Leaf-individual calibration for a double stack multileaf collimator in photon radiotherapy.
Adaptive radiotherapy
Image guided radiotherapy
MR-Linac
MR-guided radiotherapy
Multileaf collimator
Photon radiotherapy
Quality assurance
Quality control
Small field dosimetry
Journal
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2405-6316
Titre abrégé: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101704276
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
08
01
2023
revised:
20
07
2023
accepted:
22
07
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
entrez:
28
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments, linear accelerator delivery accuracy is essential. Recently introduced double stack multileaf collimators (MLCs) have new facets in their calibration. We established a radiation-based leaf-individual calibration (LIMCA) method for double stack MLCs. MLC leaf positions were evaluated from four cardinal angles with test patterns at measurement positions throughout the radiation field on EBT3 radiochromic film for each single stack. The accuracy of the method and repeatability of the results were assessed. The effect of MLC positioning errors was characterized for a measured output factor curve and a clinical patient plan. All positions in the motor step - position calibration file were optimized in the established LIMCA method. The resulting double stack mean accuracy for all angles was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm for X1 (left bank) and 0.2 ± 0.2 mm for X2 (right bank). The accuracy of the leaf position evaluation was 0.2 mm (95% confidence level). The MLC calibration remained stable over four months. Small MLC leaf position errors (e.g. 1.2 mm field size reduction) resulted in important dose errors (-5.8 %) for small quadratic fields of 0.83 × 0.83 cm LIMCA is a new double stack MLC calibration method that increases treatment accuracy from four angles and for all moving leaves.
Sections du résumé
Background and Purpose
UNASSIGNED
In online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments, linear accelerator delivery accuracy is essential. Recently introduced double stack multileaf collimators (MLCs) have new facets in their calibration. We established a radiation-based leaf-individual calibration (LIMCA) method for double stack MLCs.
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
MLC leaf positions were evaluated from four cardinal angles with test patterns at measurement positions throughout the radiation field on EBT3 radiochromic film for each single stack. The accuracy of the method and repeatability of the results were assessed. The effect of MLC positioning errors was characterized for a measured output factor curve and a clinical patient plan.
Results
UNASSIGNED
All positions in the motor step - position calibration file were optimized in the established LIMCA method. The resulting double stack mean accuracy for all angles was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm for X1 (left bank) and 0.2 ± 0.2 mm for X2 (right bank). The accuracy of the leaf position evaluation was 0.2 mm (95% confidence level). The MLC calibration remained stable over four months. Small MLC leaf position errors (e.g. 1.2 mm field size reduction) resulted in important dose errors (-5.8 %) for small quadratic fields of 0.83 × 0.83 cm
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
LIMCA is a new double stack MLC calibration method that increases treatment accuracy from four angles and for all moving leaves.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37635846
doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100477
pii: S2405-6316(23)00068-4
pmc: PMC10457557
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100477Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors declare the following financial interests / personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests: JD received grants from CRI – The Clinical Research Institute GmbH, ViewRay Inc., Accuray International, Accuray Incorporated, RaySearch Laboratories AB, Vision RT limited, Astellas Pharma GmbH, Merck Serono GmbH, Astra Zeneca GmbH, Solution Akademie GmbH, Ergomed PLC Surrey Research Park, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Quintiles GmbH, Pharmaceutical Research Associates GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH Co, PTW-Freiburg Dr. Pychlau GmbH, Nanobiotix A.A. as well as IntraOP Medical, all outside the submitted work. MA receives royalties from Elekta AB and is owner of Scientific RT GmbH, all outside the submitted work. SK has received speaker fees and travel reimbursement from ViewRay Inc. outside the submitted work.
Références
Med Phys. 2006 Nov;33(11):4314-9
pubmed: 17153410
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 27;17(1):59
pubmed: 35346270
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 08;17(5):348-365
pubmed: 27685132
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):301-10
pubmed: 17448883
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Mar;23(3):e13523
pubmed: 35019212
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Nov 14;16(1):217
pubmed: 34775998
Z Med Phys. 2018 Aug;28(3):211-223
pubmed: 29550014
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Nov 7;61(21):7704-7724
pubmed: 27740945
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul;24(3):196-9
pubmed: 24931092
Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4197-212
pubmed: 19810494
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Apr 08;18:98-101
pubmed: 31341983
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Mar;168:106-112
pubmed: 35121031
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jun 21;49(12):2631-43
pubmed: 15272678
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Apr 15;17(1):75
pubmed: 35428327
Med Phys. 2020 Feb;47(2):317-330
pubmed: 31682018
Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4495-503
pubmed: 19928080
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jun 21;19:6-12
pubmed: 34307914
Med Phys. 2003 May;30(5):743-50
pubmed: 12772980
Med Phys. 2001 Nov;28(11):2227-33
pubmed: 11764026
Cureus. 2017 Aug 27;9(8):e1618
pubmed: 29104835
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan 22;17:53-57
pubmed: 33898779
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Apr;20(4):106-114
pubmed: 30889312
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Jun;22(6):268-273
pubmed: 34056837
Radiat Oncol. 2022 May 25;17(1):102
pubmed: 35614486
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):219-227
pubmed: 31027639
Med Phys. 2017 Dec;44(12):6504-6514
pubmed: 28887825