Multifocal visual evoked potential for evaluation of open-angle glaucoma.
POAG
SD-OCT
best-corrected visual acuity
logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution
mfVEP
multifocal visual evoked potential
primary open-angle glaucoma
retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
static automated perimetry
visual field
Journal
Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal
ISSN: 2322-3219
Titre abrégé: Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101611331
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
08
2021
accepted:
29
09
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
pubmed:
17
11
2021
entrez:
29
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To correlate multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) findings with static automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in eyes with primary open- angle glaucoma (POAG). This cross-sectional study included a consecutive sample of 40 eyes of 40 patients with POAG. The participants underwent a complete ophthalmologic assessment, axial length (AL) measurement, and assessments with SAP, SD-OCT, and mfVEP. POAG cases were aged 49.70 (14.16) years (mean [SD]) and most were females (n = 24, 60%). For eyes of patients with POAG, the mfVEP upper-ring signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) showed a significant negative correlation with best-corrected logMAR visual acuity (r = - 0.33; mfVEP is a promising tool for objective assessment of the VF in patients with POAG, as it is positively correlated with the VF and OCT RNFL thickness. Future longitudinal studies with a larger sample size and a specific glaucoma subtype, along with multiple follow-up evaluations, are warranted to confirm our preliminary results.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
To correlate multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) findings with static automated perimetry (SAP) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in eyes with primary open- angle glaucoma (POAG).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This cross-sectional study included a consecutive sample of 40 eyes of 40 patients with POAG. The participants underwent a complete ophthalmologic assessment, axial length (AL) measurement, and assessments with SAP, SD-OCT, and mfVEP.
Results
UNASSIGNED
POAG cases were aged 49.70 (14.16) years (mean [SD]) and most were females (n = 24, 60%). For eyes of patients with POAG, the mfVEP upper-ring signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) showed a significant negative correlation with best-corrected logMAR visual acuity (r = - 0.33;
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
mfVEP is a promising tool for objective assessment of the VF in patients with POAG, as it is positively correlated with the VF and OCT RNFL thickness. Future longitudinal studies with a larger sample size and a specific glaucoma subtype, along with multiple follow-up evaluations, are warranted to confirm our preliminary results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37641709
doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1429
pmc: PMC10460219
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
114-120Informations de copyright
© Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;89(7):e550-4
pubmed: 21599873
Eye (Lond). 2011 Oct;25(10):1302-9
pubmed: 21720415
Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar-Apr;52(2):156-79
pubmed: 17355855
Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11(5):367-376
pubmed: 28603546
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;135(2):107-119
pubmed: 28702796
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003 Mar;22(2):201-51
pubmed: 12604058
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar;89(3):340-4
pubmed: 15722316
BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug 06;12:36
pubmed: 22866948
Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;130(3):197-209
pubmed: 25616700
Doc Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;128(3):179-89
pubmed: 24615593
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):29-39
pubmed: 11755837
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec;120(12):1672-81
pubmed: 12470141
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;96(4):554-9
pubmed: 22116959
Doc Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;132(1):27-37
pubmed: 26792427
Pituitary. 2015 Oct;18(5):598-603
pubmed: 25349031
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;23(6):497-505
pubmed: 23047167
BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug 02;12:34
pubmed: 22856337
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;45(1):24-32
pubmed: 27083150
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):939-49
pubmed: 26891880
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;48(8):3662-8
pubmed: 17652736
Doc Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;125(1):1-9
pubmed: 22476612