Improved early and late continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with concurrent bladder neck fascial sling (RoboSling).
incontinence
intraoperative sling
prostate cancer
prostatectomy
robotic surgery
Journal
BJUI compass
ISSN: 2688-4526
Titre abrégé: BJUI Compass
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
09
10
2022
revised:
12
01
2023
accepted:
16
01
2023
medline:
28
8
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
entrez:
28
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To describe a novel RoboSling technique performed at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and its utility for enhancing urinary function recovery postoperatively. The surgical technique involves harvesting a vascularised, fascial flap from the peritoneum on the posterior aspect of the bladder. Following completion of prostatectomy, the autologous flap is tunnelled underneath the bladder and incorporated into the rectourethralis and vertical longitudinal detrusor fibres at the posterior bladder neck with a modified Rocco suture. After urethra-vesical anastomosis is completed, the corners of the flap are hitched up to Cooper's ligament bilaterally with V-Loc sutures, tensioned and secured creating a bladder neck sling. A prospective, longitudinal cohort study was performed of 193 consecutive patients undergoing RARP between December 2016 and September 2019. The first 163 patients underwent standard RARP, and the last 30 patients had the RoboSling technique performed concurrently. Continence outcomes were the primary outcomes assessed using pad number and Expanded Prostate Cancer Composite (EPIC)-urinary domain questionnaire. Operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), complications and oncological outcomes were secondary outcomes. The two groups were comparable for demographics and clinicopathological variables. At 3 months, zero pad usage ( The RoboSling procedure at the time of RARP was associated with earlier return to continence without negatively impacting other postoperative outcomes. This improvement in continence outcomes was maintained long term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37636210
doi: 10.1002/bco2.225
pii: BCO2225
pmc: PMC10447214
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
597-604Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None of the authors or institutions have any disclosures to declare in relation to this study.
Références
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63
pubmed: 19185977
J Urol. 1997 Mar;157(3):926-8
pubmed: 9072601
BJU Int. 2006 Aug;98(2):308-13
pubmed: 16879670
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):83-94
pubmed: 16194712
J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):179-84
pubmed: 26784645
Int Neurourol J. 2017 Dec;21(4):302-308
pubmed: 29298473
J Robot Surg. 2014 Jun;8(2):99-104
pubmed: 27637518
Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6):1163-7
pubmed: 15922423
Urol Int. 2009;83(1):19-21
pubmed: 19641353
BJUI Compass. 2021 Jan 17;2(4):226-237
pubmed: 35475296
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1464-8
pubmed: 20171689
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:9-17
pubmed: 28336286
Urology. 2014 Mar;83(3):632-9
pubmed: 24387929
J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):369-375
pubmed: 27693447
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
pubmed: 11113727
JAMA. 2000 Jan 19;283(3):354-60
pubmed: 10647798
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17
pubmed: 22749852
Prog Urol. 2008 May;18(5):304-10
pubmed: 18538276
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep;18(9):71
pubmed: 28718165
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060
pubmed: 30017351
World J Urol. 2021 Jul;39(7):2475-2481
pubmed: 33112984
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):750-759
pubmed: 33573861
J Endourol. 2015 Dec;29(12):1379-85
pubmed: 26131781