Contemporary European practice in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the 2022 European TAVI Pathway Registry.

Background

A steep rise in the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the management of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis occurred. Minimalist TAVI procedures and streamlined patient pathways within experienced Heart Valve Centres are designed to overcome the challenges of ever-increasing procedural volume.

Aims

The 2022 European TAVI Pathway Survey aims to describe contemporary TAVI practice across Europe.

Materials and methods

Between October and December 2022, TAVI operators from 32 European countries were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their current practice.

Results

Responses were available from 147 TAVI centres in 26 countries. In 2021, the participating centres performed a total number of 27,223 TAVI procedures, with a mean of 185 TAVI cases per centre (median 138; IQR 77-194). Treatment strategies are usually (87%) discussed at a dedicated Heart Team meeting. Transfemoral TAVI is performed with local anaesthesia only (33%), with associated conscious sedation (60%), or under general anaesthesia (7%). Primary vascular access is percutaneous transfemoral (99%) with secondary radial access (52%). After uncomplicated TAVI, patients are transferred to a high-, medium-, or low-care unit in 28%, 52%, and 20% of cases, respectively. Time to discharge is day 1 (12%), day 2 (31%), day 3 (29%), or day 4 or more (28%).

Conclusion

Reported adoption of minimalist TAVI techniques is common among European TAVI centres, but rates of next-day discharge remain low. This survey highlights the significant progress made in refining TAVI treatment and pathways in recent years and identifies possible areas for further improvement.

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Rosseel, Mylotte, Cosyns, Vanhaverbeke, Zweiker, Teles, Angerås, Neylon, Rudolph, Wykrzykowska, Patterson, Costa, Ojeda, Tzikas, Abras, Leroux, Van Belle, Tchétché, Bleiziffer, Swaans, Parma, Blackman, Van Mieghem, Grygier, Redwood, Prendergast, Van Camp and De Backer.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

DM: consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Microport. TR: proctor and advisor for JenaValve, speaker’s honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and JenaValve. JW: institutional grant from Medtronic and speaker’s honoraria (also to the institution) from Boston Scientific and Sinomed. SO: consulting fees from Medtronic and Edwards, speaker’s honoraria from Philips and World Medical, and research grant (PI21/00949) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Instituto de Salud Carlos III). LL: proctoring and consulting honoraria for Abbott, Edwards, and Medtronic. DB: proctoring and consulting honoraria for Abbott, Edwards, and Medtronic. NM: institutional research grant support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, and PulseCath BV; and consultancy fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Medtronic, Daiichi Sankyo, Abiomed, Amgen, JenaValve, Anteris, and PulseCath BV. MG: Boston Scientific—research and travel grants, speaker’s honoraria, proctor, and advisory board member; Medtronic—research and travel grants, speaker’s honoraria, proctor, advisory board member; Abbott—speaker’s honoraria and travel grants; and Edwards Lifesciences—speakers honoraria and travel grants. BP: speaker’s fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Medtronic and consulting fees from Anteris and Microport. ODB: institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer JS declared a past co-authorship with the author ODB to the handling editor.