Impact of waste management among Industry 4.0 and sustainable development.
3Rs
Environment
Industry 4.0
Sustainable development
Waste management
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
21
03
2023
accepted:
21
07
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
entrez:
28
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study is aimed at investigating the impact of waste management in the context of Industry 4.0 and sustainable development. Data were collected from 257 production managers in the industrial sector using a survey questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS and PLS-SEM. The findings indicated that Industry 4.0 and waste management significantly contribute to achieving sustainable development. The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies and effective waste management practices can help organizations implement sustainable development goals. Practical implications include assisting organizations in implementing Industry 4.0 technologies and waste management strategies based on the 3Rs principle. This can lead to reduced environmental impacts and improved resource efficiency, contributing to sustainable development. Policymakers can also benefit from the study's insights to address waste management challenges and promote sustainable development. The study's originality lies in its incorporation of the cyber-physical system and niche theory to explore how Industry 4.0 can facilitate sustainable waste management. It highlights the transformative potential of Industry 4.0 in the industrial sector, particularly in developing countries. Overall, this research offers a unique contribution to understanding waste management within the context of Industry 4.0 and sustainable development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37639102
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28987-8
pii: 10.1007/s11356-023-28987-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100743-100752Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Abdel-Shafy HI, Mansour MS (2018) Solid waste issue: sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egypt J Pet 27(4):1275–1290
Adebayo TS, Alola AA (2023) Examining the (non) symmetric environmental quality effect of material productivity and environmental-related technologies in Iceland. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 57:103192
Adebayo TS, Kartal MT, Ağa M, Al-Faryan MAS (2023a) Role of country risks and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: evidence from MINT countries. J Environ Manag 327:116884
Adebayo TS, Ullah S, Kartal MT, Ali K, Pata UK, Ağa M (2023b) Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: the role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Sci Total Environ 859:160181
Administration, I. T. (2021). Waste Management. Retrieved from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/pakistan-waste-management Accessed 24 Apr 2023
Albus H, Ro H (2017) Corporate social responsibility: the effect of green practices in service recovery. J Hosp Tour Res 41(1):41–65
Ali QM, Nisar QA, Abidin RZU, Qammar R, Abbass K (2022) Greening the workforce in higher educational institutions: the pursuance of environmental performance. Environ Sci and Pollut Res 1–14
Alola AA, Adebayo TS (2023a) Analysing the waste management, industrial and agriculture greenhouse gas emissions of biomass, fossil fuel, and metallic ores utilization in Iceland. Sci Total Environ 887:164115
Alola AA, Adebayo TS (2023b) The potency of resource efficiency and environmental technologies in carbon neutrality target for Finland. J Clean Prod 389:136127
Barr S, Gilg AW, Ford NJ (2001) Differences between household waste reduction, reuse and recycling behavior: a study of reported behaviors, intentions, and explanatory variables. Environ Waste Manage 4(2):69–82
Beard JB, Green RL (1994) The role of turfgrasses in environmental protection and their benefits to humans. J Environ Qual 23(3):452–460
Bonilla SH, Silva HR, Terra da Silva M, Franco Gonçalves R, Sacomano JB (2018) Industry 4.0 and sustainability implications: a scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges. Sustainability 10(10):3740
Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2017) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Info Commun Eng 8(1):37–44
Carley M, Christie I (2017) Managing sustainable development. Routledge
Chaudary S, Zahid Z, Shahid S, Khan SN, Azar S (2016) Customer perception of CSR initiatives: its antecedents and consequences. Soc Responsib J 12(2):263–279
Dao V, Langella I, Carbo J (2011) From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. J Strateg Inf Syst 20(1):63–79
Frank AG, Dalenogare LS, Ayala NF (2019) Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ 210:15–26
Gericke N, Boeve-de Pauw J, Berglund T, Olsson D (2019) The sustainability consciousness questionnaire: the theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development. Sustain Dev 27(1):35–49
Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–32
Gold AH, Malhotra A, Segars AH (2001) Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):185–214
Hair JF, Celsi M, Ortinau DJ, Bush RP (2010) Essentials of marketing research (Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY
Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135
Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: a global review of solid waste management.
Hopwood B, Mellor M, O'Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13(1):38–52
Huang B, Wang X, Kua H, Geng Y, Bleischwitz R, Ren J (2018) Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:36–44
Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95(882):137–145
Industry, B. s. N. C. o. (2016). Challenges for industry 4.0 in Brazil / National Confederation of Industry. Retrieved from Brazil: https://www.portaldaindustria.com.br/publicacoes/2016/8/challenges-industry-40-brazil/ Accessed 24 Apr 2023
Irfan M, Ullah S, Razzaq A, Cai J, Adebayo TS (2023) Unleashing the dynamic impact of tourism industry on energy consumption, economic output, and environmental quality in China: a way forward towards environmental sustainability. J Clean Prod 387:135778
Islam MS, Tanaka M (2004) Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis. Mar Pollut Bull 48(7-8):624–649
Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group: Forschungsunion.
Keeble BR (1988) The Brundtland report:‘Our common future’. Med War 4(1):17–25
Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007) Transition management is a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14(1):78–91
Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications
Li M, Qammar R, Qadri SU, Khan MK, Ma Z, Qadri S, Ahmed H, Mahmood S (2023) Pro-environmental behavior, green HRM practices, and green psychological climate: examining the underlying mechanism in Pakistan. Front Environ Sci
Lee, E. A. (2008). Cyber-physical systems: Design challenges. Paper presented at the 2008 11th IEEE international symposium on an object and component-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC).
McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision-making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 25(3):193–204
Mohr LA, Webb DJ, Harris KE (2001) Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. J Consum Aff 35(1):45–72
Naz S, Jamshed S, Nisar QA, Nasir N (2021) Green HRM, psychological green climate and pro-environmental behaviors: an efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China. Curr Psychol:1–16
Ohno T, Bodek N (2019) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity press
Oztemel E, Gursev S (2020) Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J Intell Manuf 31(1):127–182
Park, K.-J., Zheng, R., & Liu, X. (2012). Cyber-physical systems: milestones and research challenges.
Qamar R, Abidin ZU, Fayyaz S, Ahmad H (2022) The influence of green human resource management practices on employee’s green creativity: the roles of green self-identity & green shared vision. Environ Sol Pollut Res
Rasoolimanesh SM, Ali F, Jaafar M (2018) Modeling residents’ perceptions of tourism development: linear versus non-linear models. J Destin Mark Manag 10:1–9
Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) Smart pls 2.0 m3, vol 2. University of Hamburg): Book Smart Pls, p M3
Rüßmann, M., Lorenz, M., Gerbert, P., Waldner, M., Justus, J., Engel, P., & Harnisch, M. (2015). Industry 4.0: the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consulting Group, 9(1), 54-89.
Seddon N, Mace GM, Naeem S, Tobias JA, Pigot AL, Cavanagh R et al (2016) Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283(1844):20162094
Shariatzadeh N, Lundholm T, Lindberg L, Sivard G (2016) Integration of digital factory with smart factory based on Internet of Things. Procedia CIRP 50:512–517
Shpak N, Odrekhivskyi M, Doroshkevych K, Sroka W (2019a) Simulation of innovative systems under Industry 4.0 conditions. Soc Sci 8(7):202
Shpak N, Podolchak N, Karkovska V, Sroka W (2019b) The influence of age factors on the reform of the public service of Ukraine. Cent Eur J Public Policy 13(2):40–52
Smith JA (2011) Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria. Health Psychol Rev 5(1):55–61
Szeremlei AK, Magda R (2015) Sustainable production and consumption. Visegr J Bioecon Sustain Dev 4(2):57–61
Tchobanoglous G, Kreith F (2002) Handbook of solid waste management. McGraw-Hill Education
Terlau W, Hirsch D (2015) Sustainable consumption and the attitude-behavior-gap phenomenon-causes and measurements towards sustainable development. Int J Food Syst Dyn 6(3):159–174
van Straten B, Dankelman J, van der Eijk A, Horeman T (2021) A circular healthcare economy; a feasibility study to reduce surgical stainless-steel waste. Sustain Prod Consum 27:169–175
Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2941–2962
Yang F, Gu S (2021) Industry 4.0 is a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex Intell Syst 7(3):1311–1325
Zang X, Adebayo TS, Oladipupo SD, Kirikkaleli D (2023) Asymmetric impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on environmental degradation: designing an SDG framework for developed economy. Environ Technol 44(6):774–791
Zéman Z (2019) New dimensions of internal controls in banking after the GFC. Econ Ann-XXI 176:38–48
Zhang X, Jeong E, Olson ED, Evans G (2020) Investigating the effect of message framing on event attendees’ engagement with an advertisement promoting food waste reduction practices. Int J Hosp Manag 89:102589
Zhu D, Zhang S, Sutton DB (2015) Linking Daly’s Proposition to policymaking for sustainable development: indicators and pathways. J Clean Prod 102:333–341