Role of cosyntropin in the management of postpartum post-dural puncture headache: a two-center retrospective cohort study.


Journal

International journal of obstetric anesthesia
ISSN: 1532-3374
Titre abrégé: Int J Obstet Anesth
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9200430

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
received: 28 10 2022
revised: 31 03 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 30 10 2023
pubmed: 26 8 2023
entrez: 25 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research suggests that postpartum post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) might be prevented or treated by administering intravenous cosyntropin. In this retrospective cohort study, we questioned whether prophylactic (1 mg) and therapeutic (7 µg/kg) intravenous cosyntropin following unintentional dural puncture (UDP) was effective in decreasing the incidence of PDPH and therapeutic epidural blood patch (EBP) after birth. Two tertiary-care American university hospitals collected data from November 1999 to May 2017. Two hundred and fifty-three postpartum patients who experienced an UDP were analyzed. In one institution 32 patients were exposed to and 32 patients were not given prophylactic cosyntropin; in the other institution, once PDPH developed, 36 patients were given and 153 patients were not given therapeutic cosyntropin. The primary outcome for the prophylactic cosyntropin analysis was the incidence of PDPH and for the therapeutic cosyntropin analysis in exposed vs. unexposed patients, the receipt of an EBP. The secondary outcome for the prophylactic cosyntropin groups was the receipt of an EBP. In the prophylactic cosyntropin analysis no significant difference was found in the risk of PDPH between those exposed to cosyntropin (19/32, 59%) and unexposed patients (17/32, 53%; odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.98, P = 0.56), or in the incidence of EBP between exposed (12/32, 38%) and unexposed patients (6/32, 19%; OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.83 to 8.13, P = 0.095). In the therapeutic cosyntropin analysis, in patients exposed to cosyntropin the incidence of EBP was significantly higher (20/36, 56% vs. 43/153, 28%; OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.52 to 6.74, P = 0.002). Our data show no benefits from the use of cosyntropin for preventing or treating postpartum PDPH.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Research suggests that postpartum post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) might be prevented or treated by administering intravenous cosyntropin.
METHODS
In this retrospective cohort study, we questioned whether prophylactic (1 mg) and therapeutic (7 µg/kg) intravenous cosyntropin following unintentional dural puncture (UDP) was effective in decreasing the incidence of PDPH and therapeutic epidural blood patch (EBP) after birth. Two tertiary-care American university hospitals collected data from November 1999 to May 2017. Two hundred and fifty-three postpartum patients who experienced an UDP were analyzed. In one institution 32 patients were exposed to and 32 patients were not given prophylactic cosyntropin; in the other institution, once PDPH developed, 36 patients were given and 153 patients were not given therapeutic cosyntropin. The primary outcome for the prophylactic cosyntropin analysis was the incidence of PDPH and for the therapeutic cosyntropin analysis in exposed vs. unexposed patients, the receipt of an EBP. The secondary outcome for the prophylactic cosyntropin groups was the receipt of an EBP.
RESULTS
In the prophylactic cosyntropin analysis no significant difference was found in the risk of PDPH between those exposed to cosyntropin (19/32, 59%) and unexposed patients (17/32, 53%; odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.98, P = 0.56), or in the incidence of EBP between exposed (12/32, 38%) and unexposed patients (6/32, 19%; OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.83 to 8.13, P = 0.095). In the therapeutic cosyntropin analysis, in patients exposed to cosyntropin the incidence of EBP was significantly higher (20/36, 56% vs. 43/153, 28%; OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.52 to 6.74, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
Our data show no benefits from the use of cosyntropin for preventing or treating postpartum PDPH.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37625985
pii: S0959-289X(23)00271-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103917
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cosyntropin 16960-16-0
Uridine Diphosphate 58-98-0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103917

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

C Pancaro (C)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA. Electronic address: cpancaro@med.umich.edu.

K Balonov (K)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

K Herbert (K)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

N Shah (N)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

S Segal (S)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

R Cassidy (R)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

M C Engoren (MC)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

V Manica (V)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

A S Habib (AS)

Departments of Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan, Tufts, Duke University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Medical University of South Carolina, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH