Coronary Flow Capacity And Survival Prediction After Revascularization: Physiological Basis And Clinical Implications.
Coronary artery disease
PET imaging
coronary bypass surgery
coronary flow reserve
myocardial ischemia
myocardial perfusion
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2023
27 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
09
07
2023
revised:
20
08
2023
accepted:
21
08
2023
medline:
27
8
2023
pubmed:
27
8
2023
entrez:
27
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Coronary Flow Capacity (CFC) associates with an Observed 10-yearsurvival probability for individual patients before and after actual revascularization for comparison to Virtual hypothetical ideal complete revascularization. Stress myocardial perfusion (mL/min/g) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) per pixel were quantified in 6979 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects using Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for CFC maps of artery-specific size-severity abnormalities expressed as percent left ventricle (%LV) with prospective follow-up to define survival probability per-decade as fraction of 1.0. Severely reduced CFC in 6979 subjects predicted low survival probability that improved by 42% after revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable severity (P=0.0015). For 283 pre-and-post-procedure PET pairs, severely reduced regional CFC-associated survival probability improved heterogeneously after revascularization (P<0.001), more so after bypass surgery than percutaneous coronary interventions (P<0.001) but normalized in only 5.7%; non-severe baseline CFC or survival probability did not improve compared with severe CFC (P=0.00001). Observed CFC=associated survival probability after actual revascularization was lower than Virtual ideal hypothetical complete post-revascularization survival probability due to residual CAD or failed revascularization (P<0.001) unrelated to gender or microvascular dysfunction. Severely reduced CFC in 2552 post-revascularization subjects associated with low survival probability also improved after repeat revascularization compared with no repeat procedures (P=0.025). Severely reduced CFC and associated Observed survival probability improved after first and repeat revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable CFC severity. Non-severe CFC showed no benefit. Discordance between Observed actual and Virtual hypothetical post=revascularization survival probability revealed residual CAD or failed revascularization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Coronary Flow Capacity (CFC) associates with an Observed 10-yearsurvival probability for individual patients before and after actual revascularization for comparison to Virtual hypothetical ideal complete revascularization.
METHODS
METHODS
Stress myocardial perfusion (mL/min/g) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) per pixel were quantified in 6979 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects using Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for CFC maps of artery-specific size-severity abnormalities expressed as percent left ventricle (%LV) with prospective follow-up to define survival probability per-decade as fraction of 1.0.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Severely reduced CFC in 6979 subjects predicted low survival probability that improved by 42% after revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable severity (P=0.0015). For 283 pre-and-post-procedure PET pairs, severely reduced regional CFC-associated survival probability improved heterogeneously after revascularization (P<0.001), more so after bypass surgery than percutaneous coronary interventions (P<0.001) but normalized in only 5.7%; non-severe baseline CFC or survival probability did not improve compared with severe CFC (P=0.00001). Observed CFC=associated survival probability after actual revascularization was lower than Virtual ideal hypothetical complete post-revascularization survival probability due to residual CAD or failed revascularization (P<0.001) unrelated to gender or microvascular dysfunction. Severely reduced CFC in 2552 post-revascularization subjects associated with low survival probability also improved after repeat revascularization compared with no repeat procedures (P=0.025).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Severely reduced CFC and associated Observed survival probability improved after first and repeat revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable CFC severity. Non-severe CFC showed no benefit. Discordance between Observed actual and Virtual hypothetical post=revascularization survival probability revealed residual CAD or failed revascularization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37634192
pii: 7251371
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad579
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.