Public-private partnership in the Portuguese health sector.

Health service quality Public management hospitals Public sector comparator Public-private partnerships Value-for-money

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 16 06 2022
revised: 25 07 2023
accepted: 13 08 2023
medline: 28 8 2023
pubmed: 28 8 2023
entrez: 28 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since 2001, in Portugal, constant reforms in hospital management have accompanied the transformations in the management models applied to public administration, intending to ensure a higher quality of services and, simultaneously, a more significant economic efficiency. This study aims to analyse, for the period between 2012 and 2021, the economic and financial results (value-for-money) of the PPP model, compared with the public management hospitals (PMH). It used a mixed research approach based on multiple case studies and archival research. As the main results, it was found that: i) the PPP model, applied to the health sector, appears to be advantageous, not only regarding the economic and financial results but also concerning the quality of service provision; and ii) despite the value-for-money generated by the PPP model, the lower operating costs and the superior performance in comparison with PMH, the government has permanently opted to revert from a PPP model to a PMH model. This study concluded that the hospital management model is instead seen as an instrumentalised political instrument than a management tool that could generate savings for the taxpayers. Several practical implications are presented.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37636464
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19122
pii: S2405-8440(23)06330-2
pmc: PMC10457536
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e19122

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Qual Quant. 2019;53(1):363-376
pubmed: 30930496
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):17
pubmed: 27180236
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Jan 16;2020:5834532
pubmed: 32015796
Health Policy. 2019 Apr;123(4):412-418
pubmed: 30554791
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jul;113:110-9
pubmed: 24861412
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719881507
pubmed: 31617451
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Dec;27(12):1363-1371
pubmed: 33819433
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 04;19(13):
pubmed: 35805844
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261907
pubmed: 35025902

Auteurs

Nuno José Pinho Rodrigues (NJP)

Instituto Politécnico de Gestão e Tecnologia, V. N. de Gaia, Portugal.
REMIT-Universidade Portucalense, R. António Bernardino de Almeida, 541, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.

João M S Carvalho (JMS)

REMIT-Universidade Portucalense, Porto, Portugal.
R. António Bernardino de Almeida 541, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH