Quantification of Chromosomal Aberrations in Mammalian Cells.

Cancer Chromosomal instability Congenital malignancies DNA repair DNA replication Genome integrity Mitosis

Journal

Bio-protocol
ISSN: 2331-8325
Titre abrégé: Bio Protoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635102

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 10 11 2022
revised: 19 03 2023
accepted: 10 05 2023
medline: 28 8 2023
pubmed: 28 8 2023
entrez: 28 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Maintenance of genome integrity requires efficient and faithful resolution of DNA breaks and DNA replication obstacles. Dysfunctions in any of the processes orchestrating such resolution can lead to chromosomal instability, which appears as numerical and structural chromosome aberrations. Conventional cytogenetics remains as the golden standard method to detect naturally occurring chromosomal aberrations or those resulting from the treatment with genotoxic drugs. However, the success of cytogenetic studies depends on having high-quality chromosome spreads, which has been proven to be particularly challenging. Moreover, a lack of scoring guidelines and standardized methods for treating cells with genotoxic agents contribute to significant variability amongst different studies. Here, we report a simple and effective method for obtaining well-spread chromosomes from mammalian cells for the analysis of chromosomal aberrations. In this method, cells are (1) arrested in metaphase (when chromosome morphology is clearest), (2) swollen in hypotonic solution, (3) fixed before being dropped onto microscope slides, and (4) stained with DNA dyes to visualize the chromosomes. Metaphase chromosomes are then analyzed using high-resolution microscopy. We also provide examples, representative images, and useful guidelines to facilitate the scoring of the different chromosomal aberrations. This method can be used for the diagnosis of genetic diseases, as well as for cancer studies, by identifying chromosomal defects and providing insight into the cellular processes that influence chromosome integrity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37638291
doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4739
pii: e4739
pmc: PMC10450737
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e4739

Informations de copyright

©Copyright : © 2023 The Authors; This is an open access article under the CC BY license.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Références

Cancers (Basel). 2019 Feb 15;11(2):
pubmed: 30781398
Genes Dev. 2017 Jul 15;31(14):1469-1482
pubmed: 28860160
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3287
pubmed: 31337767
Cell. 2018 Sep 6;174(6):1347-1360
pubmed: 30193109
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 8;13(1):5167
pubmed: 36075897
Nat Commun. 2014 Feb 27;5:3347
pubmed: 24572510
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;817:93-120
pubmed: 22147570
Genes Dev. 2019 Oct 1;33(19-20):1397-1415
pubmed: 31467087
Cytometry A. 2003 Jan;51(1):46-51
pubmed: 12500304

Auteurs

Inés Paniagua (I)

Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jacqueline J L Jacobs (JJL)

Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH