Pattern visual evoked potential and foveal sensitivity in amblyopia.
Anisometropic amblyopia
Foveal sensitivity
Pattern VEP
Strabismic amblyopia
Visual evoked potential
Journal
Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2622
Titre abrégé: Doc Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370667
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
08
03
2023
accepted:
07
08
2023
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
28
8
2023
entrez:
28
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Amblyopic eyes show impaired visual functions such as poor visual acuity and reduced foveal sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between foveal threshold and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Forty-five subjects (age range: 7-28 years, 43.3% female) including 15 strabismic and 15 anisometropic amblyopes, and 15 age-similar control subjects participated in this study. Each subject had pattern visual evoked potentials and foveal threshold recorded in each eye using RetiScan (Roland Consult, Germany) and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer II (HFA II; Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA), respectively. These outcomes were compared among the amblyopic eyes, their fellow eyes, and the control eyes. Compared to the amblyopic eyes (Mean ± SD: 33.4 ± 3.48 dB), the foveal threshold was higher in fellow eyes (37.0 ± 2.04 dB, p = 0.0002) and in control eyes (38.7 ± 0.96 dB, p < 0.0001). Strabismic amblyopes had a lower foveal threshold than anisometropic amblyopes (31.8 ± 3.86 vs. 35.0 ± 2.17 dB, p = 0.005). Relative to the P100 peak time in fellow eyes (1° checks:116.1 ± 9.00 ms; 0.25° checks:118.8 ± 5.67 ms), amblyopic eyes had delayed P100 peak times for both 1° (122.7 ± 11.4 ms, p < 0.0001) and 0.25° (130.4 ± 11.2 ms, p < 0.0001) check sizes. There were also significant differences in P100 peak time between amblyopic and control eyes (1°:122.7 ± 11.4 vs.112.4 ± 5.01 ms, p = 0.15; 0.25°:130.4 ± 11.2 vs.113.9 ± 5.71 ms, p < 0.0001) and between fellow and control eyes (0.25°:118.8 ± 5.67 vs.113.9 ± 5.71 ms, p = 0.009). Amblyopic eyes exhibited lower N75-P100 amplitudes than fellow eyes (1°:12.6 ± 7.96 vs.15.9 ± 8.82 µV, p = 0.01; 0.25°:10.6 ± 6.11 vs. 15.8 ± 10.6 µV, p = 0.001) and control eyes (0.25°: p = 0.0008). Foveal threshold correlated negatively with P100 peak time (1°: r = -0.45, p = 0.002 and 0.25°: r = -0.58, p < 0.0001) and positively with N75-P100 amplitude responses (1°: r = 0.42, p = 0.004 and 0.25°: r = 0.52, p = 0.002). Amblyopic eyes showed reduced pattern VEP amplitudes and delayed peak times with significant associations with the foveal sensitivity. However, the VEP measures overlapped extensively between amblyopic and control eyes with no apparent criterion value for optimal discrimination, suggesting that foveal sensitivity might be a better discriminator of amblyopia than pattern VEP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37639170
doi: 10.1007/s10633-023-09948-5
pii: 10.1007/s10633-023-09948-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109-119Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Fu Z, Hong H, Su Z, Lou B, Pan CW (2020) Global prevalence of amblyopia and disease burden projections through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 104(8):1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314759
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314759
pubmed: 31704700
Huang J, Zhou Y, Liu C, Liu Z, Luan C, Tzvetanov T (2017) The neural basis of spatial vision losses in the dysfunctional visual system. Sci Rep 7(1):11376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11364-0
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11364-0
pubmed: 28900225
pmcid: 5595843
Andrade EP, Berezovsky A, Sacai PY, Pereira JM, Rocha DM, Salomao SR (2016) Dysfunction in the fellow eyes of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopic children assessed by visually evoked potentials. Arq Bras Oftalmol 79(5):294–298. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20160085
doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20160085
pubmed: 27982206
Asper L, Crewther D, Crewther SG (2000) Strabismic amblyopia. Part 2. Neural processing. Clin Exp Optometry 83(4):200–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2000.tb05003.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2000.tb05003.x
McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA (2003) The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis 3(5):380–405. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.5.5
doi: 10.1167/3.5.5
pubmed: 12875634
Maheshwari R, Sukul RR, Gupta Y, Gupta M, Phougat A, Dey M et al (2011) Accommodation: its relation to refractive errors, amblyopia and biometric parameters. Nepalese J Ophthalmol Biannu Peer Rev Acad J Nepal Ophthalmic Soc NEPJOPH 3(2):146–150. https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v3i2.5267
doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v3i2.5267
Wang J, Chen BH, Tan YL (1988) Application of visual evoked potential in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal lesions. Chin Med J 101(4):257–262
pubmed: 3138084
Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Mizota A et al (2016) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update). Doc Ophthalm Adv Ophthalmol 133(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9553-y
doi: 10.1007/s10633-016-9553-y
Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Spitoni G, Aprile T, Patria F, Spinelli D et al (2005) Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. Neuroimage 24(3):874–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.029
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.029
pubmed: 15652322
Heravian J, Daneshvar R, Dashti F, Azimi A, Ostadi Moghaddam H, Yekta AA et al (2011) Simultaneous pattern visual evoked potential and pattern electroretinogram in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Iran Red Crescent Med J 13(1):21–26
pubmed: 22946015
pmcid: 3407582
Hou C, Pettet MW, Norcia AM (2008) Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: visual-evoked potential measurements. J Vis 8(4):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.4.2
doi: 10.1167/8.4.2
Zagui RM. Amblyopia (2018) Types, diagnosis, treatment, and new perspectives. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 102:1492–496
Korah S, Philip S, Jasper S, Antonio-Santos A, Braganza A (2014) Strabismus surgery before versus after completion of amblyopia therapy in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(10):CD009272. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009272.pub2
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009272.pub2
pubmed: 25315969
Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Keech RV (1991) Anisometropic amblyopia. Ophthalmology 98(2):258–263
Creel DJ. Visually evoked potentials by Donnell J. Creel (2016) Webvision: the organization of the retina and visual system [Internet]. 2016:1–21
Sireteanu R, Fronius M (1990) Human amblyopia: structure of the visual field. Exp Brain Res 79(3):603–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229328
doi: 10.1007/BF00229328
pubmed: 2340877
Donahue SP, Wall M, Kutzko KE, Kardon RH (1999) Automated perimetry in amblyopia: a generalized depression. Am J Ophthalmol 127(3):312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(98)90327-0
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)90327-0
pubmed: 10088742
Philipp W, Mayer W (1989) Investigation of visual field defects in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes with the octopus program G1. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227(5):448–454
doi: 10.1007/BF02172897
Sokol S (1983) Abnormal evoked potential latencies in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 67(5):310–314. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.67.5.310
doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.5.310
pubmed: 6838802
pmcid: 1040049
Hosseinmenni S, Talebnejad MR, Jafarzadehpur E, Mirzajani A, Osroosh E (2015) P100 wave latency in anisometropic and esotropic amblyopia versus normal eyes. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 10(3):268–273. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.170359
doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.170359
pubmed: 26730312
pmcid: 4687260
Davis ET, Bass SJ, Sherman J (1995) Flash visual evoked potential (VEP) in amblyopia and optic nerve disease. Optometr Vis Sci 72(9):612–618. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199509000-00004
doi: 10.1097/00006324-199509000-00004
de Mendonca HFR, Abbruzzese S, Bagolini B, Nofroni I, Ferreira EL, Odom JV (2013) Visual evoked potential importance in the complex mechanism of amblyopia. Int Ophthalmol 33(5):515–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-013-9734-6
doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9734-6
Chung W, Hong S, Lee JB, Han SH (2008) Pattern visual evoked potential as a predictor of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Korean J Ophthal KJO 22(4):251–254. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2008.22.4.251
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2008.22.4.251
Tomoda H, Celesia GG, Brigell MG, Toleikis S (1991) The effects of age on steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol Adv Ophthalmol 77(3):201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00161368
doi: 10.1007/bf00161368
Porciatti V, Burr DC, Morrone MC, Fiorentini A (1992) The effects of aging on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vis Res 32(7):1199–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90214-4
doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90214-4
pubmed: 1455694