain (J)
Davide Capodanno (D)
Ralf Birkemeyer (R)
Steffen Schneider (S)
Lutz Büllesfeld (L)
Bernhard Witzenbichler (B)
Matthias Hochadel (M)
Nicolas Collins (N)
Imran Shiekh (I)
William Van Gaal (W)
Mathias-Christoph Brandt (MC)
Joëlle Kefer (J)
Patrick Coussement (P)
Niels Thue Olsen (NT)
Guillaume Cayla (G)
Etienne Puymirat (E)
Gilles Lemesle (G)
Didier Romain (D)
Michael Haude (M)
Thomas Schmitz (T)
Mohammad Sherif (M)
Jochen Wöhrle (J)
See Yue Arthur Yung (SY)
Bryan Yan (B)
András Vorobcsuk (A)
Ivan Horvath (I)
Marco Ferlini (M)
Elisa Nicolini (E)
Andrejs Erglis (A)
Artis Kalnins (A)
Shaiful Azmi (S)
Samer Somi (S)
Jithendra Somaratne (J)
Deanna Khoo Zhi Lin (DK)
Jose Maria de la Torre Hernandez (JM)
Alfonso Torres Bosco (AT)
Juan Sanchis Fores (JS)
Stéphane Fournier (S)
Juan Iglesias (J)
Vladimir Rubimbura (V)
Wirash Kehasukcharoen (W)

Auteurs

Marco Valgimigli (M)

Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (M.V.).

Adrian Wlodarczak (A)

Poland Miedziowe Centrum Zdrowia Lubin, Poland (A.W.).

Ralph Tölg (R)

Herzzentrum der Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad Segeberg, Germany (R.T.).

Béla Merkely (B)

Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (B.M.).

Henning Kelbæk (H)

Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark (H.K.).

Jacek Legutko (J)

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland (J.L.).

Stefano Galli (S)

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy (S.G.).

Matthieu Godin (M)

Department of Cardiology, Clinique Saint Hilaire, Rouen, France (M.G.).

Gabor G Toth (GG)

University Heart Center Graz, Department of Cardiology, Medical University Graz, Austria (G.G.T.).

Thibault Lhermusier (T)

Hôpital de Rangueil, Fédération de Cardiologie, Pôle Cardio-vasculaire et Métabolique, Toulouse, France (T.L.).

Benjamin Honton (B)

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France (B.H.).

Peter Laurenz Dietrich (PL)

Division of Cardiology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland (P.L.D.).

Francis Stammen (F)

Department of Cardiology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium (F.S.).

Bert Ferdinande (B)

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Oost-Limburg Genk, Belgium (B.F.).

Johanne Silvain (J)

Sorbonne Université, ACTION Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (AP-HP), Institut de Cardiologie, Paris, France (J.S.).

Davide Capodanno (D)

Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco," University of Catania, Italy (D.C.).

Guillaume Cayla (G)

Cardiology Department, Nîmes University Hospital, Montpellier University, Nîmes, France (G.C.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH