The estimand framework had implications in time to patient-reported outcomes deterioration analyses in cancer clinical trials.
Cancer research
Competing risks
Estimand framework
Intercurrent events
Patient-reported outcomes
Time to deterioration
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
ISSN: 1878-5921
Titre abrégé: J Clin Epidemiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8801383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
02
03
2023
revised:
02
08
2023
accepted:
21
08
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
entrez:
27
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To apply the estimand framework in time to deterioration (TTD) analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and identify the appropriate statistical methods to deal with intercurrent event (IEs) such as death. Data from phase II randomized trial were used. We estimated TTD using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 questionnaire with death as the IE, by applying Kaplan-Meier (K.M.) estimator and Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. The Fine-Gray approach was explored, accounting for death as a competing risk. The estimands targeted by the aforementioned methods were defined. We analyzed the data of 64 patients with available questionnaires at baseline. The most notable differences in TTD estimates were observed for deterioration in physical functioning: the hazard ratios were 0.44 [95% CI 0.22-0.90] and 0.62 [95% CI 0.36-1.07] by either ignoring death (31 events) or considering it as deterioration (58 events), respectively (Cox-PH model). When considering death as a competing event (Fine-Gray model), the sub-HRs was 0.51 [95% CI 0.26-1.01]. Depending on the proportion and distribution of deaths occurring before deterioration between arms, the Fine-Gray competing risks model should be considered rather than KM estimator and Cox PH model to reflect the patient's experience of the disease and treatment burden.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37634702
pii: S0895-4356(23)00215-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
118-126Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest AA received honorary from Astrazeneca, AMGEN, IPSEN, Kite/Gilead, and had a advisory role for Astrazeneca and Kite/Gilead, outside the submitted work. CL received honorary from MSD, Amgen, Roche, Servier, and travel expenses from Roche and MSD, outside the submitted work. JBB received honorary from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Viatris and has a advisory role for Amgen, Acobiom, BMS, GSK, Merck Serono, MSD, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Incyte, outside the submitted work. FE had a consultancy or advisory role for AbbVie, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, and Syros, outside the submitted work. Other authors have no conflict of interest.