Impact of an Electronic Medical Record-Connected Questionnaire on Efficient Nursing Documentation: Usability and Efficacy Study.

EHR EMR data capture data conversion documentation documenting electronic medical record electronic questionnaire health record health records information system information systems medical informatics medical records nursing nursing record nursing records nursing system patient data questionnaires self-reported usability

Journal

JMIR nursing
ISSN: 2562-7600
Titre abrégé: JMIR Nurs
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101771299

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 31 07 2023
accepted: 27 08 2023
revised: 26 08 2023
medline: 27 8 2023
pubmed: 27 8 2023
entrez: 27 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Documentation tasks comprise a large percentage of nurses' workloads. Nursing records were partially based on a report from the patient. However, it is not a verbatim transcription of the patient's complaints but a type of medical record. Therefore, to reduce the time spent on nursing documentation, it is necessary to assist in the appropriate conversion or citation of patient reports to professional records. However, few studies have been conducted on systems for capturing patient reports in electronic medical records. In addition, there have been no reports on whether such a system reduces the time spent on nursing documentation. This study aims to develop a patient self-reporting system that appropriately converts data to nursing records and evaluate its effect on reducing the documenting burden for nurses. An electronic medical record-connected questionnaire and a preadmission nursing questionnaire were administered. The questionnaire responses entered by the patients were quoted in the patient profile for inpatient assessment in the nursing system. To clarify its efficacy, this study examined whether the use of the electronic questionnaire system saved the nurses' time entering the patient profile admitted between August and December 2022. It also surveyed the usability of the electronic questionnaire between April and December 2022. A total of 3111 (78%) patients reported that they answered the electronic medical questionnaire by themselves. Of them, 2715 (88%) felt it was easy to use and 2604 (85%) were willing to use it again. The electronic questionnaire was used in 1326 of 2425 admission cases (use group). The input time for the patient profile was significantly shorter in the use group than in the no-use group (P<.001). Stratified analyses showed that in the internal medicine wards and in patients with dependent activities of daily living, nurses took 13%-18% (1.3 to 2 minutes) less time to enter patient profiles within the use group (both P<.001), even though there was no difference in the amount of information. By contrast, in the surgical wards and in the patients with independent activities of daily living, there was no difference in the time to entry (P=.50 and P=.20, respectively), but there was a greater amount of information in the use group. The study developed and implemented a system in which self-reported patient data were captured in the hospital information network and quoted in the nursing system. This system contributes to improving the efficiency of nurses' task recordings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Documentation tasks comprise a large percentage of nurses' workloads. Nursing records were partially based on a report from the patient. However, it is not a verbatim transcription of the patient's complaints but a type of medical record. Therefore, to reduce the time spent on nursing documentation, it is necessary to assist in the appropriate conversion or citation of patient reports to professional records. However, few studies have been conducted on systems for capturing patient reports in electronic medical records. In addition, there have been no reports on whether such a system reduces the time spent on nursing documentation.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to develop a patient self-reporting system that appropriately converts data to nursing records and evaluate its effect on reducing the documenting burden for nurses.
METHODS METHODS
An electronic medical record-connected questionnaire and a preadmission nursing questionnaire were administered. The questionnaire responses entered by the patients were quoted in the patient profile for inpatient assessment in the nursing system. To clarify its efficacy, this study examined whether the use of the electronic questionnaire system saved the nurses' time entering the patient profile admitted between August and December 2022. It also surveyed the usability of the electronic questionnaire between April and December 2022.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 3111 (78%) patients reported that they answered the electronic medical questionnaire by themselves. Of them, 2715 (88%) felt it was easy to use and 2604 (85%) were willing to use it again. The electronic questionnaire was used in 1326 of 2425 admission cases (use group). The input time for the patient profile was significantly shorter in the use group than in the no-use group (P<.001). Stratified analyses showed that in the internal medicine wards and in patients with dependent activities of daily living, nurses took 13%-18% (1.3 to 2 minutes) less time to enter patient profiles within the use group (both P<.001), even though there was no difference in the amount of information. By contrast, in the surgical wards and in the patients with independent activities of daily living, there was no difference in the time to entry (P=.50 and P=.20, respectively), but there was a greater amount of information in the use group.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The study developed and implemented a system in which self-reported patient data were captured in the hospital information network and quoted in the nursing system. This system contributes to improving the efficiency of nurses' task recordings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37634203
pii: v6i1e51303
doi: 10.2196/51303
pmc: PMC10562973
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e51303

Informations de copyright

©Kana Kodama, Shozo Konishi, Shirou Manabe, Katsuki Okada, Junji Yamaguchi, Shoya Wada, Kento Sugimoto, Sakiko Itoh, Daiyo Takahashi, Ryo Kawasaki, Yasushi Matsumura, Toshihiro Takeda. Originally published in JMIR Nursing (https://nursing.jmir.org), 25.09.2023.

Références

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):798-807
pubmed: 32159770
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Aug 4;40(2):90-94
pubmed: 34347642
Patient. 2018 Dec;11(6):591-598
pubmed: 29968179
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):168
pubmed: 33750305
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:638-42
pubmed: 27577462
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Sep 15;5(1):91
pubmed: 34524558
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 05;2018:1137-1146
pubmed: 30815156
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 9;22(1):63
pubmed: 36890555
JAMIA Open. 2022 Oct 12;5(4):ooac052
pubmed: 36247085
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jul - Aug;77(4):961-968
pubmed: 32171748
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 25;19(4):e122
pubmed: 28442454
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Oct;43:36-41
pubmed: 30220361
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;53(4):431-440
pubmed: 30221997
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):531-538
pubmed: 32016375
BMC Cancer. 2019 May 17;19(1):463
pubmed: 31101017
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:297-301
pubmed: 27577391
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Aug;9(4):479-484
pubmed: 28824762
JMIR Nurs. 2019 Nov 01;2(1):e15658
pubmed: 34345775
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):543
pubmed: 32522163
J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 5;31(1):1-11
pubmed: 33012777
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Oct;210:106364
pubmed: 34500143
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jan;6:e2100137
pubmed: 34985914

Auteurs

Kana Kodama (K)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Shozo Konishi (S)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Shirou Manabe (S)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Department of Transformative System for Medical Information, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Katsuki Okada (K)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Shoya Wada (S)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Department of Transformative System for Medical Information, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Kento Sugimoto (K)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Sakiko Itoh (S)

Department of Home Health and Palliative Care Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Ryo Kawasaki (R)

Division of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Yasushi Matsumura (Y)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Toshihiro Takeda (T)

Department of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Classifications MeSH