Bottoms Up: A History of Rectal Nutrition From 1870 to 1920.
Austin Flint
John Murphy
nurtritive enema
proctoclysis
rectal alimentation
rectal nutrition
Journal
Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches
ISSN: 2691-3593
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101769928
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
08
12
2020
accepted:
08
01
2021
medline:
10
2
2021
pubmed:
10
2
2021
entrez:
28
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
From the 1870s through the early 20th century, physicians frequently relied upon nutritive enemata to succor patients suffering from bowel obstructions and other disorders of the gastrointestinal system. Far from extraordinary or outlandish, this therapy was used on paupers and presidents alike, including on Garfield and McKinley after their assassination attempts. The medical milieu of the late 19th century provided particularly promising circumstances for its practice, with the rise of allopathic medicine generally-and surgery especially-coinciding with flourishing research on the physiology of nutrition. Although ongoing discussions debated the merits of different methods and various ingredients, few in the United States or Europe doubted the efficacy of rectal alimentation. However, in the early 20th century, new studies utilizing biochemistry demonstrated the inability of such instillations to provide significant calories or protein, and the intervention fell from favor. Proctoclysis-or rectal hydration-remained standard of care for the next 20 years, strongly supported by John B. Murphy and other surgeons. Ultimately, intravenous hydration and, much later, total parenteral nutrition replaced the rectal route.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37638245
doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000039
pmc: PMC10455437
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e039Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
Références
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2016 Jul;71(3):247-70
pubmed: 26888942
Am J Surg. 1968 Jun;115(6):812-24
pubmed: 4870216
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1978 Apr;33(2):129-49
pubmed: 350956
Bull Hist Med. 2018;92(4):634-663
pubmed: 30613046
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e616-e624
pubmed: 34784667
Proc R Soc Med. 1911;4(Ther Pharmacol Sect):63-76
pubmed: 19975597
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2005 Dec;35(4):367-70
pubmed: 16447347
Buffalo Med J. 1901 Nov;41(4):271-293
pubmed: 36885384
Br Med J. 1882 Mar 25;1(1108):420-1
pubmed: 20750147
Br Med J. 1913 Jun 28;1(2739):1361-7
pubmed: 20766702
Clio Med. 1995;32:48-74
pubmed: 9061236
Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):542-6
pubmed: 22939975
Am J Surg. 2013 Oct;206(4):613-8
pubmed: 23827513
Cal West Med. 1930 Dec;33(6):857-60
pubmed: 18741588
Bull Hist Med. 2020;94(1):29-63
pubmed: 32362593
Chic Med J. 1859 Feb;16(2):86-88
pubmed: 37411284
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2018 Apr 1;73(2):168-187
pubmed: 29529287
Br Med J. 1903 Jul 11;2(2219):68-9
pubmed: 20761013
Trans Med Chir Soc Edinb. 1906;25:126-149
pubmed: 29583393
Ann Surg. 1924 May;79(5):643-61
pubmed: 17865024
Nutr Rev. 1977 Jun;35(6):144-5
pubmed: 327355
Ann Surg. 1908 Jun;47(6):870-2
pubmed: 17862175
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Apr;72(4):1106-13
pubmed: 22491636
J Intraven Nurs. 1996 Jan-Feb;19(1):5-14
pubmed: 8708844
J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Jun;28(3):243-51
pubmed: 20150597