Radiographic evaluation before surgical extraction of impacted third molar to reduce the maxillary sinus related complication.
Cone-beam computed tomography
Maxilla
Maxillary sinus
Panoramic radiography
Third molar
Journal
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
ISSN: 2234-7550
Titre abrégé: J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101580242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Aug 2023
31 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
08
01
2023
revised:
13
02
2023
accepted:
18
02
2023
medline:
29
8
2023
pubmed:
29
8
2023
entrez:
29
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical extraction of maxillary third molars is routine in departments devoted to oral and maxillofacial surgery. Because maxillary third molars are anatomically adjacent to the maxillary sinus, complications such as oroantral fistula and maxillary sinusitis can occur. Here we explore the factors that can cause radiographic postoperative swelling of the maxillary sinus mucosa after surgical extraction. This retrospective study reviewed the clinical records and radiographs of patients who underwent maxillary third-molar extraction. Preoperative panoramas, Waters views, and cone-beam computed tomography were performed for all patients. The patients were divided into two groups; those with and those without swelling of the sinus mucosa swelling or air-fluid level in a postoperative Waters view. We analyzed the age and sex of patients, vertical position, angulation, number of roots, and relation to the maxillary sinus between groups. Statistical analysis used logistic regression and A total of 91 patients with 153 maxillary third molars were enrolled in the study. Variables significantly related to swelling of the maxillary sinus mucosa after surgical extraction were the age and the distance between the palatal cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the maxillary sinus floor ( Maxillary third molars are anatomically adjacent to the maxillary sinus and require careful handling when the maxillary sinus is pneumatized to the CEJ of teeth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37641901
pii: jkaoms.2023.49.4.192
doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.4.192
pmc: PMC10466012
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
192-197Références
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun;40(6):650-3
pubmed: 21211942
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 May;71(5):839-45
pubmed: 23598549
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jul;45(5):387-91
pubmed: 17161510
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;71(1):5-13
pubmed: 23010375
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 Oct 1;33(7):e708-e712
pubmed: 35765135
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;76(2):278-286
pubmed: 28859924
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;12(5):645-650
pubmed: 36045940
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;21(8):1050-1058
pubmed: 30074010
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1379-89
pubmed: 14663801
Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Oct;32(8):745-51
pubmed: 20490493
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;71(10):1653-7
pubmed: 23890786
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):1035-9
pubmed: 22494509
Imaging Sci Dent. 2017 Sep;47(3):149-155
pubmed: 28989897
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Sep;102(3):375-81
pubmed: 16920546
Eur J Dent. 2010 Oct;4(4):462-7
pubmed: 20922167