Effect of Siponimod on Brain and Spinal Cord Imaging Markers of Neurodegeneration in the Theiler's Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus Model of Demyelination.
MRI
TMEV
brain atrophy
siponimod
spinal cord
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2023
20 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
29
06
2023
revised:
05
08
2023
accepted:
14
08
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
26
8
2023
entrez:
26
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Siponimod (Sp) is a Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator, and it suppresses S1P- mediated autoimmune lymphocyte transport and inflammation. Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) infection mouse model of multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibits inflammation-driven acute and chronic phases, spinal cord lesions, brain and spinal cord atrophy, and white matter injury. The objective of the study was to investigate whether Sp treatment could attenuate inflammation-induced pathology in the TMEV model by inhibiting microglial activation and preventing the atrophy of central nervous tissue associated with neurodegeneration. Clinical disability score (CDS), body weight (BW), and rotarod retention time measures were used to assess Sp's impact on neurodegeneration and disease progression in 4 study groups of 102 animals, including 44 Sp-treated (SpT), 44 vehicle-treated, 6 saline-injected, and 8 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Next, 58 (22 SpT, 22 vehicle, 6 saline injected, and 8 HC) out of the 102 animals were further evaluated to assess the effect of Sp on brain region-specific and spinal cord volume changes, as well as microglial activation. Sp increased CDS and decreased BW and rotarod retention time in TMEV mice, but did not significantly affect most brain region volumes, except for lateral ventricle volume. Sp suppressed ventricular enlargement, suggesting reduced TMEV-induced inflammation in LV. No significant differences in spine volume changes were observed between Sp- and vehicle-treated animals, but there were differences between HC and TMEV groups, indicating TMEV-induced inflammation contributed to increased spine volume. Spine histology revealed no significant microglial density differences between groups in gray matter, but HC animals had higher type 1 morphology and lower type 2 morphology percentages in gray and white matter regions. This suggests that Sp did not significantly affect microglial density but may have modulated neuroinflammation in the spinal cord. Sp may have some effects on neuroinflammation and ventricular enlargement. However, it did not demonstrate a significant impact on neurodegeneration, spinal volume, or lesion volume in the TMEV mouse model. Further investigation is required to fully understand Sp's effect on microglial activation and its relevance to the pathophysiology of MS. The differences between the current study and previous research using other MS models, such as EAE, highlight the differences in pathological processes in these two disease models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37629171
pii: ijms241612990
doi: 10.3390/ijms241612990
pmc: PMC10455446
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
siponimod
RR6P8L282I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Novartis (Netherlands)
ID : Research reported in this publication was funded by Novartis Pharma AG. The research was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number UL1TR001412. The content is sole
Références
Exp Neurol. 2021 Jan;335:113488
pubmed: 32991933
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;5(3):355-69
pubmed: 19894121
J Neurovirol. 2014 Apr;20(2):107-12
pubmed: 23857332
NMR Biomed. 2023 Apr 30;:e4964
pubmed: 37122101
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;167(5):1035-47
pubmed: 22646698
Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998 Jun 1;57(1):1-9
pubmed: 9630473
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2018 Jul 17;11:1756286418788013
pubmed: 30038666
Pathophysiology. 2011 Feb;18(1):21-9
pubmed: 20537877
Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1263-1273
pubmed: 29576505
J Neuroimaging. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):595-9
pubmed: 25893491
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182729
pubmed: 28796815
J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Aug 26;13(1):207
pubmed: 27566665
FEBS Lett. 1997 Nov 17;417(3):279-82
pubmed: 9409733
J Neuroimaging. 2019 Jan;29(1):52-61
pubmed: 30232810
Immunology. 1992 Apr;75(4):652-8
pubmed: 1350571
J Neuroimaging. 2020 Nov;30(6):769-778
pubmed: 32866329
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Jan;17(1):174-207
pubmed: 14726460
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):183-93
pubmed: 25772897
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020 Sep;19(9):1121-1142
pubmed: 32744073
Exp Neurol. 2019 Apr;314:82-90
pubmed: 30684521
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
pubmed: 15501092
J Neurosci Res. 1999 Nov 15;58(4):492-504
pubmed: 10533042
Acta Med Okayama. 2005 Aug;59(4):121-7
pubmed: 16155637
J Neurol. 2023 Aug;270(8):3758-3769
pubmed: 37067590
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):802-6
pubmed: 20817104
Glia. 2010 Sep;58(12):1465-76
pubmed: 20648639
J Immunol. 1984 Apr;132(4):1821-5
pubmed: 6699403