Sexual Structure Sparing for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.

Erectile dysfuction Magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy Penile bulb Prostate cancer Radiotherapy

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 15 06 2023
revised: 26 07 2023
accepted: 03 08 2023
medline: 29 8 2023
pubmed: 29 8 2023
entrez: 28 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Erectile dysfunction represents a major side effect of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, negatively impacting men's quality of life. While radiation therapy (RT) advances have enabled the mitigation of both genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities, no significant improvement has been showed in sexual quality of life over time. The primary aim of this review was to assess sexual structures' dose-volume parameters associated with the onset of erectile dysfunction. We searched the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov until January 4, 2023. Studies reporting the impact of the dose delivered to sexual structures on sexual function or the feasibility of innovative sexual structure-sparing approaches were deemed eligible. Sexual-sparing strategies have involved four sexual organs. The mean penile bulb doses exceeding 20 Gy are predictive of erectile dysfunction in modern PCa RT trial. Maintaining a D100% of ≤36 Gy on the internal pudendal arteries showed preservation of erectile function in 88% of patients at 5 yr. Neurovascular bundle sparing appears feasible with magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, yet its clinical impact remains unanswered. Doses delivered to the testicles during PCa RT usually remain <2 Gy and generate a decrease in testosterone levels ranging from -4.6% to -17%, unlikely to have any clinical impact. Current data highlight the technical feasibility of sexual sparing for PCa RT. The proportion of erectile dysfunction attributable to the dose delivered to sexual structures is still largely unknown. While the ability to maintain sexual function over time is impacted by factors such as age or comorbidities, only selected patients are likely to benefit from sexual-sparing RT. Technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) made it possible to significantly lower the dose delivered to sexual structures. While sexual function is known to decline with age, the preservation of sexual structures for prostate cancer RT is likely to be beneficial only in selected patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37640583
pii: S2588-9311(23)00163-3
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jennifer Le Guevelou (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France. Electronic address: Jennifer.leguevelou@gmail.com.

Paul Sargos (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.

Ludovic Ferretti (L)

Department of Urology, MSP Bordeaux Bagatelle, Talence, France.

Stephane Supiot (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.

David Pasquier (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Gilles Créhange (G)

CNRS, CRIStAL UMR 9189, Université de Lille & Centrale Lille, Lille, France.

Pierre Blanchard (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, INSERM U1018 Oncostat, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Christophe Hennequin (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.

Olivier Chapet (O)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France.

Ulrike Schick (U)

Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Brest, France.

Manon Baty (M)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Ingrid Masson (I)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Guillaume Ploussard (G)

Department of Urology, Clinique La Croix-du-Sud, Quint-Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.

Renaud De Crevoisier (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Igor Latorzeff (I)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.

Classifications MeSH