Quantitative non-nutritive sucking measurement as a predictor of oral feeding readiness in newborns.
non nutritive sucking
nutritive sucking
oral feeding
preterm
silver nanowire-based flexible pressure sensor
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
13
01
2023
accepted:
25
07
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
entrez:
28
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the parameters of a silver nanowire-based flexible pressure sensor developed to measure the non-nutritive sucking (NNS) performance and predict the nutritive sucking status in preterm infants. Preterm infants who were referred for feeding difficulty during the transition period from tubal feeding to oral feeding were enrolled in our study. A flexible pressure sensor was used to measure the non-nutritive sucking parameters of neonates. The evaluator stimulated the infants' lips and tongue with a pacifier integrated with a sucking pressure sensor, to check whether non-nutritive sucking had occurred. When the sucking reflex was induced, it was measured. The infants' sucking characteristics were subdivided into classifications according to the NOMAS criteria and full oral feeding (FOF) status. Quantitative NNS measurement according to the feeding state was compared between groups. When comparing the quantitative NNS measurement by feeding characteristics, the average sucking pressure was significantly higher in infants in the FOF capable group than those in the incomplete FOF group. In addition, the maximum and average sucking pressure was significantly higher in infants with a normal sucking pattern compared to those with a disorganized sucking pattern. The average NNS pressure was divided over the range of 0-3 kPa and the same weight was assigned to each item. When the optimal cut-off value for the sensitivity and specificity of the average NNS pressure to estimate the FOF was set, a pressure of 1.5 kPa yielded the highest sensitivity (84.62%) and specificity (67.65%) on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.786, and this result was statistically significant. This study presents a quantitative parameter for non-nutritive sucking in preterm infants with the use of a flexible pressure sensor. Results show possible quantitative indicators that can aid in predicting when preterm infants can transition to oral feeding and their prognosis. This will serve as a basis for future research on determining the feeding transition period of newborns with health conditions that affect oral feeding.
Sections du résumé
Background and purpose
UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the parameters of a silver nanowire-based flexible pressure sensor developed to measure the non-nutritive sucking (NNS) performance and predict the nutritive sucking status in preterm infants.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Preterm infants who were referred for feeding difficulty during the transition period from tubal feeding to oral feeding were enrolled in our study. A flexible pressure sensor was used to measure the non-nutritive sucking parameters of neonates. The evaluator stimulated the infants' lips and tongue with a pacifier integrated with a sucking pressure sensor, to check whether non-nutritive sucking had occurred. When the sucking reflex was induced, it was measured. The infants' sucking characteristics were subdivided into classifications according to the NOMAS criteria and full oral feeding (FOF) status. Quantitative NNS measurement according to the feeding state was compared between groups.
Results
UNASSIGNED
When comparing the quantitative NNS measurement by feeding characteristics, the average sucking pressure was significantly higher in infants in the FOF capable group than those in the incomplete FOF group. In addition, the maximum and average sucking pressure was significantly higher in infants with a normal sucking pattern compared to those with a disorganized sucking pattern. The average NNS pressure was divided over the range of 0-3 kPa and the same weight was assigned to each item. When the optimal cut-off value for the sensitivity and specificity of the average NNS pressure to estimate the FOF was set, a pressure of 1.5 kPa yielded the highest sensitivity (84.62%) and specificity (67.65%) on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.786, and this result was statistically significant.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
This study presents a quantitative parameter for non-nutritive sucking in preterm infants with the use of a flexible pressure sensor. Results show possible quantitative indicators that can aid in predicting when preterm infants can transition to oral feeding and their prognosis. This will serve as a basis for future research on determining the feeding transition period of newborns with health conditions that affect oral feeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37635795
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1143416
pmc: PMC10450951
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1143416Informations de copyright
© 2023 Lee, Shin, Park, Choi, de Oliveira, Hong, Kim and Yoon.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neonatal Netw. 2012 May-Jun;31(3):148-55
pubmed: 22564310
Pediatrics. 1968 Dec;42(6):943-56
pubmed: 4235770
J Hum Lact. 2002 May;18(2):166; discussion 166-7
pubmed: 12033078
J Child Neurol. 2009 Jun;24(6):743-9
pubmed: 19491116
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;(4):CD005586
pubmed: 22513933
Early Hum Dev. 2012 Jun;88(6):345-50
pubmed: 21962771
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;103(2):616S-21S
pubmed: 26791183
Early Hum Dev. 1991 Dec;27(3):163-73
pubmed: 1802669
Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Apr;16(2):143-50
pubmed: 26945280
Codas. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1):101-7
pubmed: 25885204
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235741
pubmed: 32645061
J Perinatol. 1993 Jan-Feb;13(1):28-35
pubmed: 8445444
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Feb;28(1):19-24
pubmed: 3512348
J Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Jun;18(3):169-73
pubmed: 12796858
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Apr;38(4):398-402
pubmed: 26830270
J Perinatol. 2009 Feb;29(2):124-9
pubmed: 18830247
J Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Feb 1;18(1):30-36
pubmed: 22639541
Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Apr;19(2):97-109
pubmed: 30199390
Dysphagia. 2001 Winter;16(1):58-67
pubmed: 11213247
Adv Neonatal Care. 2004 Aug;4(4):226-34
pubmed: 15368215
J Perinatol. 2006 Nov;26(11):693-9
pubmed: 16988722
J Perinatol. 2008 Aug;28(8):541-8
pubmed: 18548084
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019 Nov 04;5:18
pubmed: 31700651