Fact-finding survey on assisted reproductive technology in Japan.


Journal

The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
ISSN: 1447-0756
Titre abrégé: J Obstet Gynaecol Res
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9612761

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 31 07 2023
accepted: 15 08 2023
medline: 6 11 2023
pubmed: 28 8 2023
entrez: 28 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In anticipation of the future development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and to smoothly introduce new technology, it is necessary to understand the current staffing status of the medical system and the current state of treatment, as well as the status of in vitro fertilization add-ons, where the need for insurance coverage is currently a matter of debate. ART facilities in Japan were surveyed (437 valid responses, response rate: 71%). Current staffing status of the medical system, implementation rates of ART, add-on treatments, and medical supplies were investigated. Despite the abundance of embryologists, nurses, and obstetricians and gynecologists in facilities, the majority of facilities lacked counselors, anesthesiologists, and other essential medical professionals. Conventional ovarian stimulation was widely adopted (median 120 [interquartile range 60-300] cycles), followed by mild ovarian simulation (60 [30-200]). Additionally, freeze-thaw embryo transfer cycles (300 [120-750]) were performed more frequently than fresh embryo transfer cycles (30 [30-60]). Among the add-ons, assisted hatching (85.1%), chronic endometritis examination (77.2%) and treatment (76.9%), artificial oocyte activation (67.3%), endometrial receptivity analysis (64.2%), and endometrial microbiome analysis (58.9%) were relatively widely employed. The implementation of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, freeze-all strategies, and add-on treatments have become popular and widely accepted despite the lack of robust evidence regarding their safety and efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37635650
doi: 10.1111/jog.15780
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2593-2601

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Références

Outline of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics. Director-general for statistics, information policy and industrial relations. Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; 2021.
Imai Y, Endo M, Kuroda K, Tomooka K, Ikemoto Y, Sato S, et al. Risk factors for resignation from work after starting infertility treatment among Japanese women: Japan-female employment and mental health in assisted reproductive technology (J-FEMA) study. Occup Environ Med. 2020;78(6):426-432.
Katagiri Y, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, Ono M, Kato K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2020 by the ethics Committee of the Japan Society of obstetrics and gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22(1):e12494.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP). Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report National ART Success Rates. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019.
Yamada M, Ishikawa T, Iwasa T, Oishi H, Osuka S, Oka K, et al. Guidelines for reproductive medicine in Japan. Reprod Med Biol. 2022;21(1):e12483.
Masuda H, Maruyama T, Hiratsu E, Yamane J, Iwanami A, Nagashima T, et al. Noninvasive and real-time assessment of reconstructed functional human endometrium in NOD/SCID/gamma c(null) immunodeficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(6):1925-1930.
Pilot national fertility patient survey. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2018.
Lensen S, Hammarberg K, Polyakov A, Wilkinson J, Whyte S, Peate M, et al. How common is add-on use and how do patients decide whether to use them? A national survey of IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(7):1854-1861.
Boivin J, Appleton TC, Baetens P, Baron J, Bitzer J, Corrigan E, et al. Guidelines for counselling in infertility: outline version. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1301-1304.
Domar A, Vassena R, Dixon M, Costa M, Vegni E, Collura B, et al. Barriers and factors associated with significant delays to initial consultation and treatment for infertile patients and partners of infertile patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(6):1126-1136.
Ombelet W, van Eekelen R, McNally A, Ledger W, Doody K, Farquhar C. Should couples with unexplained infertility have three to six cycles of intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation or in vitro fertilization as first-line treatment? Fertil Steril. 2020;114(6):1141-1148.
Scotti M. Paying to treat infertility: coverage varies widely across Canada. 2016.
Jain T, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(9):661-666.
Exploring and Unlocking Real Key Asian insights in family building dreams! 2022.
Marcus D, Marcus A, Johnson A, Marcus S. Infertility treatment: when is it time to give up? An Internet-based survey. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011;14(1):29-34.
FY2020 Research Project for the Promotion of Support for Children and Child-rearing. Survey research on the reality of infertility treatment, Final Report. Tokyo: Nomura Research Institute, Ltd; 2021.
Is In Vitro Fertilization Expensive? ReproductiveFacts.org 2020. American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Research report on financial support for infertility treatment in foreign countrie. Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Boulet SL, Crawford S, Zhang Y, Sunderam S, Cohen B, Bernson D, et al. Embryo transfer practices and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):403-9.e1.
Macklon NS, Ahuja KK, Fauser B. Building an evidence base for IVF ‘add-ons’. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(6):853-856.
Medical Service Fertility Treatment. Korea Health Industry Developmental Institute.
Specific Treatment Support Project for Those Suffering from Infertility. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
National Patient Survey report. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority 2022.

Auteurs

Sayaka Harada (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Mitsutoshi Yamada (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Hiromitsu Shirasawa (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.

Seung Chik Jwa (SC)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Keiji Kuroda (K)

Center for Reproductive Medicine and Endoscopy, Sugiyama Clinic Marunouchi, Tokyo, Japan.

Miyuki Harada (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Yutaka Osuga (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH