Adaptation of Ocular Opponency Neurons Mediates Attention-Induced Ocular Dominance Plasticity.
Adaptation
Attention
Ocular dominance
Opponency neuron
Steady-state visually evoked potential
Journal
Neuroscience bulletin
ISSN: 1995-8218
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Bull
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101256850
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2023
27 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
13
03
2023
accepted:
01
06
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
entrez:
27
8
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Previous research has shown that ocular dominance can be biased by prolonged attention to one eye. The ocular-opponency-neuron model of binocular rivalry has been proposed as a candidate account for this phenomenon. Yet direct neural evidence is still lacking. By manipulating the contrast of dichoptic testing gratings, here we measured the steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) at the intermodulation frequencies to selectively track the activities of ocular-opponency-neurons before and after the "dichoptic-backward-movie" adaptation. One hour of adaptation caused a shift of perceptual and neural ocular dominance towards the unattended eye. More importantly, we found a decrease in the intermodulation SSVEP response after adaptation, which was significantly greater when high-contrast gratings were presented to the attended eye than when they were presented to the unattended eye. These results strongly support the view that the adaptation of ocular-opponency-neurons contributes to the ocular dominance plasticity induced by prolonged eye-based attention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37635196
doi: 10.1007/s12264-023-01103-z
pii: 10.1007/s12264-023-01103-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Références
Treisman AM. Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol Rev 1969, 76: 282–299.
pubmed: 4893203
doi: 10.1037/h0027242
Wolfe JM, Cave KR, Franzel SL. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989, 15: 419–433.
pubmed: 2527952
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Dobmeyer S, Shulman GL, Petersen SE. Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science 1990, 248: 1556–1559.
pubmed: 2360050
doi: 10.1126/science.2360050
He X, Liu W, Qin N, Lyu L, Dong X, Bao M. Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing. Psychophysiology 2021, 58: e13920.
pubmed: 34383329
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13920
Mangun GR. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 1995, 32: 4–18.
pubmed: 7878167
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x
Motter BC. Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4. Journal of Neuroscience 1994, 14: 2178–2189.
pubmed: 8158264
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02178.1994
Rees G, Frith CD, Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 1997, 278: 1616–1619.
pubmed: 9374459
doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1616
Vidnyánszky Z, Sohn W. Learning to suppress task-irrelevant visual stimuli with attention. Vision Res 2005, 45: 677–685.
pubmed: 15639494
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.009
Hu Q, Hu W, Liu K, Bu X, Hu L, Li L. Modulation of spike count correlations between macaque primary visual cortex neurons by difficulty of attentional task. Neurosci Bull 2022, 38: 489–504.
pubmed: 34783985
doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00790-w
Liu B, Wang X, Wang L, Qu Q, Zhang W, Wang B, et al. Attention field size alters patterns of population receptive fields in the early visual cortex. Neurosci Bull 2022, 38: 205–208.
pubmed: 34855143
doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00789-3
Song F, Lyu L, Zhao J, Bao M. The role of eye-specific attention in ocular dominance plasticity. Cereb Cortex 2023, 33: 983–996.
pubmed: 35332915
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac116
Wang M, McGraw P, Ledgeway T. Attentional eye selection modulates sensory eye dominance. Vision Res 2021, 188: 10–25.
pubmed: 34280813
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.06.006
Ooi TL, He ZJ. Sensory eye dominance: Relationship between eye and brain. Eye Brain 2020, 12: 25–31.
pubmed: 32021530
pmcid: 6980844
doi: 10.2147/EB.S176931
Said CP, Heeger DJ. A model of binocular rivalry and cross-orientation suppression. PLoS Comput Biol 2013, 9: e1002991.
pubmed: 23555225
pmcid: 3610603
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002991
Katyal S, Engel SA, He B, He S. Neurons that detect interocular conflict during binocular rivalry revealed with EEG. J Vis 2016, 16: 18.
pubmed: 26891825
doi: 10.1167/16.3.18
Katyal S, Vergeer M, He S, He B, Engel SA. Conflict-sensitive neurons gate interocular suppression in human visual cortex. Sci Rep 2018, 8: 1239.
pubmed: 29352155
pmcid: 5775389
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19809-w
Whittle P. Binocular rivalry and the contrast at contours. Q J Exp Psychol 1965, 17: 217–226.
pubmed: 5825693
doi: 10.1080/17470216508416435
Hollins M. The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression. Percept Psychophys 1980, 27: 550–556.
pubmed: 7393703
doi: 10.3758/BF03198684
Bai J, Dong X, He S, Bao M. Monocular deprivation of Fourier phase information boosts the deprived eye’s dominance during interocular competition but not interocular phase combination. Neuroscience 2017, 352: 122–130.
pubmed: 28391010
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.053
Finn AE, Baldwin AS, Reynaud A, Hess RF. Visual plasticity and exercise revisited: No evidence for a “cycling lane.” J Vis 2019, 19: 21.
pubmed: 31246227
doi: 10.1167/19.6.21
Kim HW, Kim CY, Blake R. Monocular perceptual deprivation from interocular suppression temporarily imbalances ocular dominance. Curr Biol 2017, 27: 884–889.
pubmed: 28262490
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.063
Lunghi C, Burr DC, Morrone C. Brief periods of monocular deprivation disrupt ocular balance in human adult visual cortex. Curr Biol 2011, 21: R538–R539.
pubmed: 21783029
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.004
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009, 41: 1149–1160.
pubmed: 19897823
doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Brainard DH. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 1997, 10: 433–436.
pubmed: 9176952
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 1997, 10: 437–442.
pubmed: 9176953
doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
Brown RJ, Norcia AM. A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP. Vision Res 1997, 37: 2401–2408.
pubmed: 9381675
doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00045-X
Chadnova E, Reynaud A, Clavagnier S, Hess RF. Latent binocular function in amblyopia. Vision Res 2017, 140: 73–80.
pubmed: 28842260
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.07.014
Gu L, Deng S, Feng L, Yuan J, Chen Z, Yan J, et al. Effects of monocular perceptual learning on binocular visual processing in adolescent and adult amblyopia. iScience 2020, 23: 100875.
pubmed: 32062454
pmcid: 7021554
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100875
Hou C, Nicholas SC, Verghese P. Contrast normalization accounts for binocular interactions in human striate and extra-striate visual cortex. J Neurosci 2020, 40: 2753–2763.
pubmed: 32060172
pmcid: 7096139
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2043-19.2020
Hou C, Tyson TL, Uner IJ, Nicholas SC, Verghese P. Excitatory contribution to binocular interactions in human visual cortex is reduced in strabismic amblyopia. J Neurosci 2021, 41: 8632–8643.
pubmed: 34433631
pmcid: 8513700
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0268-21.2021
Lyu L, He S, Jiang Y, Engel SA, Bao M. Natural-scene-based steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal effects of short-term monocular deprivation. Neuroscience 2020, 435: 10–21.
pubmed: 32229234
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.039
Zhang P, Jamison K, Engel S, He B, He S. Binocular rivalry requires visual attention. Neuron 2011, 71: 362–369.
pubmed: 21791293
pmcid: 3175243
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.035
Zhou J, Baker DH, Simard M, Saint-Amour D, Hess RF. Short-term monocular patching boosts the patched eye’s response in visual cortex. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2015, 33: 381–387.
pubmed: 26410580
pmcid: 4923712
Bao M, Dong B, Liu L, Engel SA, Jiang Y. The best of both worlds: Adaptation during natural tasks produces long-lasting plasticity in perceptual ocular dominance. Psychol Sci 2018, 29: 14–33.
pubmed: 29160741
doi: 10.1177/0956797617728126
Suzuki S, Grabowecky M. Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing. Neuron 2007, 56: 741–753.
pubmed: 18031689
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.028
Neisser U, Becklen R. Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cogn Psychol 1975, 7: 480–494.
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90019-5
Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 2011: 156869.
pubmed: 21253357
doi: 10.1155/2011/156869
Hjorth B. An on-line transformation of EEG scalp potentials into orthogonal source derivations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975, 39: 526–530.
pubmed: 52448
doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(75)90056-5
May KA, Li Z, Hibbard PB. Perceived direction of motion determined by adaptation to static binocular images. Curr Biol 2012, 22: 28–32.
pubmed: 22177901
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.025
Poggio GF, Talbot WH. Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey. J Physiol 1981, 315: 469–492.
pubmed: 7310720
pmcid: 1249394
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013759
Cai Y, Mao Y, Ku Y, Chen J. Holistic integration in the processing of Chinese characters as revealed by electroencephalography frequency tagging. Perception 2020, 49: 658–671.
pubmed: 32552487
doi: 10.1177/0301006620929197
Govenlock S, Kliegl K, Sekuler A, Bennett P. Assessing the effect of aging on orientation selectivity of visual mechanisms with the steady state visually evoked potential. J Vis 2010, 8: 424.
doi: 10.1167/8.6.424
Mersad K, Caristan C. Blending into the crowd: Electrophysiological evidence of gestalt perception of a human dyad. Neuropsychologia 2021, 160: 107967.
pubmed: 34303717
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107967
Yan X, Chen J, Fu Y, Wu Y, Ku Y, Cao F. Orthographic deficits but typical visual perceptual processing in Chinese adults with reading disability. bioRxiv 2023, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.13.528424 .
doi: 10.1101/2023.02.13.528424
pubmed: 37577608
pmcid: 10418109
Tang Y, Norcia AM. An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. Electroencephalography And Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section 1995, 96: 268–277.
doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00309-3
Nguyen BN, Malavita M, Carter OL, McKendrick AM. Neuroplasticity in older adults revealed by temporary occlusion of one eye. Cortex 2021, 143: 1–11.
pubmed: 34365199
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.004
Ramamurthy M, Blaser E. Assessing the kaleidoscope of monocular deprivation effects. J Vis 2018, 18: 14.
pubmed: 30572342
doi: 10.1167/18.13.14
Wang M, McGraw P, Ledgeway T. Short-term monocular deprivation reduces inter-ocular suppression of the deprived eye. Vision Res 2020, 173: 29–40.
pubmed: 32460171
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.05.001
Zhou J, Clavagnier S, Hess RF. Short-term monocular deprivation strengthens the patched eye’s contribution to binocular combination. J Vis 2013, 13: 12.
pubmed: 23599416
doi: 10.1167/13.5.12
Gordon N, Hohwy J, Davidson MJ, van Boxtel JJA, Tsuchiya N. From intermodulation components to visual perception and cognition-a review. Neuroimage 2019, 199: 480–494.
pubmed: 31173903
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.008
Turrigiano G. Too many cooks? Intrinsic and synaptic homeostatic mechanisms in cortical circuit refinement. Annu Rev Neurosci 2011, 34: 89–103.
pubmed: 21438687
doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153238
Turrigiano GG. Homeostatic plasticity in neuronal networks: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Neurosci 1999, 22: 221–227.
pubmed: 10322495
doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01341-1
Dong X, Engel SA, Bao M. The time course of contrast adaptation measured with a new method: Detection of ramped contrast. Perception 2014, 43: 427–437.
pubmed: 25109009
doi: 10.1068/p7691
Bao M, Engel SA. Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109: 5898–5903.
pubmed: 22454502
pmcid: 3326457
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113503109
Greenlee MW, Georgeson MA, Magnussen S, Harris JP. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Res 1991, 31: 223–236.
pubmed: 2017883
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90113-J